Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of hydropower-induced flow perturbations on mayfly (Ephemeroptera) richness and abundance in north Swedish river rapids

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mayfly species richness and abundance were investigated at 52 Swedish river rapids. These were either unregulated, or regulated with or without reduced discharge. Sites impacted by regulation had lower mayfly richness and abundances than unregulated reference sites. The relative importance of reduced discharge, daily fluctuations in flow, flow constancy, and the distance to nearest rapid (as a measure of isolation) was evaluated in multiple regression analyses. These indicated negative effects of diel fluctuations on both abundance and richness, whereas flow constancy was favourable for richness. Neither the distance to nearest rapid nor reduced flow were significantly related to mayfly richness and abundance. In total, 26 mayfly species were recorded. Only Baetis rhodani was found at all sites, but another five species were present at more than 40 sites. The strongest effects were found for species within the Heptageniidae. Nineteen of 20 mayfly species present in both the regulated (with unreduced flow) and unregulated reference rapids were on average more common in the unregulated ones. Mayfly assemblage structure was primarily influenced by regional factors and nutrient status, although daily fluctuations in flow together with rapids dimensions also had a significant influence. No rare species appears to be threatened by hydropower regulation though it is conceivable that depressed abundances in regulated rivers indirectly influence predators and periphyton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armitage, P. D., 1976. A quantitative study of the invertebrate fauna of the River Tees below Cow Green Reservoir. Freshwat. Biol. 6: 229–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. D., 1978. Downstream changes in the composition, numbers and biomass of bottom fauna in the Tees below Cow Green reservoir, and in an unregulated tributary Maize Beck, in the first five years after impoundment. Hydrobiologia 58: 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. D., R. J. M. Gunn, M. T. Furse, J. F. Wright & D. Moss, 1987. The use of prediction to assess macroinvertebrate response to river regulation. Hydrobiologia 144: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, J. E., 1982. Biology of mayflies. Ann. Rev. Ent. 27: 119–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, J. E. & S. J. Saltveit, 1989. A review of the effect of river regulation on mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Regulated Rivers 3: 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, M. P. & D. L. Morris, 1980. A survey of macroinvertebrate riffle fauna of the rivers Ystwyth and Rheindol, Wales. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 459–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusven, M. A., C. MacPhee & R. Biggam, 1974. Effects of water fluctuation on benthic insects. In: Anatomy of a river, Pacific Northwest river basin commission report, Vancouver, Washington: 67–79.

  • Cowx, I. G., W. O. Young & J. M. Hellawell, 1984. The influence of drought on the fish and invertebrate populations of an upland stream in Wales. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degerman, E., B. Fernholm & P.-E. Lingdell, 1994. Bottenfauna och fisk i sjöar och vattendrag — utbredning i Sverige. Naturviråsverket, Rapport 4345. [in Swedish].

  • Dudgeon, D., 1991. An experimental study of the effects of predatory fish on macroinvertebrates in a Hong Kong stream. Freshwat. Biol. 25: 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund, G. & B. Malmqvist, 1996. Effects of flow regulation, habitat area and isolation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of rapids in North Swedish rivers. Regulated Rivers 12: 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englund, G., B.-G Johnsson & B. Malmqvist, 1996. Effects of flow regulation on bryophytes in North Swedish rivers. Biol. Cons. (in press).

  • Englund, G., B. Mahnqvist & Y. Zhang. Use of predictions to estimate effects of flow regulations on net-spinning caddis larvae in large North Swedish rivers. Freshwat. Biol. (in press).

