Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty-five individually transformed clonal tobacco callus lines were simultaneously assayed for both chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) activity resulting from expression of introduced reporter genes driven by the adjacent and divergent mannopine (mas) promoters. Excluding lines in which one or both of the enzyme activities was essentially zero, the activities of the reporter genes varied by as much as a factor of 136 (CAT) and 175 (GUS) between individual transformants. Superimposed upon the high degree of inter-clonal expression variability was an intra-clonal variability of 3–4-fold. The observed degree of intra-clonal reporter gene activity may be more extreme because of the regulatory characteristics of the mannopine promoters, but must still be addressed when considering the limitations of reporter gene-based analysis of transgene function and structure. There was no consistent correlation between the expression levels of the introduced CAT and GUS genes since the ratio of GUS to CAT activities (nmol min-1 mg-1) within individual lines varied from 0.05 to 49. Even divergent transcription from two directly adjacent promoter regions (both contained within a 479 bp TR-DNA fragment) is insufficient to guarantee concurrent expression of two linked transgenes. Our quantitative data were compared to published data of transgene expression variability to examine the overall distribution of expression levels in individual transformants. The resulting frequency distribution indicates that most transformants express introduced transgenes at relatively low levels, suggesting that a potentially large number ofAgrobacterium-mediated transformation events may result in silent transgenes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amasino RM, Powell ALT, Gordon MP: Changes in T-DNA methylation and expression are associated with phenotypic variation and plant regeneration in a crown gall tumor line. Mol Gen Genet 297: 437–446 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. An G, Ebert PR, Mitra A, Ha JB: Binary vectors. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant Molecular Biology Manual, pp A3/1-A3/19. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. An G, Watson BD, Stachel S, Gordon MP, Nester EW: New cloning vehicles for transformation of higher plants. EMBO J 4: 277–284 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. An G: Development of plant promoter expression vectors and their use for analysis of differential activity of nopaline synthase promoter in transformed tobacco cells. Plant Physiol 81: 86–91 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bassiri A, Carlson PS: Isozyme patterns and differences in plant parts and their callus cultures in common bean. Crop Sci 19: 955–958 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bennetzen JL: Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize. Mol Gen Genet 208: 45–51 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandler VL, Talbert LE, Raymond F: Sequence, genomic distribution and DNA modification of a Mu1 element from non-mutator maize stocks. Genetics 119: 951–958 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chandler VL, Walbot V: DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 1767–1771 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chomet PS, Wessler S, Dellaporta SL: Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activater (Ac) is associated with its DNA methylation. EMBO J 6: 295–302 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coates D, Taliercio EW, Gelvin SB: Chromatin structure of integrated T-DNA in crown gall tumors. Plant Mol Biol 8: 159–168 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Czernilofsky AP, Hain R, Herrera-Estrella L, Horst L, Goyvaerts E, Baker BJ, Schell J: Fate of selectable marker DNA integrated into the genome ofNicotiana tabacum. DNA 5: 101–113 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Almeida ERP, Gossele V, Muller CG, Dockx Jan, Reynaerts A, Botterman J, Krebbers E, Timko MP: Transgenic expression of two marker genes under the control of anArabidopsis rbcS promoter: Sequences encoding the rubisco transit peptide increase expression levels. Mol Gen Genet 218: 78–86 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dean C, Favreau M, Tamaki S, Bond-Nutter D, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J: Expression of tandem gene fusions in transgenic tobacco plants. Nucl Acids Res 16: 7601–7617 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dean C, Jones J, Favreau M, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J: Influence of flanking sequences on variability in expression levels of an introduced gene in transgenic tobacco plants. Nucl Acid Res 16: 9267–9282 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. DeRita VJ, Gelvin SB: Deletion analysis of the mannopine synthase gene promoter in sunflower crown gall tumors andAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Mol Gen Genet 207: 233–241 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12(1) 13–15 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J, Bond-Nuttler D, Dean C, Gidoni D, Jones J: The expression of introduced genes in regenerated plants. In: Setlow J, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods, vol. 1 pp. 45–58. Plenum Press, New York (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fang