Skip to main content
Log in

An improved technique for sampling lotic invertebrates

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sampling of individual stones to quantify benthic community structure has several advantages over traditional area-restricted samplers. Processing effort can be reduced, and density and error estimates that account for variation due to substratum heterogeneity and dispersion of organisms can be determined. Although the Doeg & Lake stone sampler is used to collect stream fauna from stones, our preliminary observations suggested that this sampler overestimated invertebrate density. A U net sampler is described that produces more accurate estimates of faunal density of individual stones. Performances of the U net and Doeg & Lake stone sampler were evaluated by collecting invertebrates from replicate cobbles (maximum diameter 128–256 mm) within a fourth-order stream and comparing respective estimates of invertebrate density, sample variance, and relative abundance. The Doeg & Lake sampler consistently overestimated invertebrate density compared with estimates from the U net. Differences in density estimates were due to increased disturbance of invertebrates due to placement of the Doeg & Lake sampler on the substratum compared to the U net technique. The number of taxa, species diversity (H') and sample variation collected from cobbles with the two samplers were similar. By isolating the fauna of individual stones; the U net produced accurate estimates of density and relative abundance of taxa. The U net sampler is an effective tool for collecting quantitative samples of stream macroinvertebrates because it can be used to quantify invertebrate faunas of large substrata where traditional, area-restricted samplers are ineffective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boulton, A. J., G. M. Spangaro & P. S. Lake, 1988. Macroinvertebrate distribution and recolonization on stones subjected to varying degrees of disturbance: an experimental approach. Arch. Hydrobiol. 113: 551–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeg, T. & P. S. Lake, 1981. A technique for assessing the composition and density of the macroinvertebrate fauna of large stones. Hydrobiologia 80: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. W. J. & F. J. Wrona, 1992. Life history and production of the predatory caddisfly Rhyacophila vao Milne in a spring-fed stream. Freshwat. Biol.: 27: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A., 1979. Aggregation, transformation, and the design of benthos sampling programs. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 36: 1454–1463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. & P. S. Lake, 1984. Diel changes in the benthos of stones and of drift in a southern Australian upland stream. Hydrobiologia 111: 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E., 1982. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Brooks/Cole Publ., USA. pp. 911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, P. S. & T. J. Doeg, 1985. Macroinvertebrate colonization of stones in two upland southern Australian streams. Hydrobiologia 126: 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist, B. & C. Otto, 1987. The influence of substrate stability on the composition of stream benthos: an experimental study. Oikos 48: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe, J. R., 1984. Competition for space, disturbance, and the structure of a benthic stream community. Ecology 65: 894–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhone, M. J. & R. W. Davies, 1983. The influence of rock surface area on the microdistribution and sampling of attached riffle-dwelling Trichoptera in Hartley Creek, Alberta. Can. J. Zool. 61: 2300–2304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, A., 1985. Variability of density estimates and the optimization of sampling programs for stream benthos. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1530–1534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky, B. L., 1991. Habitat selection by stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 48: 1069–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, J. D., 1984. Efficiency estimates for various quadrat sizes used in benthic sampling. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 41: 1485–1489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, R. B. & J. V. Ward, 1990. Diel migration and microhabitat distribution of a benthic stream assemblage. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 711–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. L., 1979. Cost and precision in a stream sampling program. Hydrobiologia 111: 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. F., 1969. Invertebrate drift-ecology and significance to stream fishes. Proceedings of the symposium on salmon and trout in streams, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrona, F. J., P. Calow, I. Ford, L. Maltby & D. J. Baird, 1986. Estimating the abundance of stone-dwelling organisms: a new method. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 43: 2025–2035.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrona, F. J. & R. W. J. Dixon, 1991. Group size and predation risk: a field analysis of encounter and dilution effects. Am. Nat. 137: 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical analysis. 2nd edn. PrenticeHall Publ., USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scrimgeour, G.J., Culp, J.M. & Glozier, N.E. An improved technique for sampling lotic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 254, 65–71 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014309

Key words

Navigation