Abstract
Ecological field theory (EFT) quantifies plant spatial influences as pulsating geometric zones about individual plants. It provides the basis for a methodology to include spatial interactions between plants of different size, function and growth-form in models of plant community dynamics. The key components of EFT are: 1. the influence domain of individuals (D), 2. the field intensity within the domains (I), 3. the influence surface (ID) and 4. the intensity of interactions (II). The means to calculate these key components are outlined and several tests of the methodology as applied to a semi-arid eucalypt woodland are presented. The tests include a comparison of measured shrub growth with a computer implementation of EFT (the RESCOMP model) and spatial growth data from the eucalypt woodland to support the postulates included in EFT. Practical uses expected for the method are in agroforestry, landscape rehabilitation, simulations of disturbance effects and in determining invasibility of plant communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ARGR =:
-
Actual Relative Growth Rate
- EFT =:
-
Ecological Field Theory
- IRM =:
-
Integrated Rate Method
- PRGR =:
-
Potential Relative Growth Rate
- RESCOMP=:
-
RESource COMPetition model
- SMRGR =:
-
Spatially Modified Relative Growth Rate
References
BeestonG. R., WalkerP. J., PurdieR. & PickardJ. 1980. Plant communities of the poplar box (Eucalyptus populnea) lands of Eastern Australia. Aust. Rangel. J. 2: 1–16.
BeggJ. E. & CunninghamR. B., 1974. Penetration of radiation into a eucalypt woodland. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 40: 160–164.
BraunackM. V. & WalkerJ. 1985. Recovery of some surface soil properties following sheep grazing regimes on a semi-arid woodland. Aust. J. Ecol. 10: 451–460.
BurchG. & NichollsA. O. 1981. Effects of vegetation communities on the simulated soil water balance in Eucalyptus populnea lands. Aust. Rangel. J. 3: 24–32.
CharleyJ. L. & WestN. E. 1975. Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J. Ecol. 63: 945–964.
CrawleyM. J. 1986. Plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
FordE. D. 1975. Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures. J. Ecol. 63: 311–33.
FordE. D. & DiggleP. J. 1981. Competition for light in a plant monoculture modelled as a spatial stochastic process. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 48 (4): 481–500.
GatesD. J. 1982. Competition and skewness in plantations. J. theor. Biol. 94: 909–922.
GatesD. J. & WestcottM. 1981. Negative skewness and negative correlations in spatial competition models. J. Math. Biol. 13: 159–171.
GrimeJ. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley & Sons, chichester.
HarperJ. L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London.
JuppD. L. B., WalkerJ. & PenridgeL. K. 1986. Interpretation of vegetation structure in Landsat MSS imagery: a case study in disturbed semi-arid eucalypt woodlands. Part 2. Model-based analysis. J. Environ. Managem. 23: 35–57.
KuuluvainenT. & PukkalaT. 1987. Effect of crown shape and tree distribution on the spatial distribution of shade. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 40: 215–231.
NixH. A. 1982. Environmental determinats of biogeography, and evolution in Terra Australis. In: BarkerW. R. & GreensladeP. J. M. (eds), Evolution of the flora and fauna of arid Australia, pp. 47–66. Peacock Publications, Adelaide.
NobleI. R. & SlatyerR. O. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43: 5–21.
OlsenR. L., SharpeP. J. H. & WuH. 1985. Whole plant modelling: A continuous-time Markov (CTM) approach. Ecol. Modell. 29: 171–188.
PenridgeL. K. & WalkerJ. 1986. The effect of neighbouring trees on eucalypt growth in a semi-arid woodland in Australia, J. Ecol. 74: 925–936.
Penridge, L. K., Walker, J., Sharpe, P. J. H., Spence, R. D., Wu, H. & Zou, G. 1987. RESCOMP: A resource competition model to simulate the dynamics of vegetation cover. CSIRO Div. of Water and Land Resources Technical Memorandum 87/5, Canberra.
PielouL. 1977. Mathematical ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
ReeceP. H. & CampbellB. L. 1986. The use of 137Cs for determining soil erosion differences in a disturbed and non-disturbed semi-arid ecosystem. In: Rangelands: A resource under siege. Proc. of the Second International Rangeland Congress. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 1986.
SharpeP. J. H., WalkerJ., PenridgeL. K. & WuH. 1985. A physiologically-based continuous-time Markov approach to plant growth modelling in semi-arid woodlands. Ecol. Modell. 29: 189–214.
SharpeP. J. H., WalkerJ., PenridgeL. K., WuH. & RykielE. J. 1986. Spatial considerations in physiological models of tree growth. Tree Physiol. 2: 403–421.
ShugartH. H. 1984. A theory of forest dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
SmithT. M. & GoodmanP. S. 1986. The effect of competition on the structure and dynamics of Acacia savannas in southern Africa. J. Ecol. 74: 1031–1044.
TilmanD. 1988. Dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton.
TunstallB. R. & WalkerJ. 1975. The effect of woodland disturbance on soil water, Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 9: 49–58.
vanTongerenO. & PrenticeI. C. 1986. A spatial simulation model for vegetation dynamics. Vegetatio 65: 163–173.
WalkerJ., MooreR. M. & RobertsonJ. A. 1972. Herbage response to tree, and shrub thinning in E. populnea woodlands. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23: 405–410.
WalkerJ., thompsonC. H., FergusI. F. & TunstallB. R. 1981. Plant succession and soil development in coastal sand dunes of sub-tropical eastern Australia. In: WestD., ShugartH. H. & BotkinD. (eds), Forest succession — concepts and applications, pp. 107–126. Springer-Verlag, New York.
WalkerJ., robertsonJ. A., PenridgeL. K. & SharpeP. J. H. 1986. Herbage response to tree thinning in a Eucalyptus crebra woodland. Aust. J. Ecol. 11: 135–140.
WeinerJ. 1984. Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals. J. Ecol. 72: 183–195.
WoodwardF. I. 1987. Climate and plant distribution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
WuH., SharpeP. J. H., WalkerJ. & PenridgeL. K. 1985. Ecological field theory (EFT): A spatial analysis of resource interference among plants. Ecol. Modell. 29: 215–243.
ZinkeP. J., 1962. The pattern of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology 43: 130–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walker, J., Sharpe, P.J.H., Penridge, L.K. et al. Ecological Field Theory: the concept and field tests. Vegetatio 83, 81–95 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031682
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00031682