Skip to main content
Log in

Physical properties of two-component growth media based on Sphagnum peat and their implications for plant-available water and aeration

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The physical properties, in particular the water retention characteristics, of two-component growth media based on low-humified Sphagnum peat were studied. The high water retention of pure peat, which is further increased by shrinkage of the medium at desorption, yielded low air-filled porosity at high matric potentials (≥ −1 kPa). The addition of coarse perlite to peat decreased the shrinkage markedly and also tended to increase the low saturated hydraulic conductivity of peat, which had initially been rather low. In all media studied, the amount of water that is easily available to plants (water content retained between −1 and −10 kPa matric potential) was relatively high. In peat that contained half repellent rockwool or hydrogel, this water retention was, however, markedly lower. Between −10 and −50 kPa matric potential, water retention was rather low in all media (< 10%). Within the lowest matric potential range studied (−50 to −1500 kPa), water retention was considerably elevated in peat that contained half hydrogel. The implications of the physical properties of the media for plant-available water and aeration in the media are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bunt A C 1988 Media and mixes for container-grown plants. A manual on the preparation and use of growing media for pot plants. 2nd ed. Unwin Hyman, London, 309 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Banin A and Ataman Y 1980 Characterization of particles and pores, hydraulic properties and water-air ratios of artificial growth media and soils. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Soilless Culture. May 18–24. pp 63–82. ISOSC, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoodt M and Verdonck O 1972 The physical properties of the substrates in horticulture. Acta Hort. 26, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikhof R H, King P A and Moline S W 1973 The influence of a hydrophilic polymer on the water requirements and shelf life of container grown plants. Nat. Agric. Plastics Assoc. Conf. Proc. 11, 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery R L and Busscher W J 1982 Use of a synthetic polymer in potting soils to improve water holding capacity. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 13, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonteno W C and Nelson P V 1990 Physical properties of and plant responses to rockwool-amended media. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115, 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring J M and Lewis A J 1980 Effect of hydrogel on wilting and moisture stress of bedding plants. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 105, 511–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handreck K A 1983 Particle size and the physical properties of growing media for containers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 14, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes R J and Goh K M 1978 Evaluation of potting media for commercial nursery production of container-grown plants. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 21, 449–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J 1992 Comparison of three methods for determining the particle density of soil with liquid pycnometers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23, 841–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J 1993 Favourable water and aeration conditions for 0 growth media used in containerized tree seedling production: A review. Scand. J. For. Res. 8, 337–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J 1993 Variation in water retention characteristics of 0 peat growth media used in tree nurseries. Silva Fenn. 27, 77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J 1993 Water potential and hydraulic conductivity of 0 peat growth media in containers during drying. Silva Fenn. 27, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J 1994 Effect of peat-based two-component growth 0 media on the growth of containerized Scots pine seedlings. Suo 45, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiskanen J 1994b Irrigation regime affects water and aeration conditions in peat growth medium and the growth of containerized Scots pine seedlings. New For. (In press).

  • Heiskanen J 1994 Water status of Sphagnum peat and a peat-perlite mixture in containers subjected to different irrigation regimes. HortScienceIn press).

  • Jackson D K 1974 Some characteristics of perlite as an experimental growth medium. Plant and Soil 40, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins J R and Jarrell W M 1989 Predicting physical and chemical properties of container mixtures. HortScience 24, 292–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson M S 1984 Effect of soluble salts on water absorption by gelforming soil conditioners. J. Sci. Food. Agric. 35, 1063–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute A and Dirksen C 1986 Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9. Am. Soc. Agric. Ed. AKlute, pp 687–734. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Publisher, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis T D, Tinus R W, McDonald S E and Barnett J P 1990 Containers and growing media. The container tree nursery manual. Vol 2. USDA, Forest Service, Washinghton DC. Agric. Handbook 674. 87 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langerud B R 1986 A simple in situ method for the characterization of porosity in growth media. Plant and Soil 93, 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox T L and Lumis G P 1987 Evaluation of physical properties of several growing media for use in aerial seedling containers. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson P V and Fonteno W C 1991 Physical analysis of rockwool slabs and effects of fiber orientation, irrigation frequency and production technique on Chrysanthemum production. J. Plant Nutr. 14, 835–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puustärvi V 1977 Peat and its use in horticulture. Turveteollisuuslitto ry. Publication 3. Liikekirjapaino, Helsinki, 160 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard F, Chausson J-S and Surber E 1958 The influence of soil moisture tension and soil structure on the growth of young spruce seedlings. Mitt. Schweiz. Anst. Forstl. Versuchsw. 34, 1–34. In German with English summary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scagel R K and Davis G A 1988 Recommendations and alternative growing media for use in containerized nursery production of conifers: Some physical and chemical properties of media and amendments. USDA, For. Serv. Rocky Mountain Experiment Station. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM- 167, 60–65.

  • Sillanpää M 1956 Studies on the hydraulic conductivity of soils and its measurement. Acta Agric. Fenn. 87, 1–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • daSilva F F, Wallach R and Chen Y 1993 Hydraulic properties of Sphagnum peat moss and tuff (scoria) and their potential effects on water availability. Plant and Soil 154, 119–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor K C and Halfacre R G 1986 The effect of hydrophilic polymer on media water retention and nutrient availability. HortScience 21, 1159–1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripepi R R, George M W, Dumroese R K and Wenny D L 1991 Birch seedling response to irrigation frequency and a hydrophilic polymer amendment in a container medium. J. Environ. Hort. 9, 119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonck O 1983 New developments in the use of graded perlite in horticultural substrates. Acta Hort. 150, 575–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonck O, Pennick R and DeBoodt M 1983 The physical properties of different horticultural substrates. Acta Hort. 150, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse J and Johnson M S 1991 Water storing soil polymers and the growth of trees. Arboric. J. 15, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heiskanen, J. Physical properties of two-component growth media based on Sphagnum peat and their implications for plant-available water and aeration. Plant Soil 172, 45–54 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020858

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00020858

Key words

Navigation