Skip to main content
Log in

Convective-diffusive model of two-dimensional root growth and proliferation

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulations of crop productivity and environmental quality depend strongly on the root activity model used. Flexible, generic root system models are needed that can easily be coupled to various process-based soil models and can easily be modified to test various hypotheses about how roots respond to their environment. In this paper, we develop a convective-diffusive model of root growth and proliferation, and use it to test some of these hypotheses with data on the growth of roots on potted chrysanthemum cuttings. The proliferation of roots is viewed as a result of a diffusion-like gradient-driven propagation in all directions and convection-like propagation downwards caused by geotropism. The finite element method was used to solve the boundary problem for the convective-diffusive equation. To test hypotheses, we wrote modules in a way that caused a test parameter to be zero, should the hypothesis be rejected. These modules were added or removed to test each hypothesis in turn and in various combinations. The model explained 92% of the variation in the experimental data of Chen and Lieth (1993) on root growth of potted chrysanthemum cuttings. For this dataset the following hypotheses were accepted: (1) root diffusivity (colonization of new soil) did not depend on root density, (2) there was no geotropic trend in root development, (3) potential root growth increased linearly with root density, (4) there were (at least) two classes of roots with different rates of growth and proliferation, and (5) potential root growth rate decreased with distance from the plant stem base.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acock B, Reddy V R, Whisler F D, Baker D N, McKinion J M, Hodges H F and Boote K J 1983 The soybean crop simulator GLYCIM. Number 002 in series: Responses of vegetation to carbon dioxide, U.S. Dept. of Energy and Dept. of Agric. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ares J and Singh J S 1974 A model of the root biomass dynamics of a short grass prairie dominated by blue grama (Bouteloua Gracilis), J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 727–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef B, Lambert J R and Baker D N 1982 Rhizos: a simulation of root growth and soil processes, sensitivity analysis and validation for cotton. Trans. ASAE 25, 1268–1273 and 1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengough A G, Mackenzie C J and Diggle A J 1992 Relations between root length densities and root intersections with horizontal and vertical planes using root growth modelling in 3-dimensions. Plant and Soil 145, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer J S 1971 Resistances to water transport in soybean, bean and sunflower. Crop Sci. 11, 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R 1965 Water movement across the root. In The State and Movement of Water in living Organisms. Ed. C E Fogg. pp 131–149. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugge R 1985 A mechanistic model of grass root growth and development dependent upon photosynthesis and nitrogen uptake. J. Theor. Biol. 116, 443–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugge R and Thornley J H M 1985 A growth model of root mass and vertical distribution, dependent on carbon substrate from photosynthesis and with nonlimiting soil conditions. Ann. Bot. 55, 563–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausnitzer V and Hopmans J W 1994 Simultaneous modelling of transient three dimensional root growth and soil water flow. Plant and Soil 164, 299–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen De-Xing and Lieth J H 1993 A two-dimensional, dynamic model for root growth distribution of potted plants. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopart J L and Vauclin M 1990 Water balance estimation model: field test and sensitivity analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 1377–1384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle A J 1988 ROOTMAP-a model in three-dimensional coordinates of the growth and structure of fibrous root systems. Plant and Soil 105, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwitz A and Page E R 1974 An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 11, 773–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1989 Simulation of carbon assimilation and partitioning in maize. Agron. J. 81, 563–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1993 Simulation model of soil compaction and root growth: I. model structure. Plant and Soil 150, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks R J 1974 Model for predicting plant yield as influenced by water use. Agron. J. 66, 660–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen G K 1975 A dynamic continuous simulation model of water state and transportation in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. I. The model and its sensitivity. Acta Agric. Scand. 25, 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe H 1981 Analysis of a diffusion model for plant root growth and an application to plant soil-water uptake. Soil Sci. 131, 334–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillel D and Talpaz H 1976 Simulation of root growth and its effect on the pattern of soil water uptake by a nonuniform root system. Soil Sci. 121, 307–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom G and Huck M G 1986 ROOTSIMU V.4.0-a dynamic simulation of root growth, water uptake, and biomass partitioning in a soil-plant-atmosphere continuum: Update and documentation. Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn. Agronomy and Soils Dep. Ser. 109.

  • Hoogenboom G, Huck M G and Peterson C M 1988 Predicting root growth and water uptake under different soil water regimes. Agric. Systems 26, 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huck M G and Hillel D 1983 A model of root growth and water uptake accounting for photosynthesis, respiration, transpiration and soil hydraulics. In Advances in Irrigation, Vol. 2. Ed. D Hillel. pp 273–333. Academic Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe M J, Takahashi H and Biro R L 1985 A pea mutant for the study of hydrotropism in roots. Science 230, 445–447,

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C A, Bland W L, Ritchie J T and Williams J R 1990 Simulation of root growth. In Modelling Plant and Soil Systems. Eds. J Y Ritchie and R J Hanks. pp 91–123. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson I R and Thornley J H M 1985 Dynamic model of the response of a vegetative grass crop to light, temperature and nitrogen. Plant Cell Environ. 8, 485–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B and Rickman R W 1990 Modelling crop root growth and function. Adv. Agron. 44, 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marani A, Cardon G E and Phene C J 1992 CALGOS, a version of GOSSYM adapted for irrigated cotton. I. Drip irrigation, soil water transport and root growth. 1992 Beltwide Cotton Conference Proc., pp 1352–1357. National Cotton Council, Memphis, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narda K N and Curry R B 1981 SOYROOT-A, dynamic model of soybean root growth and water uptake. Trans. ASAE 24, 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pages L, Jordan M O and Picard D 1989 A simulation model of the three-dimensional architecture of the maize root system. Plant and Soil 119, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page E R and Gerwitz A 1974 Mathematical models based on diffusion equations, to describe root systems of isolated plants, row crops and swards. Plant and Soil 41, 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard J T 1977 A Handbook of numerical and statistical Techniques with Examples mainly from the life Sciences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter J R, Klepper B and Belford R K 1986 A, model (WHTROOT) which sychronizes root growth and development with shoot development for winter wheat. Plant and Soil 92, 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson M J, Fukai S, Hammer G L and Ludlow M M 1993 Modelling root growth of grain sorghum using the CERES approach. Field Crops Res. 33, 113–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose D A 1983 The description of the growth of root systems. Plant and Soil 75, 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shein E V and Pachepsky Ya A 1995 Influence of root density on the critical soil water potential. Plant and Soil 171, 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibusawa S 1992 Hierarchical modelling of a branching root system based on L-system. Acta Hortic. 319, 659–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk W K and Ericson R O 1979 Kinematics of plant growth. J. Theor. Biol. 76, 481–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbaiah R and Rao K A 1993 Root growth simulation model under specified environment. J. Irrig. Drainage Eng. 119, 898–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timlin D J, Heatmann G C and Ahuja L R 1992 Solute leaching in crop row vs. interrow zones. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 384–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timlin J D, Pachepsky Ya A and Acock B 1996 A design for a modular generic soil simulator to interface with plant models. Agron. J. (In press).

  • Van Genuchten M Th 1981 Non-equilibrium transport parameters from miscible displacementexperiments. Research Res. No. 119. US Salinity Laboratory, USDA-SEA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acock, B., Pachepsky, Y.A. Convective-diffusive model of two-dimensional root growth and proliferation. Plant Soil 180, 231–240 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015306

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015306

Key words

Navigation