Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in sweet corn kernel characteristics associated with stand establishment and eating quality

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A better understanding of the relationships between kernel characteristics associated with eating quality and stand establishment could be helpful in selection of superior genotypes by the sweet corn industry. A set of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) inbred lines with different endosperm mutations (su1, su1 se1 and sh2) were evaluated for field emergence and seedling growth rate at two locations over two years. Kernel characteristics associated with eating quality (kernel moisture concentration, kernel tenderness, sugars, phytoglycogen and dimethyl sulfide (DMS) concentrations were determined for the same inbreds by laboratory analysis from ears harvested at 18 and 22 days after pollination (DAP). Amounts of sugars, phytoglycogen and starch were also measured in mature dry kernel samples of the same inbreds. Extensive genetic variability was found among endosperm mutations and among genetic backgrounds within the different endosperm groups for most of the characteristics under study. Most of the kernel attributes associated with eating quality were uncorrelated indicating that selection to improve specific eating quality characteristics can be conducted simultaneously. A negative correlation between field emergence and sugar concentrations in immature kernels suggests that in breeding programs designed to develop germplasm with improved germination and stand establishment, concurrent attention must be given to the fresh quality of the harvested product. This information is of value to breeders and commercial growers for selection of sh2 and su1 se1 lines with superior field emergence and eating quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

(DAP):

days after pollination

(DMS):

dimethyl sulfide

References

  • Andrew R.H., 1982. Factors influencing early seedling vigor of shrunken-2 maize. Crop Sci. 22: 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azanza F., J.A.Juvik & B.P.Klein, 1994. Relationships between sensory quality attributes and kernel chemical composition of fresh-frozen sweet corn. J. Food Quality 17: 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey D.M. & R.M.Bailey, 1938. The relation of the pericarp to tenderness in sweet corn. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 36: 555–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowski A.M., V.A.Fritz & L.Waters, 1991. Seed maturity influences germination and vigor of two shrunken2 sweet corn hybrids. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 401–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breeden D.C. & J.A.Juvik, 1992. An extraction method for the determination of dimethyl sulfide in cooked corn. Food Comp. and Analysis 5: 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey E.E., A.M.Rhodes & D.B.Dickinson, 1982. Post-harvest levels of sugars and sorbitol in sugary enhancer (su1 se1) and sugary (su1 Se1) maize. HortScience 17: 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey E.E., D.B.Dickinson & A.M.Rhodes, 1984. Sugar characteristics of sweet corn populations from a sugary enhancer breeding program. Euphytica 33: 609–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill G.A. & R.H.Andrew, 1984. Effects of two maize endosperm mutants on kernel maturity, carbohydrates and germination. Crop Sci. 24: 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe E.H. & M.Polacco, 1994. Gene list and working maps. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsletter 68: 157–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creech R.G., 1965. Genetic control of carbohydrate synthesis in maize endosperm. Genetics 52: 1175–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpepper C.W. & C.A.Magoon, 1927. A study of the factors determining quality in sweet corn. J. Agr. Res. 34: 413–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass S.K., J.A.Juvik & W.E.Splittstoesser, 1993. Sweet corn seedling emergence and variation in kernel carbohydrate reserves. Seed Sci. & Technol. 21: 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evensen K.B. & C.D.Boyer, 1986. Carbohydrate composition and sensory quality of fresh and stored sweet corn. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111: 734–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flora L.F. & R.C.Wiley, 1974. Sweet corn aroma, chemical components and relative importance in the overall flavor response. J. Food Sci. 39: 770–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson J.E., D.B.Dickinson & A.M.Rhodes, 1978. The genetics of sugary enhancer(se), an independent modifier of sweet corn (su). J. of Heredity 69: 377–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garwood D.L., F.J.Mcardle, S.F.Vanderslice & J.C.Shannon, 1976. Postharvest carbohydrate transformations and processed quality of high sugar maize genotypes. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 101: 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L.C. & D.J.Cantliffe, 1977. Percentage stands and sugars in four Florida sweet corn. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 90: 412–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headrick J.M., J.K.Pataky & J.A.Juvik, 1990. Relationships among carbohydrates of kernels, conditions of silks after pollination and the response of sweet corn inbred lines to infection of kernels by Fusarium moniliforme. Phytopathol 80: 487–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm J.L. & M.S.Zuber, 1969. Pericarp thickness on dent corn inbred lines. Crop Sci. 9: 803–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvik J.A. & D.R.LaBonte, 1988. Single-kernel analysis for the presence of sugary enhancer (se) gene in sweet corn. HortScience 23: 384–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer A., R.B.Guyer & L.E.Ide, 1949. Factors affecting the objective and organoleptic evaluation of quality in sweet corn. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 54: 342–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBonte D.R. & J.A.Juvik, 1989. Characterization of sugary1 (su1) and sugary enhancer (se1) kernels in segregating maize (Zea mays L.) population. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114: 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall S.W., 1987. Sweet corn. p. 431–445. In: S.A.Watson & P.E.Ramstad (Eds). Chemestry and Technology. Am. Assoc. Cereal Chemists, Inc., St Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels T.E. & R.H.Andrew, 1986. Sugar accumulation in shrunken-2 sweet corn kernels. Crop Sci. 26: 104–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc., 1987. SAS© User's Guide: Statistics, 6th Ed., SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon E.W., 1978. Plant membranes under dry conditions. Pesticide Sci. 9: 168–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberalske R.M. & R.H.Andrew, 1978. Gene effects on kernel moisture and sugars of near-isogenic lines of sweet corn. Crop Sci. 75: 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styer R.C., D.J.Cantliffe & L.C.Hannah, 1980. Differential seed and seedling vigor in shrunken-2 compared to three other genotypes of corn at various stages of development. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105: 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Styer R.C. & D.J.Cantliffe, 1983. Changes in seed structure and composition during development and their effects on leakage in two endosperm mutants of sweet corn. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108: 717–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy W.F. & J.A.Juvik, 1988. Electrolyte leakage and seed quality in a shrunken2 population of maize selected for improved field emergence. HortScience 23: 391–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann E.V., G.B.Brown & W.A.Hills, 1971. Genetic modifications of sweet corn quality. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 96: 441–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong A.D., J.A.Juvik, D.C.Breeden & J.M.Swiader, 1994. Shrunken2 sweet corn yield and the chemical components of quality. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119: 747–755.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Azanza, F., Bar-Zur, A. & Juvik, J.A. Variation in sweet corn kernel characteristics associated with stand establishment and eating quality. Euphytica 87, 7–18 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022959

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022959

Key words

Navigation