Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Maximum-likelihood ordination — some improvements and further tests

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A modification to a previously described maximum likelihood approach to non-linear ordination is presented. It involves weighting quantitative measures of species importance to ensure that changes in values along a gradient are given equal weight irrespective of their magnitude. The maximum likelihood method was tested with artificial data based on a model incorporating various types of non-linear species responses. Symmetrical and asymmetrical response surfaces, with and without central depression, were used and the method was shown to be reasonably robust. In tests on both real and artificial data it proved superior to other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin M. P. 1976. Performance of four ordination techniques assuming three different non-linear response models. Vegetatio 33: 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P. 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio 42: 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin M. P. & Austin B. O. 1980. Behaviour of experimental plant communities along a nutrient gradient. J. Ecol. 68: 891–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals E. W. 1960. Forest bird communities in the Apostle Islands of Wisconsin. Wilson Bull. 72: 156–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray J. R. & Curtis J. T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr E. J. 1968. Cluster sorting with mixed character types. I. Standardization of character values. Aust. Comput. J. 1: 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall D. W. & Johnson R. W. 1982. Non-linear ordination in several dimensions. A maximum likelihood approach. Vegetatio 48: 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower J. C. 1971. Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In: Hobson F. R., Kendall D. G. & Tautu P. (eds), Mathematics in the archaelogical and historical sciences, pp. 138–149. Edinburgh University Press. Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill M. O. 1973. Reciprocal averaging: An eigenvector method of ordination. J. Ecol. 61: 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R. W. & Goodall D. W. 1979. A maximum likelihood approach to non-linear ordination. Vegetatio 41: 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir I. & Austin M. P. 1970. Principal component ordination and simulated vegetation data. Ecology 51: 551–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan J. M. A. 1970. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetation data. Ecology 51: 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Wildlife & Rangelands Research, CSIRO, Helena Valley, 6056, WA, Australia

    D. W. Goodall

  2. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland Herbarium, Meiers Road, 4068, Indooroopilly, Qld, Australia

    R. W. Johnson

Authors
  1. D. W. Goodall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. W. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodall, D.W., Johnson, R.W. Maximum-likelihood ordination — some improvements and further tests. Vegetatio 73, 3–12 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031846

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031846

Keywords

Search

Navigation