Abstract
This one-time greenhouse study examined the phenology, morphology, frost hardiness and response to moisture stress of three Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) stocktypes from the same seed lot. The types were mini-plugTM transplants (MPT), 1+1 bareroot transplants (1+1), and 2+0 bareroot seedlings (2+0). In late summer and fall before lifting, 2+0 seedling set bud before 1+1 seedlings, 1+1 seedlings before MPT seedlings. The 2+0 seedlings appeared slowest to acquire frost hardiness in fall and seemed to deharden most rapidly in spring. Although the 2+0 seedlings were taller than the MPT stocktype, MPT and 2+0 seedlings were relatively similar in other morphological respects, but 1+1 seedlings were much larger. All stocktypes were potted on January 20, 1989, placed in a greenhouse, and subjected to 39%, 18%, 16%, or 6% soil water content (% dry weight) until the end of the experiment in mid-July 1990. The largest decrease in pre-dawn xylem water potential occurred with 16% and 6% soil water content; pre-dawn xylem water potential averaged over the three stocktypes generally declined 219% from low to high soil moisture stress. The 1+1 seedlings used more water than the other two stocktypes, and at maximum soil moisture stress, plant moisture stress increased in the order: MPT <2+0<1+1. During the 6-month greenhouse experiment, the larger 1+1 stocktype showed the most absolute growth, but the smaller stocktypes grew more on a relative scale. Growth of the stocktypes appeared to be related to differences in morphology and water-use patterns as the seedlings competed for available water within each pot. The results show that MPT seedlings, a new stocktype, performed as well as the more traditionally used 2+0 and 1+1 seedlings and that stocktype selection is important in reforestation efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnott J. T. and Burdett A. N. 1988. Early growth of planted western hemlock in relation to stock type and controlled-release fertilizer application. Can. J. Forest Res. 18: 710–717.
Boyer J. N. and South D. B. 1989. Seasonal changes in intensity of bud dormancy in loblolly pine seedlings. Tree Physiol. 5: 379–385.
Burdett A. N. 1979. A non-destructive method for measuring the volume of intact plant parts. Can. J. Forest Res. 9: 120–122.
Cannell M. G. R., Thompson S. and Lines R. 1976. An analysis of inherent differences in shoot growth within some north temperate conifers, pp. 173–205. In: Cannell M. G. R. and Last F. T. (Eds) Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement. Academic Press, London.
Carlson W.C. 1986. Root system considerations in the quality of loblolly pine seedlings. South. J. Appl. Forestry 10: 87–92.
Carlson W. C. and Preisig C. L. 1981. Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on the shoot and root development of Douglas-fir seedlings. Can. J. Forest Res. 11: 230–242.
Cleary B. D., Greaves R. D. and Owston P. W. 1978. Seedlings, pp. 63–97. In: Cleary B. D., Greaves R. D. and Hermann R. K. (Eds) Regenerating Oregon's Forests. Oregon State Univ. Ext. Serv., Corvallis.
Clements J. R. 1970. Shoot responses of young red pine to watering applied over two seasons. Can. J. Bot. 48: 75–80.
Cole E. C. and Newton M. 1987. Fifth-year responses of Douglas-fir to crowding and nonconiferous competition. Can. J. Forest Res. 17: 181–186.
Day R. J. and MacGillivray G. R. 1975. Root regeneration of fall-lifted white spruce nursery stock in relation to soil moisture content. Forestry Chron. 51: 196–199.
DeWald, L. E. and Feret, P. P. 1985. Genetic variation in loblolly pine root growth potential, pp. 155–162. In: Proceedings, 18th South. Forest Tree Improv. Conf. South. Forest Tree Improve. Comm. Sponsored Publ. 40. Gulfport, Mississippi.
Duryea M. L. 1984. Nursery cultural practices: impacts on seedling quality, pp. 143–164. In: Duryea M. L. and Landis T. D. (Eds) Forest Nursery Manual, Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston Lancaster for Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis.
Glerum C. 1985. Frost hardiness of coniferous seedlings: principles and applications, pp. 107–123. In: Duryea M. L. (Ed) Proceedings, Evaluation Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. Forest Res., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis.
