Skip to main content
Log in

Morphogenetic responses from in vitro cultured seedling explants of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The morphogenetic responses of seedling explants of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek cv ML-5) were studied in vitro. Direct induction of shoots/plants was possible from shoot tip, cotyledon and cotyledonary node explants. Dedifferentiation of the explants viz; Shoot tip, cotyledons, cotyledonary node, primordial leaves and roots was obtained on basal medium supplemented with auxin and cytokinin. Shoot regeneration was limited to primary calli while rhizogenesis was of common occurrence in established calli. In addition to differences in hormonal requirements, the various explants showed preferential growth in different basal media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bajaj YPS and Gosal SS (1981). Induction of genetic variability in grain legumes through tissue culture. In Proc. Costed Symp. On Tissue Culture of Economically important Plants Ed. AN Rao, National Univ. of Singapore, pp. 25–40.

  2. Barwale UB, Kerns HR and Widholm JM (1986). Plant regeneration from callus cultures of several soybean genotypes via embryogenesis and organogenesis. Planta 167: 473–481.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bingham ET and Saunders JW (1974). Chromosome manipulations in alfalfa: scaling the cultivated tetraploid to seven ploidy levels. Crop Sci. 14: 474–477.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boulter D and Crocomo OH (1979). Plant Cell Culture Implications: Legumes In Plant Cell and Tissue Culture. Principles and Applications Ed. WRSharp, POLarsen, EFPaddock and VRaghavan, Ohio State Univ. Press, Ohio, pp. 615–631.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng TY, Saka H and Voqui-Dinh TH (1980). Plant regeneration from Soybean cotyledonary node segments in culture plant Sci. Lett 19: 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cuddihy AE and Bottino JP (1982). Winged bean protoplasts: isolation and culture to callus. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 1: 201–209.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davies DR (1983). Chimerism in irradiated dicotyledonous plants. IN: Chimerism in irradiated dicotyledons plants. Report of a consultant meeting of Joint FAO/IAEA Div. 1981. Vienna: IAEA, pp. 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goel S, Mudgal AK and Gupta SC (1983). Development of plants from in vitro cultured shoot tips of Vigna mungo and Vigna radiata Tropical Plant Science Research 1: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gresshoff PM and Mohapatra SS (1981). Legume Cell and Tissue Culture. In Proc. Costed Symp. on Tissue Culture of Economically Important Plants. Ed. AN Rao. National Univ. of Singapore. pp. 11–23.

  10. Haque MM, Hoque MR, Begum A and Islam AS (1984). Regeneration of multiple shoots from shoot tip culture of Vigna mungo L. Hepper. In Int. Symp on Genetic manipulation of Crop Plants. Absts. Beijing. China: pp. 64.

  11. Kunakh VA, Alkhimova EG, Voitjuk LI and Alpatova LK (1984). Obtaining of tissue cultures and organogenesis induction in Pisum sativum L. In Proc. Int. Symp. Plant Tissue and Cell Culture Application to Crop Improvement. Ed. FJNovak, LHavel and JDolezel. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Praque. pp. 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mathews VH and Rao PS (1984). In vitro production of multiple seedlings from single seeds of mung bean (Vigna radiata L Wilczek) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 113: 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miller CO (1965). Evidence for the natural occurrence of zeatin and derivatives: compounds from maize which promote cell division. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 54: 1052–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mohan Ram HY, Mehta U and Ramanuja Rao (1981). Tissue and protoplast culture and plant regeneration in legumes. In. Proc. COSTED Symp. on Tissue Culture of Economically Important Plants, Ed. AN Rao. National Univ. of Singapore. pp. 66–69.

  15. Mroginski LA and Kartha KK (1984). Tissue Culture of legumes for Crop Improvement. In. Plant Breeding Reviews Ed. JJanick. The AVI Publishing Co. Inc. USA. pp. 215–264.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murashige T and Skoog F (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nitsch JP (1951). Growth and development in vitro of excised ovaries. Am. J. Bot. 38: 566–577.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips GC and Collins GB (1979). In vitro tissue cultures of selected legumes and plant regeneration from callus cultures of red clover. Crop. Sci. 19: 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rubulo A, Kartha KK, Mroginski LA and Dick J (1984). Plant regeneration from pea leaflets cultured in vitro and genetic stability of regenerants. J. Plant Physiol. 117: 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saccardo F (1983). Chimera formation in M1 pea plants raised from mutagen treated seeds. In: Chimerism in irradiated dicotyledonous plants. Report of a consultants meeting of Joint FAO/IAEA Div. 1981. Vienna: IAEA. pp. 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathews, H. Morphogenetic responses from in vitro cultured seedling explants of mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 11, 233–240 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040429

Key words

Navigation