Skip to main content
Log in

Models for the analysis of species' response to environmental gradients

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A procedural model for vegetation analysis is presented. Suggestions are made that analysis methods can test theory as well as examine vegetation-environment correlations. Gauch and Whittaker's propositions regarding species behavioural properties expected for an individualistic continuum are tested on a eucalypt forest data set. The data set is carefully stratified to control environmental heterogeneity. The shape and distribution of species response curves are then examined along a temperature gradient using 750 sites. The conclusions are:

  1. (1)

    Bell shaped response curves to environmental gradients are not universal

  2. (2)

    Positive-skewed curves are characteristic of major canopy species in eucalypt forest in southern New South Wales

  3. (3)

    Species richness increases with temperature along the gradient

  4. (4)

    Tests of other propositions regarding species modes and ranges are confounded by the change in species richness along the gradients

  5. (5)

    More rigorous statistical analysis and analyses on other vegetation types are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramsky Z. & Rosenzweig M. L., 1984. Tilman's predicted productivity—diversity relationship shown by desert rodents. Nature 309: 150–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., 1976. On non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33: 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio 42: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., 1981. The role of diversity problems in vegetation classification. In: A. N.Gillison & D. J.Anderson (eds), Vegetation classification in Australia, pp 125–139. ANU Press: Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., 1984. Problems of vegetation analysis for nature conservation. In: K.Myers, C. R.Margules & I.Musto (eds), Survey methods for nature conservation, pp 101–130. CSIRO Division of Water and Land Resources, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., 1985. Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P. & Austin B. O., 1980. Behaviour of experimental plant communities along a nutrient gradient. J. Ecol. 68: 891–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P. & Greig-Smith P., 1968. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. II. Some methodological problems of data from rainforest. J. Ecol. 56: 827–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., Cunningham R. B. & Good R. B., 1983. Altitudinal distribution in relation to other environmental factors of several Eucalypt species in southern New South Wales. Aust. J. Ecol. 8: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P., Cunningham R. B. & Fleming P. M., 1984. New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures. Vegetatio 55: 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J. J., 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Amer. Nat. 124: 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clymo R. S., 1980. Preliminary survey of the peat-bog Hummell Knowe Moss using various numerical methods. Vegetatio 42: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D. P., Minchin P. R. & Belbin L., 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fresco L. F. M., 1982. An analysis of species response curves and of competition from field data: some results from heath vegetation. Vegetatio 48: 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • GauchJr H. G., 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • GauchJr H. G. & Whittaker R. H., 1972. Coenocline simulation. Ecology 53: 446–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • GauchJr H. G. & Whittaker R. H., 1976. Simulation of community patterns. Vegetatio 33: 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason H. A., 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall D. W., 1970. Statistical plant ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P., 1983. Quantitative plant ecology. 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J. P., 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242: 344–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J. P., 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper J. L., 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kershaw K. A. & Looney J. H. H., 1985. Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology, 3rd ed. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R. & Lewontin R., 1980. Dialectics and reductionism in ecology. In: E.Saarinen (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Ecology, pp 107–138. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C. R., Nicholls, A. O. & Austin, M. P. (in press). Diversity of Eucalyptus species predicted by a multi-variable environmental gradient. Oecologia.

  • Minchin P. R., 1987. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 00: 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D. & Ellenberg H., 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I., 1971. Multivariate analysis of semi-arid vegetation in south-eastern Australia: Nodal ordination by component analysis. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 6: 159–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I. & Van derMaarel E., 1987. Relations between community theory and community analysis in vegetation science: some historical perspectives. Vegetatio 69: 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R. K., 1978. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: patterns of species diversity. Vegetatio 37: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt G. W., 1983. Roles: their limits and responsibilities in ecological and evolutionary research. Am. Nat. 122: 697–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart H. H., 1984. A theory of forest dynamics. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong D. R., 1983. Natural variability and the manifold mechanisms of ecological communities. Am. Nat. 122: 636–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J. M. A., 1970. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetation data. Ecology 51: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D., 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey J. W., 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van derMaarel E., 1976. On the establishment of plant community boundaries. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 89: 415–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittaker R. H., 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. H., 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. H., 1975. Communities and ecosystems, 2nd ed. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. H. (ed.), 1978. Ordination of plant communities. Handbook of Vegetation Science 5. 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker R. H. & Niering W. A., 1965. Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A gradient analysis of the south slope. Ecology 46: 429–452.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I thank my colleagues A. O. Nicholls and C. R. Margules for collaboration in collecting data and analysis, and P. R. Minchin, D. P. Faith, C. R. Margules and E. Van der Maarel for comments on the manuscript. Thanks are also due to J. L. Stein for assistance with the analysis and numerous Australian ecologists who have made their data available to me.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Austin, M.P. Models for the analysis of species' response to environmental gradients. Vegetatio 69, 35–45 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038685

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038685

Keywords

Navigation