Skip to main content
Log in

Chalcone synthase cosuppression phenotypes in petunia flowers: comparison of sense vs. antisense constructs and single-copy vs. complex T-DNA sequences

  • Mini-review
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flower pigmentation patterns were scored in 185 senseChalcone synthase (Chs) transgenotes and 85 antisenseChs transgenotes; upon first flowering, 139 (75%) of sense transgenotes were found to be phenotypically altered, as were 70 (82%) of the antisense transgenotes. The observed patterns document the range of phenotypic variations that occur, as well as confirm and extend the finding that senseChs constructs produce several types of morphologybased based flower pigmentation patterns that antisenseChs constructs do not. Long-term monitoring for epigenetic variations in one population of 44 senseChs transgenotes showed that 43 (98%) were capable of producing a cosuppression phenotype. The primary determinant of sense-specific patterns of cosuppression ofChs was found to be the repetitiveness and organization pattern of the transgene, not ‘position effects’ by, or ‘readthrough’ from, flanking plant DNA sequences. The degree of cosuppression observed in progeny of transgenotes carrying multiple, dispersed copies as compared to that observed with a single copy of the transgene suggests that sense cosuppression ofChs is subject to a transgene dosage effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Carvalho F, Gheysen G, Kushnir S, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Castresana C: Suppression of β-1,3-glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. EMBO J 11: 2595–2602 (1992).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Carvalho Niebel F, Frendo P, Van Montagu M, Cornelissen M: Post-transcriptional cosuppression of β-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of nuclear mRNA. Plant Cell 7: 347–358 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–21 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dorer DR, Henikoff S: Expansions of transgene repeats cause heterochromatin formation and gene silencing inDrosophila. Cell 77: 993–1002 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grierson D, Fray RG, Hamilton AJ, Smith CJS, Watson CF: Does co-suppression of sense genes in transgenic plants involve antisense RNA? Trends Biotechnol 9: 122–123 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones JDG, Shlumukov L, Carland F, English J, Scofield SR, Bishop GJ, Harrison K: Effective vectors for transformation, expression of heterologous genes, and assaying transposon excision in transgenic plants. Transgen Res 1: 285–297 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jorgensen R: Elicitation of organized pigmentation patterns by a chalcone synthase transgene. In: Amasino RM (ed) Cellular Communication in Plants. pp. 87–92. Plenum Press, New York (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jorgensen R: Developmental significance of epigenetic impositions on the plant genome: a paragenetic function for chromosomes. Devel Genet 15: 523–532 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jorgensen RA: Cosuppression, flower color patterns, and metastable gene expression states. Science 268: 686–691 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jorgensen RA, Napoli CA: A responsive regulatory system is revealed by sense suppression of pigment genes inPetunia flowers. In: Gustafson JP, Flavell RB (eds) Genomes, Proceedings of the 22nd Stadler Genetics Symposium, Plenum Press, New York (in press).

  11. Lindbo JA, Silva-Rosales L, Proebsting WM, Dougherty WG: Induction of a highly specific antiviral state in transgenic plants: implications for gene regulation and virus resistance. Plant Cell 5: 1749–1759 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Matzke MA, Primig M, Tronovsky J, Matzke AJM: Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. EMBO J 8: 643–649 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matzke MA, Matzke AJM: How and why do plants inactivate homologous transgenes. Plant Physiol 107: 679–685 (1995).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matzke AJM, Neuhuber F, Park Y-D, Ambros PF, Matzke MA: Homology-dependent gene silencing in transgenic plants: epistatic silencing loci contain multiple copies of methylated transgenes. Mol Gen Genet 244: 219–229 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MeinsJr. F, Kunz C: Gene silencing in transgenic plants: a heuristic autoregulation model. Curr Topics Microbiol Immunol 197: 105–120 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murray MG, Thompson WF: Isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 4321–4325 (1980).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Napoli C, Lemieux C, Jorgensen R: Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible cosuppression of homologous genesin trans. Plant Cell 2: 279–289 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor LP, Jorgensen R: Conditional male fertility in chalcone synthase-deficient petunia. J Hered 83: 11–17 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  19. van Blokland R, van der Geest N, Mol JNM, Kooter JM: Transgene-mediated suppression inPetunia hybrida results from an increase in RNA turnover. Plant J 6: 861–877 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jorgensen, R.A., Cluster, P.D., English, J. et al. Chalcone synthase cosuppression phenotypes in petunia flowers: comparison of sense vs. antisense constructs and single-copy vs. complex T-DNA sequences. Plant Mol Biol 31, 957–973 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040715

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040715

Key words

Navigation