Skip to main content
Log in

Seminal root morphology and coleoptile length in wild (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) and cultivated (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) barley

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Under drought conditions seminal roots may be more important than nodal roots and plants often reach maturity growing with their seminal roots only. This study was conducted to assess the differences, at an early stage of development, for seminal root characteristics and coleoptile length in three groups of barley germplasm: H. spontaneum, landraces, and modern cultivars. H. spontaneum had an average of three seminal root axes, always less than modern varieties and landraces, intermediate maximum seminal root length, and total root length similar to that of modern germplasm. Landraces did not differ from modern cultivars for number of seminal root axes, but they had the longest seminal root system. Modern cultivars had several short seminal roots. The results suggest that landraces have a more vigorous seminal root system than modern cultivars. Both landraces and H. spontaneum are important genetic resources which may contribute to specific adaptation of barley to moisture-stressed environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo, E. & I. Naji, 1987. Variation in coleoptile length of barley, durum wheat and bread wheat genotypes. p. 153–156. In: Cereal Improvement Program. Annual Report for 1986. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belford, R.K., B. Klepper & R.W. Rickman, 1987. Studies of intact shoot-root systems of field-grown winter wheat. II. Root and shoot developmental patterns as related to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron. J. 79: 310–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D.E., 1978. Barley. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, J.S. & H.G. McPherson, 1975. Physiology of water deficits in cereal crops. Adv. Agron. 27: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., 1989. Increasing productivity in unfavourable conditions: philosophies, strategies, methodologies. p. 167–176. In: U. Leone, G. Rialdi & R. Vanore (Eds). Advanced Technologies for Increased Agricultural Production. CNR, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S. & S. Grando, 1987. Diversity for morphological and agronomic characters in Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum C. Koch. Genet. Agr. 41: 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., S. Grando & J.A.G. van Leur, 1987. Genetic diversity in barley landraces from Syria and Jordan. Euphytica 36: 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., E. Acevedo & S. Grando, 1991. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56: 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S. & S. Grando, 1991. Environment of selection and type of germplasm in barley breeding for low-yielding conditions. Euphytica 57: 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Górny, A.G., 1992. Genetic variation of the root system in spring barley and oat. Treatises and Monographs No. 1, Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómy, A.G. & H. Patyna, 1984. The development of the root system in seven spring barley varieties under high and low soil irrigation levels. Z. Acker-und Pflanzenbau 153: 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grando, S., 1986. Studio della variabilità in popolazioni mediterranee, coltivate e spontanee, di Hordeum vulgare e Hordeum spontaneum. PhD Thesis. University of Perugia, Italy (in Italian).

  • Grando, S. & S. Ceccarelli, 1991. Use of H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum in barley breeding for stress conditions. p. 526–529. In: L. Munck (Ed). Barley Genetics VI, Volume I. Proceedings of the Sixth International Barley Genetics Symposium, July 22–27, 1991, Helsingborg, Sweden.

  • Gregory, P.J., 1987. Development and growth of root systems in plant communities. p. 147–166. In: P.J. Gregory, J.V. Lake & D.A. Rose (Eds). Root Development and Function. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hurd, E.A., 1976. Plant breeding for drought resistance. p. 317–353. In: T.T. Kozlowski (Ed). Water Deficits and Plant Growth. Vol. 4. Academic Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaradat, A. & M. Duwayri, 1981. effect of different moisture deficits on durum wheat seed germination and seedling growth. Cereal Res. Comm. 9(1): 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, S., 1982a. Vinterhärdighet hos höstevetesorter i Sverige genom aren. Sveriges Utsä desförenings Tidskrift 92: 109–132 (in Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, S., 1982b. A simple, rapid and nondestructive screening method useful for drought resistance breeding in oat. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg 89: 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, S. & A.G. Gómy, 1988. Grain yield and drought resistance indices of oat cultivars in field rain shelter and laboratory experiments. J. Agron. and Crop Sci. 161: 277–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, M.M. & R.C. Muchow, 1988. Critical evaluation of the possibilities for modifying crops for high production per unit of precipitation. p. 179–211. In: F.R. Bidinger & C. Johansen (Eds). Drought Research Priorities for the Dryland Tropics. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, R.R. & C.F. Konzak, 1967. A new technique for culturing and measuring barley seedlings. Crop Sci. 7: 275–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P.R. & L.E. Moser, 1988. Seedling root development and morphology of cool-season and warm-season forage grasses. Crop Sci. 28: 148–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, L.R., 1979. Breeding for drought resistance: what plant characteristics impart resistance? HortScience 14(5): 590–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura, J.B., 1972. The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23: 745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura, J.B., 1977. Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. J. Aust. Inst. Agri. Sci. 42: 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.A. & J.B. Passioura, 1981a. Seminal root morphology and water use of wheat. I. Environmental effects. Crop Sci. 21: 249–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.A. & J.B. Passioura, 1981b. Seminal root morphology and water use of wheat. II. Genetic variation. Crop Sci. 21: 253–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B.M., J.G. Waines & B.S. Gill, 1979. Genetic variability for seedling root numbers in wild and domesticated wheat. Crop Sci. 19: 843–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troughton, A., 1962. The roots of temperate cereals (wheat, barley, oats and rye). Mimeo Publ. 2, Commonwealth Bureau of Pasture and Field Crops, Hurley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grando, S., Ceccarelli, S. Seminal root morphology and coleoptile length in wild (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) and cultivated (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) barley. Euphytica 86, 73–80 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035941

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00035941

Key words

Navigation