Skip to main content
Log in

Aquatic Oligochaetes in ditches

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Macrofaunal and environmental data were collected from 97 sampling sites in ditches. In total 28 oligochaete taxa were found, 22 of which were determined to species level and further processed. About 33 environmental variables were measured at each site.

The resulting multivariate data set is described by three techniques, clustering (FLEXCLUS), ordination (CANOCO) and log linear regression (exponential and Gaussian).

In this way a detailed description of environmental preferences of the dominant species collected is given and also the possible species combinations which can be found under certain environmental circumstances.

Some advantages and disadvantages of the multivariate analysis techniques are reported. Detrended canonical correspondence analysis is a promising technique, especially in combination with clustering and regression analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvey et al., 1977. GENSTAT: a general statistical program Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O., 1964. Observations on the biology of lake dwelling Tubificidae (Oligochaeta). Arch. Hydrobiol. 60: 385–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhurst, R. O. & C. R. Kennedy, 1965. Studies on the biology of the Tubificidae (Annelida, Oligochaeta) in a polluted stream. J. Animal Ecol. 34: 429–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bülow, T., 1957. Systematisch-autokologischen Studien an eulitoralen Oligochaeten des Kimbrischen Halbinsel. Kieler Meeresforsch. 13(1): 69–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chekanovskaya, O. V., 1962. [The aquatic oligochaete fauna of the U.S.S.R.] Opred. Faune SSSR 78: 1–411 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumnicka, E., 1978. Communities of oligochaetes (Oligochaeta) of the River Nida and its tributaries. Acta Hydrobiol. 20(2): 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumnicka, E. & K. Pasternak, 1978. The influence of physicochemical properties of water and bottom sediments in the River Nida on the distribution and number of Oligochaeta. Acta Hydrobiol. 20(2): 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzwillo, M., 1966. Untersuchungen uber die Zusammensetzung der Tubificidenfauna im Hamburger Hafen. Abh. Verh. naturw. Ver. Hamburg (NF) 11: 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Jr., 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, 298 pp.

  • Higler, L. W. G., 1977. Marofauna-cenoses on Stratiotes plants in Dutch broads. Verh. 11, RIN, Leersum, The Netherlands, 86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979a. DECORANA — A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979b. TWINSPAN — A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltunen, J. K., 1967. Some oligochaetes from Lake Michigan. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 86: 433–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonasson, P. M. & F. Thorhauge, 1976. Population dynamics of Potamothrix hammoniensis in the profundal of Lake Esrom with special reference to environmental and competitive factors. Oikos 23: 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh, C. L., J. A. Nelder, 1983. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W., 1979. Influence of food availability and other factors on the composition, structure and density on a subarctic population of benthic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 62: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuche, O., 1977. Oekologische and systematische Untersuchungen an naidomorphen Oligochaeten brackiger und limnischer Biotope. Diss. Univ. Hamburg, 138 pp.

  • Preston, F. W., 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity: part 1. Ecology 43: 185–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särkkä, J., 1969. The bottom fauna at the mouth of the river Kokemaenjoki, southwestern Finland. Ann. zool. fenn. 6: 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1985. CANOCO — A FORTRAN program for canonical correspondence analysis and detrended correspondence analysis. IWISTNO, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, in press.

  • Ter Braak, C. J. F. & C. W. N. Looman, 1986. Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tongeren, O. van, 1982. FLEXCLUS, and interactive flexible cluster program (in prep.).

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1983. Ecological characterization of surface waters in the province of Overijssel (The Netherlands). H20 16(25): 574–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot, P. F. M., 1984. The distribution of aquatic oligochaetes on the fenland area of NW. Overijssel (The Netherlands). Hydrobiologia 115: 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachs, B., 1967. Die Oligochaeten Fauna der Fliessgewässer unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der Beziehungen zwischen der Tubificiden Besiedlung und dem Substrat. Arch. Hydrobiol. 63: 310.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verdonschot, P.F.M. Aquatic Oligochaetes in ditches. Hydrobiologia 155, 283–292 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025661

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025661

Key words

Navigation