Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of macroinvertebrates and macrophytes on waterfowl utilization of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of northwestern Wisconsin

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Waterfowl and limnological data were monitored on Waterfowl Production Area (WPA) wetlands in northwestern Wisconsin over a 6-yr period (1983–88) to determine the impact of macroinvertebrates and macrophytes on waterfowl utilization. Interrelationships between limnological conditions and Waterfowl Breeding Pair Densities (BPDs reported as pairs/ha water surface) were analyzed using correlation and general linear model analysis techniques.

Annual changes in waterfowl BPDs differed between wetlands according to differences in the structure of macrophyte communities and basin morphometry. The strength of associations differed between the two dominant waterfowl species. In a wetland dominated by dense stands of submersed vegetation, annual fluctuations in blue-winged teal (Anas discors) BPDs corresponded directly with changes in macrophyte biomass, but not with changes in macroinvertebrate density. In a nearby less densely vegetated wetland of similar water chemistry and trophic status, fluctuations in teal BPDs corresponded directly with changes in macroinvertebrate density, but not with changes in macrophyte biomass. These associations occurred despite a significant positive correlation between macroinvertebrates and macrophyte biomass in the latter habitat. Annual fluctuations in mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) BPDs were not correlated significantly with either macrophyte biomass or macroinvertebrate density in either wetland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. P. & T. D. Nudds, 1985. Factors influencing invertebrate size distributions in prairie potholes and implications for coexisting duck species. Freshwat. Invert. Biol. 4: 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarre, G. A. & L. E. Nauman, 1981. Factors affecting waterfowl use and production on man-made flowages in central Wisconsin. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 69: 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartonek, J. C. & J. J. Hickey, 1969. Selective feeding by juvenile diving ducks in summer. Auk 86: 443–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, L. A. & T. D. Nudds, 1989. Differential habitat occupancy by goldeneye ducklings (Bucephala clangula) and fish: predator avoidance or competition? Can. J. Zool. 67: 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellrose, F. C., 1976. Ducks, geese and swans of North America. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C., 540 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethke, R. W., 1991. Seasonality and interspecific competition in waterfowl — a comment. Ecology 72: 1155–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. S., J. L. Savard & G. E. J. Smith, 1989. Relationships between aquatic birds and wetland characteristics in the Aspen Parkland, central British Columbia. Technical Report Series No. 70. Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon Region, British Columbia, 61 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. L. & M. J. Psujek, 1977. A comparison of wetland bird aggregations and macrobenthos in temporary spring ponds. Trans. III. State Acad. Sci. 70: 332–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canfield, D. E. Jr, K. A. Langeland, M. J. Maceina, W. T. Haller, J. V. Shireman & J. R. Jones, 1983. Trophic state classification with aquatic macrophytes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 40: 1713–1718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chura, N. J., 1961. Food availability and preferences of juvenile mallards. Trans. N Am. Wildl. Conf. 26: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, L. B. & W.E. Cooper, 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802–1813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R., 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci. 33: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBowy, P. J., 1988. Waterfowl communities and seasonal environments: temporal variability in interspecific competition. Ecology 69: 1439–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBowy, P. J., 1991. Seasonality and interspecific competition in waterfowl guilds: patterns and processes — a reply to Bethke. Ecology 72: 1159–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzubin, A., 1955. Some evidences of home range in waterfowl. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 20: 278–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzubin, A., 1969. Assessing breeding populations of ducks by ground counts. In Saskatoon Wetlands Seminar, Canadian Wildl. Serv. Rep. Ser. No. 6, 262 pp.

  • Eadie, J. M. & A. Keast, 1982. Do goldeneye and perch compete for food? Oecologia (Berl) 55: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M. O. G., 1983. The role of fish in the selection of lakes by nonpiscivorous ducks: mallards, teal and goldeneye. Wildfowl 34: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. D., 1951. A study of the movements of waterfowl broods in Manitoba. Univ. Minn. MS Thesis, 133 pp.

  • Evrard, J. O., 1975. Waterfowl use of dug ponds in northwestern Wisconsin. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 3: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evrard, J. O. & R. A. Lillie, 1987. Duck and pheasant management in the pothole region of Wisconsin. Interim Rep. Study 316. Pittman-Robertson Project W-141-R. Wis. Dep. Nat. Resour., Madison, 115 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, P. R. & D. E. Joyner, 1981. Pond ecology and its influence on mallard use in Ontario, Canada. Wildfowl 32: 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D., R. Wright & M. Street, 1987. Survival of mallard ducklings Anas platyrhynchos and competition with fish for invertebrates on a flooded gravel quarry in England. Wildfowl 129: 159–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobaugh, W. C. & J. G. Teer, 1981. Waterfowl use characteristics of flood-prevention lakes in northcentral Texas. J. Wildl. Mgmt 45: 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. L. Jr, J. J. Jones, K. E. Gibbs & J. R. Moring, 1986. Duckling responses to lake acidification: do black ducks and fish compete? Oikos 47: 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, R. & R. Lound, 1962. An evaluation of a survey technique for submerged aquatic plants. Minn. Dep. Conserv. Game Invest. Rep. No. 6, 10 pp.

