Skip to main content
Log in

Diurnal changes in the response of canopy photosynthetic rate to elevated CO2 in a coupled temperature-light environment

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Photosynthesis Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative increase with elevated CO2 of canopy CO2 uptake rate (A), derived from continuous measurements during the day, was examined in full-cover vegetative Lolium perenne canopies after 17 days of regrowth. The stands were grown at ambient (358±50 μmol mol-1) and increased (626±50 μmol mol-1) CO2 concentration in sunlit growth chambers. Over the entire range of temperature and light conditions (which were strongly coupled and increased simultaneously), A was on average twice as large in high compared to ambient CO2. This response (called M=A in high CO2/A in ambient CO2) could not be explained by changes in canopy conductance for CO2 diffusion (GC). In spite of interaction and strong coupling between temperature and light intensity, there was evidence that temperature rather than light determined M. Further, high CO2 treatment was found to alleviate the afternoon depression in A observed in ambient CO2. A temperature optimum shift or/and a larger carbohydrate sink capacity through altered root/shoot ratio are proposed in explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

CO2 uptake rate

C350:

ambient CO2 treatment

C600:

elevated CO2 treatment

E:

canopy evapotranspiration rate

GC:

canopy conductance for CO2 diffusion

M:

high CO2 modification factor

References

  • Acock B and Allen LHJr (1985) Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. In: Strain BR and Cure JR (eds) Direct effects of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation (DOE/ER-0238), pp 53–98. NTIS, Springfield, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen SG, Idso SB, Kimball BA and Anderson MG (1988) Interactive effects of CO2 and environment on photosynthesis of Azolla. Agric For Meteor 42: 209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen SG, Idso SB, Kimball BA, Baker JT, Allen LHJr, Mauney JR, Radin JW and Anderson MG (1990) Effects of air temperature on atmospheric CO2-plant growth relationships (DOE/ER-0450T). NTIS, Springfield, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DN and Enoch HZ (1983) Plant growth and development. In: Lemon ER (ed) CO2 and plants, The response of plants to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, AAS Selected Symposium 84, pp 107–130. Westview, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JT, Allen LHJr, Boote KJ, Jones P and Jones JW (1989) Response of soybean to air temperature and CO2 concentration. Crop Sci 29: 98–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Behaeghe TJ (1979), Seasonal variation in grass growth (College teaching qualification thesis). Ghent, Belgium: Faculty of Agronomy, State University of Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce JA (1990) Afternoon inhibition in maize. 2. Environmental causes and physiological symptoms. Field Crops Res 24: 261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WJ, Allen LH and Bowes G (1990) Response of soybean canopy photosynthesis to CO2 concentration, light and temperature. J Exp Bot 41(225): 427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger DR (1987) Understanding interactions of source and sink regions of plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 25(5): 659–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Kimball BA, Anderson MG and Mauney JR (1987) Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth: the interactive role of air temperature. Agric Ecsys Environ 20: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Kimball BA and Anderson MG (1989) Greenhouse warming could magnify positive effects of CO2 enrichment on plant growth. In: CDIAC Communications, winter 1989, pp 8–9. Carbon Dioxide Information and Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P, Allen LH and Jones JW (1985) Responses of soybean canopy photosynthesis and transpiration to whole-day temperature changes in different CO2 environments. Agron J 77: 242–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball BA (1983) Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior observations. Agron J 75: 779–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Lashof DA and Ahuja DR (1990) Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344: 529–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijs I, Impens I and Behaeghe T (1989a) Leaf and canopy responses of Lolium perenne to long-term elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Planta 177: 312–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijs I, Impens I and Behaeghe T (1989b) Effects of different CO2 environments on the photosynthesis-yield relationship and the carbon and water balance of a white clover (Trifolium repens L. cv. Blanca) sward. J Exp Bot 40(212): 353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy RW and Björkman O (1983) Physiological effects. In: Lemon ER, (ed) CO2 and plants. The response of plants to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, AAS Selected Symposium, pp 65–105. Westview, Boulder, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet MM and Kramer PJ (1980) Effects of decreasing source/sink ratio in soybeans on photosynthesis, photorespiration, transpiration and yield. Plant Cell Environ 3: 201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuveni J and Gale J (1985) The effect of high levels of carbon dioxide on dark respiration and growth of plants. Plant Cell Environ 8: 623–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage RF and Sharkey TD (1987) The effect of temperature on the occurence of O2 and CO2 insensitive photosynthesis in field grown plants. Plant Physiol 84: 658–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF (1987) CANOCO — a fortran programme for community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondence analysis, principal components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1), pp 95. Institute of Applied Computer Science, Wageningen, TNO

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nijs, I., Impens, I. & Van Hecke, P. Diurnal changes in the response of canopy photosynthetic rate to elevated CO2 in a coupled temperature-light environment. Photosynth Res 32, 121–130 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035946

Key words

Navigation