Abstract
Net aerial primary production (NAPP) of marsh macrophytes is usually estimated either by destructive sampling techniques or by phenometric techniques. Destructive methods, however, are thought to be inaccurate while phenometric techniques are very labour intensive. In this study a new method is presented which allows an accurate and more efficient estimation of NAPP. The method combines destructive sampling to determine end-of-season biomass and phenometric techniques to estimate the mortality of biomass before the end of the season. NAPP is derived through summation of these two estimates. Techniques needed to calculate the precision of the NAPP estimate are provided. The so called hybrid technique was used to estimate NAPP ofScirpus maritimus L. in a brackish marsh along the Westerschelde estuary, the Netherlands. Estimated NAPP was 1372 g m-2. End-of-season biomass accounted for 1106 g m-2, while mortality contributed 266 g m-2. Precision of the end-of-season biomass and the mortality estimates, expressed as coefficient of variation, was 18.2 and 26.0% respectively. The precision of the resultant, NAPP, was higher: 17.2%. These results indicate that NAPP could be estimated with a higher precision than end-of-season biomass. This contradicts the view that the accuracy of NAPP estimates can only be improved at the expense of its precision.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baskerville, G. L. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. For. Res. 2: 49–53.
Dale, J. E. 1982. The growth of leaves. Studies in Biology no. 137. E. Arnold, London, UK. 60 p.
De, Leeuw, J. & Buth, G. J. 1991. Spatial and temporal variation in peak standing crop of European tidal marshes. In: Elliot, M. & Ducrotoy, J. P. (eds) Estuaries and Coasts: Spatial and Temporal Intercomparisons. Proceedings of the ECSA 19 symposium, Caen 1989. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.
De, Leeuw, J., Olff, H. & Bakker, J. 1990. Year-to-year variation in peak aboveground biomass of six salt marsh angiosperm communities as related to rainfall deficit and inundation frequency. Aquat. Bot. 36: 139–151.
Dickerman, J. A., Stewart, A. J. & Wetzel, R. G. 1986. Estimates of net aboverground production: sensitivity to sampling frequency. Ecology 67: 650–659.
Groenendijk, A. M. 1984. Primary production of four salt-marsh angiosperms in the SW Netherlands. Vegetatio 57: 143–152.
Gross, M. F., Hardisky, M. A. & Klemas, V. 1990. Inter-annual spatial variability in the response ofSpartina alterniflora biomass to amount of precipitation. J. Coastal Res. 6: 949–960.
Hatcher, B. G. & Mann, K. H. 1975. Above-ground production of marsh cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) near the northern end of its range. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 32: 83–87.
Hopkinson, C. S., Gosselink, J. G. & Parrondo, R. T. 1978. Aboveground production of seven marsh plant species in coastal Louisiana. Ecology 59: 760–769.
Hopkinson, C. S., Gosselink, J. G. & Parrondo, R. T. 1980. Production of coastal Louisiana marsh plants calculated from phenometric techniques. Ecology 61: 1091–1098.
Karagatzides, J. D. & Hutchinson, I. 1991. Intraspecific comparisons of biomass dynamics inScirpus americanus andScirpus maritimus on the Fraser River delta. J. Ecol. 79: 459–476.
Kaswadjii, R. F., Gosselink, J. G. & Turner, R. E. 1990. Estimation of primary production using five different methods in aSpartina alterniflora salt marsh. Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 1: 57–64.
Krisch, H. 1985. Biomasseproduktion und edaphische Verhältnisse vonBolboschoenus maritimus Beständen des Greifswalder Boddens. Limnologica (Berlin) 16: 277–295.
Lieffers, V. J. 1983. Growth ofTypha latifolia in boreal forest habitats, as measured by double sampling. Aquat. Bot. 15: 335–348.
Linthurst, R. A. & Reimold, R. J. 1978. An evaluation of methods for estimating the net aerial primary productivity of estuarine angiosperms. J. Appl. Ecol. 15: 919–931.
Lomnicki, A., Bandola, E. & Jankowaska, K. 1968. Modification of the Wiegert-Evans method for estimation of net primary production. Ecology 49: 147–149.
Looijen, R. C. & Bakker, J. P. 1987. Utilization of different saltmarsh plant communities by cattle and geese. In: Huiskes, A.H.L., Blom, C.W.P.M. & Rozema, J. (eds) Vegetation between Land and Sea. Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Morris, J. T. & Haskin, B. 1990. A 5-yr record of aerial primary production and stand characteristics ofSpartina alterniflora. Ecology 71: 2209–2217.
Shew, D. M., Linthurst, R. A. & Seneca, E. D. 1981. Comparison of production computation methods in a southeastern North CarolinaSpartina alterniflora salt marsh. Estuaries 4: 97–109.
Smalley, A. E. 1959. The role of two invertebrate populations,Littorina irrorata andOrchelium fidicinium, in the energy flow of a salt marsh ecosystem. Ph. D. Dissertation, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Teal, J. M. 1962. Energy flow in the salt marsh ecosystem of Georgia. Ecology 43: 614–624.
Turner, R. E. 1976. Geographic variation in salt marsh macrophytic production: a review. Contrib. Marine Sci. 20: 47–68.
Wiegert, R. G. 1962. The selection of an optimum quadrat size for sampling the standing crop of grasses and forbs. Ecology 43: 125–129.
Wiegert, R. G. & Evans, F. C. 1964. Primary production and the disappearance of dead vegetation in an old field in Southwestern Michigan. Ecology 45: 49–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Leeuw, J., Wielemaker, A., de Munck, W. et al. Net aerial primary production (NAPP) of the marsh macrophyteScirpus maritimus estimated by a combination of destructive and non-destructive sampling methods. Vegetatio 123, 101–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044892
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044892