  • Kaminski, R. M. & H. H. Prince, 1981. Dabbling duck and aquatic macroinvertebrate responses to manipulated wetland habitat. J. Wildl. Mgmt 45: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H. A., 1986. Effects of vegetation manipulation on breeding waterfowl in prairie wetlands: a literature review. U. S. Dep. Inter., Fish and Wildl. Serv. Tech. Rep. No. 3, 15 pp.

  • Keith, L. B., 1961. A study of waterfowl ecology on small impoundments in southeastern Alberta. Wildl. Monogr. 6: 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapu, G. L., 1974. Feeding ecology of pintail hens during reproduction. Auk 91: 278–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokemoen, J. T., 1972. Duck use related to pond size and spacing. In H. W. Miller (ed.), Wildlife on man-made areas, Northern Prairie Wildl. Res. Center, Jamestown, N.D., 89 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, F., 1965. Spacing and chasing in breeding ducks. Wildfowl Trust Ann. Rep. 16: 92–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhern, J. H., T. D. Nudds & B. R. Neal, 1985. Wetland selection by mallards and blue-winged teal. Wilson Bull., 97: 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murkin, H. R. & J. A. Kadlec, 1986. Relationships between waterfowl and macroinvertebrate densities in a northern prairie marsh. J. Wildl. Mgmt 50: 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murkin, H. R., R. M. Kaminski & R. D. Titman, 1982. Responses by dabbling ducks and aquatic invertebrates to an experimentally manipulated cattail marsh. Can. J. Zool. 60: 2324–2342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. W. & J. A. Kadlec, 1984. A conceptual approach to relating habitat structure and macroinvertebrate production in freshwater wetlands. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 49: 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L., 1972. Local distribution, food choice and food consumption of diving ducks on a south Swedish lake. Oikos 23: 82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novitzki, R. P., 1979. An introduction to Wisconsin wetlands. Plants, hydrology, and soils. Univ. Wis.-Extension, Geolog. Nat. Hist. Survey, Madison, WI., 19 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. H., 1976. The role of environmental heterogeneity in the regulation of duck populations. J. Wildl. Mgmt 40: 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson, O., 1979. Feeding behavior, feeding habitat utilization, and feeding efficiency of mallard ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos L.) as guided by a domestic duck. Viltrevy. Swedish Wildl. 10: 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pehrsson, O., 1984. Relationships of food to spatial and temporal breeding strategies of mallards in Sweden. J. Wildl. Mgmt 48: 322–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret, N. G., 1962. The spring and summer foods of the common mallard (Anas platyrhynchos L.) in south central Manitoba. Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver. MS Thesis, 82 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, L. R., M. A. Martin, J. M. Cole, J. R. March & C. M. Pils, 1982. Evaluation of waterfowl production areas in Wisconsin. Wis. Dep. Nat. Resour. Tech. Bull. No. 135, 32 pp.

  • Reinecke, K. J., 1977. The importance of freshwater invertebrates and female energy reserves for black ducks breeding in Maine. Univ. Maine, Orono. PhD Thesis, 113 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel, R. J., 1961. Water depth and turbidity in relation to growth of sago pondweed. J. Wildl. Mgmt 25: 436–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.A.S. Institute, Inc., 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 edition, SAS Institute Inc., Box 8000, Cary, North Carolina, 956 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L. D., 1973. A literature review on the role of invertebrates in waterfowl management. Colo. Div. Wildl. Spec. Rep. No. 29, 13 pp.

  • Sowls, L. R., 1955. Prairie ducks. Stackpole, Harrisburg, Penn., 193 pp.

  • Stewart, R. E. & H. A. Kantrud, 1971. Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Resources Publication No. 92. Washington, DC., 57 pp.

  • Sugden, L. G., 1973. Feeding ecology of pintail, gadwall, American wigeon and lesser scaup ducklings in southern Alberta. Can. Wild. Serv. Rep. Ser. No. 24, Ottawa, 43 pp.

  • Swanson, G. A., 1984–85. Invertebrates consumed by dabbling ducks (Anatinae) on the breeding grounds. J. Minn. Acad. Sci. 50: 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. & M. I. Meyer, 1977. Impact of fluctuating water levels on feeding ecology of breeding blue-winged teal. J. Wildl. Mgmt 41: 426–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G. A. & H. K. Nelson, 1970. Potential influence of fish rearing programs on waterfowl breeding habitat. In E. Schneberger (ed.) Special symposium on midwestern winterkill lakes, North Central Div. Am. Fish. Soc., 75 pp.

  • Talent, L. G., G. L. Krapu & R. L. Jarvis, 1982. Habitat use by mallard broods in south central North Dakota. J. Wildl. Mgmt 46: 629–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Valk, A. G. & C. B. Davis, 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, R. & J. Kerekes, 1982. OECD eutrophication of waters, monitoring, assessment and control. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris, 154 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. W. & L. H. Fredrickson, 1974. Avian ecology of a managed glacial marsh. Living Bird 12: 269–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. E. & J. R. March, 1979. Characteristics of scattered wetlands in relation to duck production in southeastern Wisconsin. Wis. Dep. Nat. Resour. Tech. Bull. No. 116, 61 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lillie, R.A., Evrard, J.O. Influence of macroinvertebrates and macrophytes on waterfowl utilization of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole Region of northwestern Wisconsin. Hydrobiologia 279, 235–246 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027857

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027857

Key words

Navigation