Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic relationships between attributes in sugarcane clones closely related to Saccharum spontaneum

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Saccharum spontaneum is being used in sugarcane breeding programs in attempt to improve characteristics such as ratooning ability and stress tolerance. A population of F1 (Saccharum officinarum or commercial variety x S. spontaneum) and F1 x F1 sugarcane clones was evaluated for sugar yield and a range of yield components in a plant and two ratoon crops. The aim was to determine genetic correlations between attributes in clones with a large component of S. spontaneum, that could be used to help derive appropriate selection indices in such populations.

There were close associations between the same attributes measured in different crop-years and the associations between different attributes were generally similar across crop-years. Stalk number and fibre content were positively correlated, as were stalk weight and CCS. The latter two attributes (which are low in S. spontaneum but high in S. officinarum) were negatively correlated with the former two (high in S. spontaneum, low in S. officinarum). Sugar yield was more closely associated with stalk weight and CCS than with stalk number but became more closely associated with stalk number with successive ratoon crops.

CCS was positively correlated (rg=0.55) with cane yield in the plant crop but showed a small negative correlation with cane yield (rg=−0.20) in the second ratoon crop. CCS (measured in any crop) also had a negative correlation with cane yield in the ratoon crops expressed as a percentage of plant cane yield. This suggests that CCS is negatively correlated with levels of traits contributing to ratooning ability. Intensive selection among such populations for CCS without consideration of ratooning performance may reduce the frequency of favourable specific ratooning characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CCS:

commercial cane sugar

References

  • Anderson R.L. & T.A.Bancroft, 1952. Statistical theory in Research. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berding, N. & B.T. Roach, 1987. Germplasm maintenance and use. p. 143–210. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed). Developments in Crop Science II. Sugarcane improvement through breeding. (Elsevier).

  • Falconer D.S., 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd ed. Longman Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravios K.A. & S.B.Milligan, 1992. Genetic relationships between fiber and sugarcane yield components. Crop Sci. 32: 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson P.A., 1992. Genotype x environment interactions in sugarcane II. Use of performance in plant cane as indirect selection criterion for performance in ratoon crops. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 43: 1461–1470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson P.A. & B.T.Roach, 1994. Performance of sugarcane progeny from crosses between clones derived from diverse S. spontaneum sources. Trop. Agric. 71: 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan S.B., K.A.Gravios, K.P.Bischoff & F.A.Martin, 1990. Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits. Crop Sci. 30: 927–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirzawan, P.D.N., M. Cooper & D.M. Hogarth, 1993. The magnitude of genotype by environment interactions for cane yield, sugar yield and CCS in Southern Queensland and their impact on selection. In: Focused Plant Improvement: Towards responsible and sustainable agriculture. Proc. Tenth Aust. Plant Breed. Conf.

  • Price S., 1963. Cytogenetics of modern sugar canes. Economic Botany 17: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach B.T., 1986. Evaluation and use of sugarcane germplasm. Proceedings of 19th Congress of International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 1: 492–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach B.T., 1989. Origin and improvement of the genetic base of sugarcane. Proceedings of Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 11: 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach B.T. & J.Daniels, 1987. A review of the origin and improvement of sugarcane. Copersucar International Sugarcane Breeding Workshop 1: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G.A. & N.I.James, 1969. Association of characters within and repeatability between years in progenies of four sugarcane crosses. Crop Sci. 9: 819–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, T.V., B.S. Ahloowalia & D.J. Heinz, 1987. Cytogenetics. p. 211–253. In: D.J. Heinz (Ed). Developments in Crop Science II. Sugarcane improvement through breeding. (Elsevier).

  • Tallis G.M., 1959. Sampling error of genetic correlation coefficients calculated from analyses of variance and covariance. Aust. J. Statist. 1: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanimoto T., 1964. The press method of cane analysis. Hawaii Plant. Rec. 57(2): 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, P. Genetic relationships between attributes in sugarcane clones closely related to Saccharum spontaneum . Euphytica 79, 101–108 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023581

Key words

Navigation