Glerum C. and Pierpoint G. 1968. The influence of soil moisture deficits on seedling growth of three coniferous species. Forestry Chron. 44: 26–29.
Harrington, T. B. and Tappeiner, J. C., II. 1991. Competition affects shoot morphology, growth duration, and relative growth rates of Douglas-fir saplings. Can. J. Forest Res. (in press).
Hee S. M., Stevens T. S. and Walch D. C. 1988. Production aspects of mini-plugTM transplants, pp. 168–171. In: Landis T. D. (Tech. coord.) Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA Forest Serv., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167.
Hobbs S. D., Lavender D. P. and Wearstler K. A. 1982. Performance of container-grown Douglas-fir on droughty sites in southwest Oregon, pp. 373–378. In: Scarratt J. B., Glerum C. and Plexman C. A. (Eds) Proceedings, Canadian Containerized Tree Seedling Symposium. Dep. Environ., Can. Forestry Serv., Great Lakes Forest Res. Cent., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.
Kaufmann M. R. 1977. Soil temperature and drought effects on growth of Monterey pine. Forest Sci. 23: 317–325.
Kaushal P. and Aussenac G. 1989. Transplanting shock in Corsican pine and cedar of Atlas seedlings: internal water deficits, growth and root regeneration. Forest Ecol. Manage. 27: 29–40.
Lavender D. P. 1985. Bud dormancy, pp. 7–15. In: Duryea M. L. (Ed) Proceedings, Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis.
McCreary D. D. and Duryea M. L. 1985. OSU vigor test: principles, procedures, and predictive ability, pp. 85–92. In: Duryea M. L. (Ed) Proceedings, Evaluating Seedling Quality: Principles, Procedures, and Predictive Abilities of Major Tests. Forest Res. Lab., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis.
Reitveld W. J. 1989. Transplanting stress in bareroot conifer seedlings: its development and progression to establishment. North J. Appl. Forestry 6: 99–107.
Ritchie G. A. 1984. Assessing seedling quality, pp. 243–259. In: Duryea M. L. and Landis T. D. (Eds) Forest Nursery Manual, Production of Bareroot Seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston Lancaster for Forest Res. Lab. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis.
Ritchie G. A. 1986. Relationships among bud dormancy, cold hardiness, and stress resistance in 2+0 Douglas-fir. New Forests 1: 29–42.
Rose R., Carlson W. C. and Morgan P. 1990. The target seedling concept, pp. 1–8. In: Rose R., Campbell S. J., and Landis T. D. (Eds) Target Seedling Symposium: Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Association. USDA Forest Serv., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-200.
Sands R. 1984. Transplanting stress in radiata pine. Aust. Forest Res. 14: 67–72.
Scholander P. F., Hammel H. T., Bradstreet D. and Hemmingsen E. A. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339–346.
Seiler J. R. and Cazell B. H. 1990. Influence of water stress on the physiology and growth of red spruce seedlings. Tree Physiol. 6: 69–77.
Tanaka Y., Carrier B., Dobkowski A., Figueroa P. and Meade R. 1988. Field performance of mini-plugTM transplants, pp. 168–171. In: Landis T. D. (Tech. coord.) Proceedings, Combined Meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations. USDA Forest Serv., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Exp. Sta., Fort Collins, Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-167.
Timmis R. 1980. Stress resistance and quality criteria for tree seedlings: analysis, measurement, and use. N.Z.J. Forestry Sci. 10: 21–53.
Tuttle C. L., South D. B., Golden M. S. and Meldahl R. S. 1988. Initial Pinus taeda seedling height relationships with early survival and growth. Can. J. Forest Res. 18: 867–871.
White T. L. 1987. Drought tolerance of southwestern Oregon Douglas-fir. Forest Sci. 33: 283–293.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, R., Gleason, J.F. & Atkinson, M. Morphological and water-stress characteristics of three Douglas-fir stocktypes in relation to seedling performance under different soil moisture conditions. New Forest 7, 1–17 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037468
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037468