  • Garnås, E., 1985. Effects of reduced discharge on benthos and fish from 1982–1984 in Søre Osa, Hedmark. Report, DVF-Reguleringsundersøkelsene 9: 1–84, [in Norwegian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gislason, J. C., 1995: Aquatic insect abundance in a regulated stream under fluctuating and stable diel flow patterns. N. am. J. Fish. Mgmt 5: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundsten, C., 1991. Sjöar och vattendrag. In Bernes, C. & C. Grundsten (eds), Sveriges nationalatlas. Miljön, SNA, Stockholm. [in Swedish].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, F. R., J. A. Stanford & J. V. Ward, 1989. Serial discontinuities in a Rocky Mountain river. II. Distribution and abundance of Trichoptera. Regulated Rivers 3: 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, W. R & A. W. Knight, 1987. Experimental analysis of the grazing interaction between a mayfly and stream algae. Ecology 68: 1955–1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press.

  • Lancaster, J., 1990. Predation and drift of lotic macroinvertebrates during colonization. Oecologia 85: 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langeland, A. & T. Haukebø, 1979. Trout, burbot and bottom invertebrates in the river Nea, Central Norway, before building of weirs. Informasjon Terskelprojektet 9: 1–56 pp., NVE-Vassdragsdirektoratet, Oslo, [in Norwegian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Odin, H., B. Eriksson & K. Perttu, 1983. Temperature climate maps for Swedish forestry. Reports in forest ecology and forest soils, No. 45. Department of forest soils, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. A. & W. B. Perry, 1986. Effects of experimental flow regulation on invertebrate drift and stranding in the Flathead and Kootenai Rivers, Montana, USA. Hydrobiologia 134: 171–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, G. E., 1984. Impounded rivers. Perspectives for ecological management. Wiley's, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward, 1989. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns. Can. J. Fish. aqut. Sci. 46: 1805–1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raddum, G. G. & A. Fjellheim, 1993. Life cycle and production of Baetis rhodani in a regulated river in western Norway: comparison of pre- and post-regulation conditions. Regulated Rivers 8: 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, R. B. & J. V. Ward, 1988. Influence of regulation on environmental conditions and the macroinvertebrate community in the upper Colorado River. Regulated Rivers 2: 597–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. P., 1990. Measures of flow variability and a new flowbased classification of Great Lakes tributaries. J. Gt Lakes Res. 16: 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltveit, S. J., T. Bremnes & J. E. Brittain, 1995. Effect of a changed temperature regime on the benthos of a Norwegian regulated river. Regulated Rivers 9: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O. & A. Johansson, 1988. Effects of habitat on development, fecundity, and susceptibility to parasites in Parameletus chelifer and Parameletus minor (Ephemeroptera). Can. J. Zool. 66: 2715–2725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, B., 1986. Sweden's mayflies (Ephemeroptera), identification of larvae. Entomologisk Tidskrift 107: 91–106, [in Swedish].

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987. CANOCO — a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by [partial] [detrended][canonical] correspondence analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2. l), Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, 95 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1990. Update notes: Canoco version 3.10. Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen, 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troelstrup, N. H. & G. L. Hergenrader, 1990. Effect of hydropower peaking flow fluctuations on community structure and feeding guilds of invertebrates colonizing artificial substrates in a large impounded river. Hydrobiologia 199: 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V., 1976. Effects of flow patterns below large dams on stream benthos: a review. In Osborne, J. F. & C. H. Allam (eds), Instream flow needs symposium 2, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda: 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. & D. Garcia de Jalón, 1991. Ephemeroptera of regulated mountain streams in Spain and Colorado. In Alba-Tercedor, J. & A. Sanchez-Ortega (eds), Overview and strategies of Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera. Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville: 567–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. D. & R. N. Winget, 1979. Ecological studies of a regulated stream: Huntingdon river, Emery County, Utah. Great Basin Naturalist 44: 231–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Ecology, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden

    Björn Malmqvist & Göran Englund

Authors
  1. Björn Malmqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Göran Englund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malmqvist, B., Englund, G. Effects of hydropower-induced flow perturbations on mayfly (Ephemeroptera) richness and abundance in north Swedish river rapids. Hydrobiologia 341, 145–158 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018118

Key words

Search

Navigation