Abstract
The susceptibility of soybean cultivars (cvs) to boron (B) deficiency was examined in three experiments on a Typic Tropaqualf in Northern Thailand: one experiment also included peanut cv Tainan 9 and black gram cv Regur.
Without added B (B0), B deficiency depressed seed yield by 60% in soybean cv NW1 compared with 30% in cv SJ5, 40% in cv 7016, 45% in peanut, and 93% in black gram. B deficiency also induced a localised depression on the internal surface of one or both cotyledons of some soybean seeds resembling the symptom of ‘hollow heart’ in peanut seeds. It induced 50% hollow heart in peanut, 17% in soybean cv NW1, 5% in SJ5, and 1% in 7016: black gram seeds had no symptoms. Addition of B decreased or eliminated the symptoms.
In a comparison of 19 soybean cvs, the incidence of hollow heart symptoms in seeds at B0 varied widely from none in two cvs to 75% in cv Buchanan: cv NW1 showed intermediate susceptibility to B deficiency with 36% hollow heart in its seed while SJ5 was insensitive with 1%. Application of B eliminated hollow heart except from one seed in one cultivar. The results suggest that susceptibility to B deficiency is sufficiently important and variable among soybean genotypes to warrant its inclusion as a selection criterion when breeding cultivars for areas with low soil B.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cox F R, Adams F and Tucker B B 1982 Liming, fertilization and mineral nutrition. In Peanut Science and Technology. Eds. H EPattee and C TYoung. Amer. Peanut Res. and Educ. Soc. Inc., Texas. pp 139–164.
Harris H C and Brolman J B 1966 Comparison of calcium and boron deficiency in peanut. II. Seed quality in relation to histology and viability. Agron. J. 58, 578–582.
Harris H C and Gilman R L 1957 Effect of boron on peanuts. Soil Science 84, 233–242.
Hill W E and Morrill L G 1974 Assessing boron needs for improving peanut yield and quality Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 791–794.
Martens D C and Westermann D T 1991 Fertilizer applications for correcting micronutrient deficiencies. In Micronutrients in Agriculture. 2nd Ed. Eds. J J Mortvedt, F R Cox, L M Shuman and R M Welch. pp 549–592. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Book Series No 4.
Morrill L G, Hill W E, Chrudilmsky W W, Ashlock L O, Tripp L D, Tucker B B and Weatherly L 1977 Boron requirements of Spanish peanuts in Oklahoma: Effects on yield and quality and interaction with other nutrients. Agric. Exp. Stn. Oklahoma State Univ. Report No Mp-99.
Netsangtip R, Rerkasem B, Bell R W and Loneragan J F 1985 A field survey of boron deficiency in peanut grown in the Chiang Mai valley. Thai Agric. Res. J. 3, 171–175.
Oertli J J and Roth J A 1969 Boron nutrition of sugar beet, cotton, and soybean. Agron. J. 64, 234–237.
Rerkasem B 1990 Comparison of green gram (Vigna radiata) and blackgram (Vigna mungo) in boron deficiency. In Proc. Mungbean Meeting '90. Chiang Mai, Thailand, 23–24 Feb. 1990. Ed. CThavarasook. pp 167–174. Tropical Agric. Res. Center, Japan, Thailand Office, Bangkok.
Rerkasem B, Netsangtip R, Bell R W, Loneragan J F and Hiranburana N 1988 Comparative species responses to boron on a Typic Tropaqualf in Northern Thailand. Plant and Soil 106, 15–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rerkasem, B., Bell, R.W., Lodkaew, S. et al. Boron deficiency in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]: Symptoms in seeds and differences among soybean cultivars in susceptibility to boron deficiency. Plant Soil 150, 289–294 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013026
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00013026