Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro expression of partial resistance toPhytophthora palmivora by shoot cultures of papaya

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shoot apices ofCarica papaya were multiplied in vitro on solidified nutrient media supplemented with α-naphthyl-acetic acid and 6-benzylaminopurine. The micropropagated shoots were inoculated in vitro, through a stem wound, with a sporangial suspension (1.2×104 sporangia ml-1) ofPhytophthora palmivora. The symptoms exhibited by the shoots in vitro were similar to those described previously for infection of the whole plant in the field. The time taken for the host tissue to become brown and to wilt and the time to sporulation of the pathogen were all recorded for each shoot of four varieties of papaya challenged with each of ten isolates ofP. palmivora. Significant differences were observed between host-pathogen combinations for these variables and host-specificity was detected amongst the isolates ofP. palmivora. The time taken for the shoot to wilt was positively correlated with the time to sporulation of the isolated but both these variables were negatively correlated with the time to browning of the shoot. In vitro selection for disease resistance will be useful during breeding programmes involving papaya genotypes which are maintained through clonal propagation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daub, ME (1986) Tissue culture and the selection of resistance to pathogens. Ann Rev Phytopathol 24: 159–186

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scowcroft, WR, Larkin, PJ, Brettell, RIS (1983) Genetic variation from tissue culture. In: Helgeson, JP, Deverall, BJ (Eds) Use of Tissue Culture and Protoplasts in Plant Pathology, pp 139–162. Academic Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  3. Diner, AM, Mott, RL (1985) In vitro inoculation of western white pine tissue culture propagules with vegetative hyphae ofCronartium ribicola. Phytopathology 75: 1130–1131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gray, DJ, Amerson, HV (1985) In vitro colonisation and resistance of loblolly pine embryos infected with the fusiform rust fungus. In: Henke, RR, Hughes, KW, Constantin, MJ, Hollaender, A (Eds) Tissue Culture in Agriculture and Forestry, pp 257–270. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ingram, DS, MacDonald, MV (1986) In vitro selection of mutants. In: Nuclear Techniques and In vitro Culture for Plant Improvement, pp 241–258. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ribeiro, OK (1978) A Source Book of the GenusPhytophthora. AR Gantner Verlag K-G, Vaduz

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gregory, PH (1983) Some major epidemics caused byPhytophthora. In: Erwin, DC, Bartnicki-Garcia, S, Tsao, PH (Eds)Phytophthora: Its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology and Pathology, pp 271–278. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarez, AM, Nelson, MG (1982) Control ofPhytophthora palmivora in papaya orchards with weekly sprays of chlorothalonil. Plant Disease 66: 37–39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Murashige, T, Skoog, F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anon (1977) GENSTAT, A General Statistical Program. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station

  11. Litz, RE, Conover, RA (1978) In vitro propagation of papaya. HortScience 13: 241–242

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parris, GK (1942)Phytophthora parasitica on papaya (Carica papaya) in Hawaii. Phytopathology 32: 314–320

    Google Scholar 

  13. Keen, NT, Wang, MC, Bartnicki-Garcia, S, Zentmeyer, GA (1975) Phytotoxicity of mycolaminarans-β-1,3-glucans fromPhytophthora spp Physiol Plant Pathol 7: 91–97

    Google Scholar 

  14. Person, C (1966) Genetic polymorphism in parasitic systems. Nature 212: 266–267

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ko, WH (1971) Biological control of seedling root rot of papaya caused byPhytophthora palmivora. Phytopathology 61: 780–782

    Google Scholar 

  16. Helgeson, JP (1983) Studies of host-pathogen interactions in vitro. In: Helgeson, JP, Deverall, BJ (Eds) Use of Tissue Culture and Protoplasts in Plant Pathology, pp 9–38. Academic Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  17. Litz, RE (1986) Papaya (Carica papaya L.) In: Bajaj, YPS (Ed) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Vol 1, Trees, pp 220–232. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weste, G (1983) Population dynamics and survival ofPhytophthora. In: Erwin, DC, Bartnicki-Garcia, S, Tsao, PH (Eds)Phytophthora: Its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology and Pathology, pp 237–251. American Phytopathological Society, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  19. Utkhede, RS (1986) In vitro screening of the world apple germplasm collection for resistance toPhytophthora cactorum crown rot. Scientia Hortic 29: 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samson, JA (1980) Tropical Fruits. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharma, N.K., Skidmore, D.I. In vitro expression of partial resistance toPhytophthora palmivora by shoot cultures of papaya. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 14, 187–196 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043409

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043409

Key words

Navigation