R-X, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S, Chua N-H: Multiplecis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1: 141–150 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fluhr R, Kuhlemeier CF, Nagy F, Chua N-H: Organspecific and light-induced expression of plant genes. Science 232: 1106–1112 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Forrester WC, Takegawa S, Papayannopoulou T, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Groudine M: Evidence for a locus activation region: the formation of developmentally stable hypersensitive sites in globin-expressing hybrids. Nucl Acids Res 15: 10159–10177 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gendloff EH, Bowen B, Buchholz WG: Quantitation of chloramphenicol acetyl transferase in transgenic tobacco by ELISA and correlation with gene copy number. Plant Mol Biol 14: 575–583 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gidoni D, Bond-Nutter D, Brosio P, Jones J, Bedbrook J, Dunsmuir P: Coordinated expression between two photosynthetic petunia genes in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 211: 507–514 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grosvelt F, van Assendelft GB, Greaves DR, Kollias G: Position-independent, high-level expression of the human β-globin gene in transgenic mice. Cell 51: 975–985 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gruenbaum Y, Naveh-Many T, Ceder H, Razin A: Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292: 860–862 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hepburn AG, Clarke LE, Pearson L, White J: The role of cytosine methylation in the control of nopaline synthase gene expression in a plant tumor. J Mol Appl Genet 2: 315–329 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jefferson RA, Burgess SM, Hirsh D: β-glucuronidase fromEscherichia coli as a gene-fusion marker. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 8447–8451 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jefferson RA: Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5: 387–405 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones JDG, Dunsmuir P, Bedbrook J: High level expression of introduced chimaeric genes in regenerated transformed plants. EMBO J 4: 2411–2418 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jones JDG, Gilbert DE, Grady KL, Jorgensen RA: T-DNA structure and gene expression in petunia plants transformed byAgrobacterium tumefaciens C58 derivatives. Mol Gen Genet 207: 478–485 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Junghans H, Metzlaff M: A simple and rapid method for the preparation of total plant DNA. Biotechniques 8: 176 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kozak M: Point mutations define as sequence flanking the AUG initiator codon that modulates translation by eukaryotic ribosomes. Cell 44: 283–292 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Langridge WH, Fitzgerald KJ, Koncz C, Schell J, Szalay AA: Dual promoter ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens mannopine synthase genes in regulated by plant growth hormones. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 3219–3223 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maliga P, Sz.-Brenznovits A, Marton L: Streptomycin-resistant plants from callus culture of haploid tobacco. Nature New Biol 244: 28–30 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Martin C, Prescott A, Lister C, MacKay S: Activity of the transposon Tam3 inAntirrhinum and tobacco: possible role of DNA methylation. EMBO J 8: 997–1004 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marton L, Wullems GJ, Molendijk L, Schilperoort RA:In vitro transformation of cultured cells fromNicotiana tabacum byAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 277: 129–131 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Matzke MA, Primig M, Trnovsky J, Matzke AJM: Reversible methylation and inactivation of marker genes in sequentially transformed tobacco plants. EMBO J 8: 643–649 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Monk M: Memories of mother and father. Nature 328: 203–205 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Murashigi T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assay with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nagy F, Morelli G, Fraley RT, Rogers SG, Chua N-H: Photoregulated expression of a pearbcS gene in leaves of transgenic plants. EMBO J 12: 3063–3068 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nagy JI, Maliga P: Callus induction and plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts ofNicotiana sylvestris. Z Pflanzenphysiol 78: 453–455 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Napoli C, Lemieux C, Jorgensen R: Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of hormologous genes intrans. Plant Cell 2: 279–289 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Neumann JR, Morency CA, Russian KO: A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression. Biotechniques 5: 444–448 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua N-H: Variability in 35S promoter expression between independent transformants. In: Key J, McIntosh L (eds) Plant Gene Systems and their Biology, pp. 289–299. A.R. Liss, New York (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Peach C, Velten J: Application of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) diffusion assay to transgenic plant tissues. Bio Techniques (submitted) (1991).

