Skip to main content
Log in

Response of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) to some different fertilizers applied at planting

  • General Paper
  • Published:
New Forests Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four fertilization at planting experiments were conducted with Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) on eastern Vancouver Island. In experiment 1 Agriform (20-10-5, AGR) and Osmocote (17-7-12, OSM) supplied N at 0, 4.2, 8.4, 16.8 or 33.6 g/tree either broadcast, within 15 cm of the tree, or in a hole 15 cm from the tree (adjacent). In experiment 2 AGR, diammonium phosphate (21-55-0, DAP), ammonium sulphate (21-0-0, AMS), sulphur coated urea (35-0-0, SCU) supplied N at 0, 8.4, 16.8 and 25.2 g/tree. Triple superphosphate (0-45-0, TSP) supplied P at the same levels as DAP: 0, 9.6, 19.2 and 28.8 g/tree. In experiment 3 AGR and SCU (32-0-0) supplied N at 0, 8.4 and 16.8 g/tree. In experiment 4 DAP was used to fertilize trees on five different dates, between March and October, and each treatment supplied 16 g N/tree. Two-year old, bare root, planting stock was used except in experiment 3, where container stock was compared with bare root stock.

Little growth response was obtained after one year, but height growth responses of 12 to 31% were measured after 3 to 6 years with fertilizers supply 8.4 to 16.8 g N per tree. Growth responses were little affected by the type of fertilizer and were primarily due to N, with release rate having no marked effect. The exception to this was TSP which did not increase growth but did increase survival. Survival was reduced by AMS and to a lesser extent by AGR. Container seedlings responded more to fertilization at planting than bare root seedlings.

Seedling N, P and K concentrations and contents declined following planting for 6 months and only started to recover after July. Application of fertilizer caused a small increase in seedling nutrient concentration regardless of date, but this had no detectable effect on dry weight measured six weeks later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, H. L. 1987. Forest fertilizers. Nutrient amendment, stand productivity, and environmental impact. J. For. 85: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armson, K. A. and Sadreika, V. 1979. Forest tree nursery soil management and related practices, p. 50. Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, H. J., Giles, G. R., McLean, A. J. and Wright, J. R. 1958. Chemical methods of soil analysis. Contribution 169 (revised), Chemistry Division—Science Service. Canada Dept. Agric., Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. C., and Strand, R. F. 1960. The use of slowly soluble fertilizers in forest planting in the Pacific Northwest. J. For. 58: 619–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, R. 1978. Use of fertilizers at establishment of exotic forest plantations in New Zealand. N.Z.J. For. Sci. 8: 70–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockley, R. P. 1987. The effects of fertilization on the early growth of planted seedlings: a problem analysis. FRDA project 3.30. B.C. Min. Forests and Lands, Victoria, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdett, A. N., Herring, L. J. and Thompson, C. F. 1984. Early growth of planted spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 644–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, W. C. 1981. Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on shoot and root development of outplanted western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla Raf. Sarg.) seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 752–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, W. C. and Preisig, C. L. 1981. Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on the shoot and root development of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 230–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellier, K. M. and Stephens, C. G. 1980. Effect of fertilizer and weed control on the early growth of Pinus radiata D. Don in Southern Australia. Aust. For. Res. 10: 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, W. J. B. 1982. Fertilizer treatment of Pinus radiata at establishment and at thinning—an evaluation of its potential in Australia. N.Z.J. For. Sci. 12: 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everard, J. E. 1974. Fertilizers in the establishment of conifers in Wales and southern England. Forestry Comm. London H.M.S.O. Booklet 41: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Constable and Co. Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinka, K., Green, R. N., Courtin, P. J. and Nuszdorfer, F. C. 1984. Site diagnosis, tree species selection, and slashburning, guidelines for the Vancouver forest region. Land Management Rep.25:1–180 Min. Forests, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar, E. K. S. and Cellier, K. M. 1985. Nitrogen fertilizers in establishing Pinus radiata plantations on sandy soils: and evaluation of their use. Aust. For. 48, 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, W. A., Davis, G. R., McDavitt, J. G. and Pataczek, W. 1984. Growth and nutrient uptake of Pinus radiata seedlings over the first 3 years following treatment with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers. Aust. For. Res. 14: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuszdorfer, K. L. 1987. Fertilization of western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) seedlings at time of planting on sites prone to Salal (Gaultheria shallon Pursh.) domination. Assoc. B.C. Prof. Foresters Rep. (in manuscript).

  • Rothacher, J. S. and Franklin, J. F. 1964. Fertilizer pellets improve growth of planted Douglas-fir on an unfavourable site. Tree Planter's Notes 67: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. B. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamm, C. O. 1964. Determination of nutrient requirements of forest stands. Int. Rev. For. Res. 1: 115–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, T. A. 1981. Summary of results and economic analysis of time-of-planting fertilization. Interim report No. 5 Crown Zellerbach Corporation, Forestry Research Division.

  • van den, Driessche, R. 1983. Growth, survival, and physiology of Douglas-fir seedlings following root wrenching and fertilization. Can. J. For. Res. 13: 270–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den, Driessche, R. 1984. Soil fertility in forest nurseries, pp. 63–74. In: Duryea, M. L. and Landis, T. D. (Eds) Martinus Nijhoff, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague/Boston/Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, H. D. and Snowdon, P. 1986. Early growth responses by Pinus radiata to three mixed fertilizers. Aust. For. Res. 16: 91–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Den Driessche, R. Response of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) to some different fertilizers applied at planting. New Forest 2, 89–110 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027761

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00027761

Key words

Navigation