Summary
The claim that first division restitution gametes are produced through the ‘unique meiotic abnormality’ of ‘parallel spindle’ formation at anaphase II of microsporogenesis in Solanum species appears to be not justified. An examination of the phenomenon of meiotic nuclear restitution in fifty-six diploid Solanum clones revealed that the parallel orientation of spindles either at metaphase or anaphae II does not necessarily lead to dyad or unreduced microspore formation. However, the ‘fused spindle’ formation at metaphase II of microsporogenesis invariably leads to dyad and unreduced microspore formation. The 2n gametes produced through fused spindles may be genetically equivalent to first division restitution gametes, and therefore, they may be useful in potato breeding. In addition to fused spindle formation, at least three other types of meiotic abnormalities that could lead to 2n gamete formation were also observed. Although any one, or two, of these mechanisms were predominantly observed in certain clones, it was by no means certain that other mechanisms did not operate in these clones at the same time, or at a later stage. Because of the great modifying influence of environment on the process of meiosis, and meiotic nuclear restitution, it might be erroneous to conclude that one or the other meiotic nuclear restitution mechanism alone operates at a time in a given clone. In order to elucidate the genetic basis of 2n gamete formation in potato, it is desirable (i) to answer whether there are exclusive genetic mechanisms for the formation of first or second division restitution gametes; (ii) to establish reliable cytological criteria for their detection; and (iii) to determine the effect of environmental factors on the occurrence of different mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackburn, K. B. & J. W. H. Harrison, 1921. The status of the British Rose forms as determined by their cytological behaviour. Ann. Bot. 35: 159–188.
Bleier, H., 1931. Untersuchungen über die Sterilität der Kartoffel. Arch. Pflanzenbau 5: 545–560.
Dillawijn, C. van, 1941. Zytologische Studien in der Gattung Populus L. Genetica 22: 131–182.
Dodds, K. S. & N. W. Simmonds, 1946. Genetical and cytological studies of Musa. VIII. The formation of polyploid spores. J. Genet. 47: 223–241.
Ellison, W., 1937. Polyploid gamete formation in diploid Avena. J. Genet. 34: 287–295.
Fukuda, Y., 1927. Cytological studies on the development of pollen grains in different races of Solanum tuberosum L. with special reference to sterility. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 41: 459–474.
Gustafsson, Å., 1935. Studies on the mechanism of parthenogenesis. Hereditas 21: 1–111.
Harlan, J. R. & J. M. J. de Wet, 1975. On Ö. Winge and a prayer: The origins of polyploidy. Bot. Rev. 41: 361–390.
Hermsen, J. G. Th. & J. Verdenius, 1973. Selection from Solanum tuberosum group Phureja of genotypes combining high-frequency haploid induction with homozygosity for embryo-spot. Euphytica 22: 244–259.
Hermsen, J. G. Th., J. Olsder, P. Janssen & E. Hoving, 1974. Acceptance of self-compatible pollen from Solanum verrucosum in dihaploids from S. tuberosum. In: H. F. Linskens (Ed.), Fertilization in higher plants, p. 37.
Heslop-Harrison, J., 1971. Wall pattern formation in angiosperm microsporogenesis. Symp. Soc. Expt. Biol. 277–300.
Höglund, M., 1970. Meiosis in Solanum phureja. Hereditas 66: 183–188.
Irikura, Y., 1976. Cytogenetic studies on the haploid plants of tuber-bearing Solanum species. II. Cytogenetical investigations on haploid plants and interspecific hybrids utilizing haploidy. Res. Bull. Hokkaido Nat. Agr. Expt. Stn. No. 115: 1–80.
Ivanovskaja, E. V., 1941. Cytological analysis of hybrids between diploid and tetraploid species of potato. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR ser. Biol. 1: 21–33.
Jackson, M. T., P. R. Rowe & J. G. Hawkes, 1978. Crossability relationships of Andean potato varieties of three ploidy levels. Euphytica 27: 541–551.
Jacobsen, E., 1976. Cytological studies on diplandroid production in a dihaploid potato clone and its correlation with seed set in 4x × 2x crosses. Z. Pfl. Zücht. 77: 10–15.
Jørgensen, C. A., 1928. The experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genus Solanum. J. Genet. 19: 133–210.
Karpechenko, G. D., 1927. The production of polyploid gametes in hybrids. Hereditas 9: 349–368.
Kidane-Mariam, H. M. & S. J. Peloquin, 1972. Method of diplandroid formation and yield of progeny from reciprocal (4x × 2x) crosses. Amer. Potato J. 49: 363–364.
Kidane. Mariam, H. M. & S. J. Peloquin, 1974. Effect of direction of hybridization (4x × 2x or 2x × 4x) on yield in cultivated potatoes. Am. Potato J. 51: 330–336.
Koopmans, A. & A. H. van der Burg, 1952. Chromosome number and chromosome behaviour of F1 and F2 plants of the cross Solanum phureja x Solanum tuberosum. Genetica 26: 102–116.
Ljungdahl, H., 1922. Zur Zytologie der Gattung Papaver. Vorläufige Mitteilung. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 16: 103–114.
Marks, G. E., 1966. The origin and significance of intraspecific polyploidy: Experimental evidence from Solanum chacoense. Evolution 20: 552–557.
McClintock, B., 1929. A cytological and genetical study of triploid maize. Genetics 14: 180–222.
