Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of sampling method on the classification of wetland macroinvertebrate communities

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Macroinvertebrate communities sampled by a corer, plankton net and sweep net from five wetlands on the Swan Coastal Plain were compared. The composition of the fauna collected in sweeps and tows was generally similar and differed from that collected in the cores. Cores caught fewer species than tows and sweeps at all wetlands and did not capture fast swimming hemipterans or less abundant taxa. The highest species richness was recorded in sweep samples in four out of the five wetlands. Classification (TWIN-SPAN) and ordination (SSH) of the samples collected in sweeps and tows gave good separation of the wetlands, whereas classification of core samples did not. Coring appeared to be the least suitable sampling method for describing the major components of the macroinvertebrate communities of these wetlands. Plankton tows were useful if the time available for sorting was limited as these samples were free of sediments and generally gave similar results to those obtained with sweeps. Sweeps appeared to be the most useful method for a large classification study as they collected more species and resulted in the best discrimination amongst wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belbin, L., 1989. PATN Users Guide. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, A. J., 1985. A sampling device that quantitatively collects benthos in flowing or standing waters. Hydrobiologia 127: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare, P. & R. W. Edwards, 1983. The macroinvertebrate fauna of the drainage channels of the Gwent Levels, South Wales. Freshwat. Biol. 13: 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, D. T., 1962. Estimates of the annual production of Corixa germani (Fieb) in an upland reservoir. Arch. Hydrobiol. 58: 210–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. & S. W. Rolls, 1987. A baseline biological monitoring programme for the urban wetlands of the Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia: seasonal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna and water chemistry of five Perth lakes. Bulletin 265 Environmental Protection Authority (WA)/Water Authority of Western Australia, Perth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A., 1984. Sampling the benthos of standing waters. In A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters. Downing, J. A & F. H. Rigler (eds), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 87–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A. & H. Cyr, 1985. Quantitative estimation of epiphytic invertebrate populations. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1570–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A. & F. H. Rigler, 1984. A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh water. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friday, L. E., 1987. The diversity of macroinvertebrate and macrophyte communities in ponds. Freshwat. Biol. 18: 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furse, M. T., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & P. D. Armitage, 1984. The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running-water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerking, S. D., 1957. A method of sampling the littoral macrofauna and its application. Ecology 38: 221–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellawell, J. M., 1986. Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management. Pollution Monitoring Series. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979. TWINSPAN — a Fortran Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two-way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Ecology and Systematics Section, Cornell University: Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S., 1978. Influences of transformation of cover values on classification and ordination of lake vegetation. Vegetatio. 37: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K. & T. Wiederholm, 1989. Classification and ordination of profundal macroinvertebrate communities in nutrient poor, oligomesohumic lakes in relation to environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 21: 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajak, Z., 1971. Benthos of standing water. In A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary production in fresh waters, G. G. Winberg (ed.) Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 25–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski, R. M. & H. R. Murkin, 1981. Evaluation of two devices for sampling nektonic invertebrates. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 45: 493–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der., 1979. Transformation of coverabundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio. 39: 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macan, T. T., 1949. Survey of a moorland fishpond. J. anim. Ecol. 18: 160–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, R., 1990. Robustness of classification and ordination techniques applied to macroinvertebrate communities from the La Trobe River, Victoria. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 41: 493–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, V. J. E., 1975. Two new quantitative samplers for aquatic phytomacrofauna. Hydrobiologia 47: 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milbrink, G. & T. Wiederholm, 1973. Sampling efficiency of four types of mud samplers. Oikos 24: 479–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minto, M. L., 1977. A sampling device for the invertebrate fauna of aquatic vegetation. Freshwat. Biol. 7: 425–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murkin, H. R., P. G. Abbott & J. A. Kadlec, 1983. A comparison of activity traps and sweep nets for sampling nektonic invertebrates in wetlands. Freshwat. Invert. Biol. 2: 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neckles, H. A., H. R. Murkin & J. A. Cooper, 1990. Influences of seasonal flooding on macroinvertebrate abundance in wetland habitats. Freshwat. Biol. 23: 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, S. J. & R. W. Edwards, 1987. The ordination and classification of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the catchment of the River Wye in relation to environmental factors. Freshwat. Biol. 17: 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, C. G. & C. H. Fernando, 1971. A comparison of a sample corer and an Ekman grab for sampling shallowwater benthos. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 28: 365–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. M, & C. W. Hickey, 1990. Characterisation and classification of benthic invertebrate communities in 88 New Zealand rivers in relation to environmental factors. NZ. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 24: 387–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, A. W., S. E. Bunn, P. M. Davies & D. H. Edward, 1990. Classification of the macroinvertebrate fauna of two river systems in southwestern Australia in relation to physical and chemical parameters. Reg. Rivers Res. & Mgmt 5: 217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, A. W., D. H. Edward & P. Gazey, 1991. Surber and kick sampling; A comparison for the assessment of macroinvertrebrate community structure in streams of southwestern Australia. Hydrobiologia 211: 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, M. C. & C. Lindegaard, 1980. Complementary procedures for sampling small benthic invertebrates. Oikos 35: 317–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., D. Moss, P. D. Armitage & M. T. Furse, 1984. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macroinvertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 221–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheal, F., Davis, J.A., Growns, J.E. et al. The influence of sampling method on the classification of wetland macroinvertebrate communities. Hydrobiologia 257, 47–56 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013996

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013996

Key words

Navigation