Skip to main content
Log in

The interpretation of Nei and Shannon-Weaver within population variation indices

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The description of variation in populations is of great importance for plant breeders and gene bank researchers. The Nei and Shannon-Weaver within population variation indices are reviewed in this paper. The authors reject the use of the Shannon-Weaver index as an index for measuring variation.

General conclusions about the amount of variation in a population should not be drawn from a few characters, because there is no association between the amount of variation for different characters. Such conclusions are only valid for the considered characters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asins, M.J. & E.A., Carbonell, 1987. Concepts involved in measuring genetic variability and its importance in conservation of plant genetic recources. Evolutionary Trends in Plants 1 (1): 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A.H.D. & B.S., Weir, 1983. Measuring genetic variability in plant populations. In: S.D., Tanksley & T.J., Orton (Eds). Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding, Part A. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R., 1974. A note on Nei's Measure of Gene Diversity in a substructured Population. Humangenetik 21: 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damania, A.B., E., Porceddu & M.T., Jackson, 1983. A rapid method for the evaluation of variation in germplasm collections of cereals using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Euphytica 32: 877–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld, R., H.B., Becker & J.B., Biezen, 1982. Aspecten van statistisch gedrag van diversiteitsmaten. Vakbl. Biol. 62 (12): 230–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, S.K., C.O., Qualset, G.M., Bhatt & K.K., Wu, 1975. Geographical Patterns of Phenotypic Diversity in a World Collection of Durum Wheats. Crop Sci. 15: 700–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monster, E.M., 1988. Unpublished research report. Dept. of Plant Breeding, Agric. Univ. Typescript 80p.

  • Nei, M., 1973. Analysis of Gene Diversity in Subdivided Populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70 (12): 3321–3323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. In: A., Neuberger & E.L., Tatum (Eds). Frontiers of Biology Vol. 40. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, New York. pp. 127–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K., 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachl, R., 1975. Die Landweizen des westliches Alpenvorlandes. Doctor's Dissertation. Linz. Mimeographed. 147 p.

  • Shannon, C.E. & W., Weaver, 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois. Urbana, Chicago, London. pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163: 688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G.W. & W.G., Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods. Sixth edition. The Iowa State University Press. Ames, Iowa, USA. p82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, D.M., C.O., Qualset, S.K., Jain & J.C., Craddock, 1979. A diversity analysis of a world collection of barley. Crop. Sci. 19: 789–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven, A.C., 1987. Onderzoek op het IvP naar de mate van fenotypische and genotypische variatie bij landrassen. Prophyta 9: 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven, A.C. & R., Schachl, 1989. Groups of bread wheat landraces in Austrian alps. Euphytica 41: 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hennink, S., Zeven, A.C. The interpretation of Nei and Shannon-Weaver within population variation indices. Euphytica 51, 235–240 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039724

Key words

Navigation