Mendiburu, A. O., 1971. The significance of 2n gametes in potato breeding and genetics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
Mendiburu, A. O. & S. J. Peloquin, 1969. Half-tetrad analysis in potato by means of 4x × 2x crosses. Am. Potato J. 46: 438.
Mendiburu, A. O. & S. J. Peloquin, 1977. Bilateral sexual polyploidization in potatoes. Euphytica 26: 573–583.
Meurman, O. & G. Ranken, 1932. Untersuchungen über die Chromosomenverhältmisse bei kultivierten Kartoffelsorten. Soc. Scientiarum Fenica Connectatione, Biologiae 3: 1–27.
Mok, D. W. S. & S. J. Peloquin, 1974. Genetic evidence of FDR and SDR diplandrogenesis in diploid potatoes and the mapping of S locus. Am. Potato J. 51: 279–280.
Mok, D. W. S. & S. J. Peloquin, 1975a. Three mechanisms of 2n pollen formation in diploid potatoes. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17: 217–225.
Mok, D. W. S. & S. J. Peloquin, 1975b. The inheritance of three mechanisms of diplandroid (2n pollen) formation in diploid potatoes. Heredity 35: 295–302.
Mok, D. W. S. & S. J. Peloquin, 1975c. Breeding value of 2n pollen (diplandroids) in tetraploid x diploid crosses in potato. T.A.G. 46: 307–314.
Mok, D. W. S., S. J. Peloquin & A. O. Mendiburu, 1976. Genetic evidence for mode of 2n pollen and Slocus mapping in potatoes. Potato Res. 19: 157–164.
Müntzing, A., 1933. Studies on meiosis in diploid and triploid Solanum tuberosum L. Hereditas 17: 223–245.
Müntzing, A., 1936. The chromosomes of giant Populus tremulus. Hereditas 21: 381–393.
Müntzing, A., 1940. Further studies on apomixis and sexuality in Poa. Hereditas 26: 115–190.
Okabe, S., 1932. Parthenogenesis bei Ixeris dentata. Bot. Mag. Tokya 46: 518–532.
Olah, L. von, 1938. Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der Gattung Solanum Sect. Tuberarium. III. Solanum commersonii Dun. und einige seiner Bastarde. Z. indukt. Abstam.-u. Vererblehre 74: 228–241.
Oppenheimer, H. Ch., 1933. Cytogenetische Untersuchungen an Bastarden knollentragender Solanum-Arten. I. Solanum chacoense BITT x Solanum tuberosum L. s. Str. Z. indukt. Abstam.-u. Vererblehre 65: 72–98.
Peloquin, S. J. & A. O. Mendiburu, 1972. Sexual polyploidization in relation to breeding and evolution. Am. Potato J. 49: 363.
Prakken, R. & M. S. Swaminathan, 1952. Cytological behaviour of some interspecific hybrids in the genus Solanum sect. Tuberarium. Genetica 26: 77–101.
Propach, H., 1938. Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der Gattung Solanum, Sect. Tuberarium. IV. Tetraploide und sesquiploide Artbastarde. Z. Vererbungsl. 74: 376–387.
Prywer, C., 1931. Badania cytologiczne nad burakiem cukrowyn (Beta vulgaris L. v. Saccharifera), (English summary). Acta Soc. Bot. Polon. 8: 19–46.
Quinn, A. A., D. W. S. Mok & S. J. Peloquin, 1974. Distribution and significance of diplandroids among the diploid Solanums. Am. Potato J. 51: 16–21.
Ramanna, M. S., 1974. The origin of unreduced microspores due to aberrant cytokinesis in the meiocytes of potato and its genetic significance. Euphytica 23: 20–30.
Ramanna, M. S. & J. G. Th. Hermsen, 1979. Unique meiotic behaviour in F1-plants from a cross between a non-tuberous and a tuberous Solanum species in Subsection Petota. Euphytica 29: 9–15.
Rosenberg, O., 1927. Die Semiheterotypische Teilung und Ihre Bedeutung für die Entstehung verdoppelter Chromozomenzahlen. Hereditas 8: 30–5–358.
Simon, P. W. & S. J. Peloquin, 1976. Pollen vigour as a function of mode of 2n gamete formation in potatoes. J. Heredity 67: 204–208.
Spearman, C., 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Amer. J. Psych. 15: 88.
Stanely, R. G. & H. F. Linskens, 1974. Pollen: biology, biochemistry, management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Stebbins, G. L. Jr., 1932. Cytology of Antennaria. II. Parthegonenetic species. Bot. Gaz. 94: 322–344.
Stelzner, G., 1943. Wege zur züchterischen Nutzung des Käferresistenter Kartoffelsoren. Züchter 15: 33–38.
Stow, I., 1927. A cytological study of pollen sterility in Solanum tuberosum L. Jap. J. Bot. 3: 217–238.
Sudheer, P. (C. P. Caroll), 1977. The use of hybridization between diploid South American and tetraploid European potatoes in a breeding programme. Proc. 8th Eucarpia Congres, Madrid, 1977, 313–320.
Wterkeyen, L., 1961. Les parois microsporocytairs de nature callosique chez Helloborus et Tradescantia. La Cellule 62: 225–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramanna, M.S. A re-examination of the mechanisms of 2n gamete formation in potato and its implications for breeding. Euphytica 28, 537–561 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038921
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038921