Skip to main content
Log in

The physiology of variation in the time of ear emergence among wheat varieties from different regions of the world

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Differences in response to photoperiod and vernalization and genetic variation independent of photoperiod and vernalization (earliness per se), affecting time of ear emergence of wheat, were identified in controlled environment experiments with 33 varieties of diverse geographical origin. The results were compared with an analysis of time of ear emergence of 10409 T. aestivum accessions from the USDA Small Grain Collection grown from autumn sowings in Pendleton, Oregon, and spring sowings in Fargo, North Dakota. The effect of differences in photoperiod and vernalization sensitivity on time of ear emergence was similar to the effect of earliness per se, both under controlled environment conditions and in the field. Most of the accessions from low latitude regions reached ear emergence rapidly owing to their insensitivity to photoperiod and vernalization and earliness per se factors accelerating ear emergence. Lateness was common among accessions from Northern Europe, Afghanistan and Turkey, which was due to sensitivity to photoperiod and vernalization, and to earliness per se factors delaying ear emergence. The physiological basis of earliness per se is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnon I., 1972. Wheat. In: Crop production in dry regions. Vol. 2. Systematic treatment of the principal crops. Leonard Hill, London. p. 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch R. H. & D. D. Chamberlain, 1981. Effects of daylength response and semi-dwarfism on agronomic performance of spring wheat. Crop Sci. 21: 57–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford M. A., R. B. Austin, W. J. Angus & G. C. M. Sage, 1981. Relationships between the responses of spring wheat genotypes to temperature and photoperiodic treatment and their performance in the field. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 96: 623–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh T., 1977. Varietal differences in photoperiodic and thermal responses of wheat. Jap. J. Breed. 27: 57–69 (Jap., English summ.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh T., 1979. Factors determining varietal differences of heading behavior of wheats. Jap. Agric. Res. Q. 13: 222–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halse N. J. & R. N. Weir, 1970. Effects of vernalization, photoperiod and temperature on phenological development and spikelet number of Australian wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 21: 383–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn J., 1984. A comparison of different vernalization techniques in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant Phys. 116: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn J., 1985a. A reciprocal F1 monosomic analysis of the genetic control of time of ear emergence, number of leaves and number of spikelets in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 34: 545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn J., 1985b. The basis of variation in date of ear emergence under field conditions among the progeny of a cross between two winter wheat varieties. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 104: 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt L. A., 1979. Photoperiodic responses of winter wheats, from different climatic regions. J. Plant Breed. 82: 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law C. N. & R. Scarth, 1984. Genetics and its potential for understanding the action of light in flowering. In: D. Vince-Prue (Ed.), Light and the flowering process. Academic Press, London. p. 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law C. N., J. W. Snape & A. J. Worland, 1981. Intra-specific chromosome manipulation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 292: 509–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualset C. O. & Y. P. Puri, 1973. Heading time in a world collection of durum wheat: photo-and thermal-sensitivity related to latitudinal responses and geographic origins. In: GscG. T. Scarascia-Mugnozza (Ed.). Genetics and breeding of durum wheat. Univ. Bari, Italy: 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M. S. & J. H. Wilson, 1978. Determination of spikelet number in wheat. III. Effect of varying temperature on ear development. Austr. J. Agric. Res. 29: 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell J. A. & G. A. Gries, 1958. Development of spring wheat. II. The effect of temperature on responses to photoperiod. Agron. J. 50: 739–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarth R. & C. N. Law, 1984. The control of the daylength response in wheat by the group 2 chromosomes. J. Plant Breed. 92: 140–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme J. R., 1968. Ear emergence of Australian, Mexican and European wheats in relation to time of sowing and their response to vernalization and daylength. Austr. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 8: 578–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall P. C. & P. M. Cartwright, 1974. Effects of photoperiod, temperature and vernalization on the phenology and spikelet numbers of spring wheats. Ann. Appl. Biol. 76: 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda S. & H. Shimoyama, 1965. Analysis of internal factors influencing the heading time of wheat varieties. Ber. Ohara Inst. Landw. Biol., Okavama Univ. 13: 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven A. C. & N. Ch. Zeven-Hissink, 1975. Genealogies of 14000 wheat varieties. Netherlands Cereals Centre (NGC), Wageningen, & CIMMYT, Mexico: 121 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoogendoorn, J. The physiology of variation in the time of ear emergence among wheat varieties from different regions of the world. Euphytica 34, 559–571 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00022955

Index words

Navigation