  47. Peach C, Velten J: Simultaneous analysis of the expression characteristics of two linked, divergent T-DNA promoters in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol Biol (in preparation) (1991).

  48. Peerbolte R, Leenhouts K, Hooykaas-van Slogteren GMS, Wullems GJ, Schilperoort RA: Clones from a shooty tobacco crown gall tumor II: irregular T-DNA structures and organization, T-DNA methylation and conditional expression of opine genes. Plant Mol Biol 7: 285–299 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Phillips RL, Kaeppler SM, Peschke VM: Do we understand somaclonal variation? In: Nijkamp HJJ, van der Plas KHW, van Aartrijk J (eds) Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture, vol. 9, pp. 131–141. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reik W, Collick A, Norris ML, Barton SC, Surani MA: Genetic imprinting determines methylation of parental alleles in transgenic mice. Nature 328: 248–251 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reitman M, Lee E, Westphal H, Felsenfeld G: Site-independent expression of the chicken 60–1 gene in transgenic mice. Nature 348: 749–752 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rosahl S, Schell J, Willmitzer L: Expression of a tuberspecific storage protein in transgenic tobacco plants: demonstration of an esterase activity. EMBO J 6: 1155–1159 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sanger M, Daubert S, Goodman RM: Characteristics of a strong promoter from figwort mosaic virus: comparison with the analogous 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus and the regulated mannopine synthase promoter. Plant Mol Biol 14: 433–443 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sapienza C, Peterson AC, Rossant J, Balling R: Degree of methyaltion of transgenes is dependent on gamete of origin. Nature 328: 251–254 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Saul MW, Shillito RD, Negrutiu I: Direct DNA transfer to protoplasts with and without electroporation. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA (eds) Plant Molecular Biology Manual, pp. A1/1-A1/16. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schwartz D, dennis E: Transposase activity of the Ac controlling element in maize is regulated by its degree of methylation. Mol Gen Genet 205: 476–482 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Shirsat AH, Wilford N, Croy RRD: Gene copy number and levels of expression in transgenic plants of a seed specific promoter. Plant Sci 61: 75–80 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Southern E: Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98: 503–517 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Spiker S: Chromatin structure and gene regulation in higher plants. Adv Genet 22: 145–207 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Teeri TH, Lehväslaiho H, Franck M, Uotila J, Heino P, Palva ET, Van Montagu M, Herrera-Estrella L: Gene fusions tolacZ reveal new expression patterns of chimeric genes in transgenic plants. EMBO J 8: 343–350 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tuan D, Solomon W, Qiliang L, London IM: The ‘β-globin’ gene domain in human erythroid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 6384–6388 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Uchimiya H, Hirochika H, Hashimoto T, Hara A, Masuda T, Kasumimto T, Harada H, Ikeda J-E, Yoshioka M: Co-expression and inheritance of foreign genes in transformants obtained by direct DNA transformation of tobacco protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 205: 1–8 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  63. van der Krol AR, Mur LA, Beld M, Mol JNM, Stuitje AR: Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. Plant Cell 2: 291–299 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  64. van Slogteren GMS, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA: Silent T-DNA genes in plant lines transformed byAgrobacterium tumefaciens are activated by grafting and by 5-azacytidine treatment. Plant Mol Biol 3: 333–336 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Velten J, Schell J: Selection-expression plasmid vectors for use in genetic transformation of higher plants. Nucl Acids Res 13: 6981–6998 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Velten J, Velten L, Hain R, Schell J: Isolation of a dual plant promoter fragment from the Ti plasmid ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens. EMBO J 3: 2723–2730 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Winter JA, Wright RL, Gurley WB: Map locations of five transcripts homologous to TR-DNA in tobacco and sunflower gall tumors. Nucl Acids Res 9: 4801–4812 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wullems GJ, Krens FA, Schilperoort RA: Transformation of protoplasts via cocultivation with Agrobacterium and via Ti plasmids. In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV (eds) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture, vol 4: Techniques and Applications, pp. 197–220. Macmillan, New York (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zambryski P, Joos H, Genetello C, Leemans J, Van Montagu M, Schell J: Ti plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plants cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J 2: 2143–2150 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Molecular Biology, New Mexico State University, 88003-0001, Las Cruces, NM, USA

    Cindy Peach & Jeff Velten

  2. Plant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, New Mexico State University, 88003-0001, Las Cruces, NM, USA

    Jeff Velten

  3. Chemistry Department, New Mexico State University, 88003-0001, Las Cruces, NM, USA

    Cindy Peach & Jeff Velten

Authors
  1. Cindy Peach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeff Velten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peach, C., Velten, J. Transgene expression variability (position effect) of CAT and GUS reporter genes driven by linked divergent T-DNA promoters. Plant Mol Biol 17, 49–60 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036805

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00036805

Key words

Search

Navigation