Abstract
We identified factors influencing biomass and nutrient content in E. densa in an enriched pampean stream of Argentina. Physical (current velocity, temperature), chemical (pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, nutrient content in water and sediments), and biological variables (biomass and nutrient content of E. densa, biomass of periphyton and other macrophytes) were estimated at each sampling occasion, and mean monthly values estimated. Biomass and nutrient content in E. densa were correlated with these physical-chemical and biological variables. Biomass was positively correlated with ammonium in stream water (P<0.05) and sediment total nitrogen (P<0.01). Nitrogen showed a positive relationship with ammonium (P<0.01), and a negative one with nitrate and periphyton biomass (P<0.05). Phosphorus was positively correlated with soluble reactive phosphorus (P<0.01). The growth of other macrophyte species in the stream seemed to influence E. densa biomass, probably through competition for light. Current velocity was low and not significantly related with E. densa biomass, however, a flood at the beginning of the study washed the macrophyte stand downstream.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen, J. M., 1976. An ignition method for the determination of total phosphorus in lake sediments. Wat. Res. 10: 329–331.
AOAC, 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. AOAC, Arlington, 1141 pp.
APHA, 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, Washington D.C., 1268 pp.
Ashton, P. J. & D. S. Mitchell, 1989. Aquatic plants: Patterns and modes of invasion, attributes of invading species and assessment of control programmes. In J. A. Drake et al. (eds), Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, New York: 111–154.
Barko, J. W. & R. M. Smart, 1980. Mobilization of sediment phosphorus by submersed freshwater macrophytes. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 229–238.
Barko, J. W. & R. M. Smart, 1981. Comparative influences of light and temperature on the growth and metabolism of selected submersed freshwater macrophytes. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 219–235.
Barko, J. W., D. Gunnison & S. R. Carpenter, 1991. Sediment interactions with submersed macrophyte growth and community dynamics. Aquat. Bot. 41: 41–65.
Carignan, R. & R. Kalff, 1980. Phosphorus sources for aquatic weeds: Water or sediment? Science 207: 987–989.
Carpenter, S. R. & D. M. Lodge, 1986. Effects of submerged macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat. Bot. 26: 341–370.
Coffey, B. T. & J. S. Clayton, 1987. Submerged macrophytes of Lake Pupuke, Takapuna, New Zealand. N.Z.J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 21: 193–198.
Cook, C. D. K. & K. Urmi-König, 1984. A revision of the genus Egeria. Aquat. Bot. 19: 73–96.
Duarte, C. M., 1992. Nutrient concentration of aquatic plants: Patterns across species. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37: 882–889.
FAO, 1986. Manual of food quality control. 7. Food analysis: General techniques, additives, contaminants, and composition. FAO, Roma, 238 pp.
Feijoó, C., A. Giorgi, P. Calviño & F. Dutwiller, 1995. Annual variation of periphyton biomass in two plain streams with different macrophyte abundance. Abstracts XXVI SIL Congress: 310.
Frenguelli, J., 1950. Rasgos generales de la morfología y la geología de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. LEMIT 33: 1–72.
García, M. E., A. Giorgi, C. Feijoó, A. Gómez Vázquez & W. Cuevas, 1995. Estudio comparativo de los principales arroyos afluentes del río Luján. Resúmenes III Congreso Latinoamericano de Ecología: 25–9.
Giorgi, A. & L. Malacalza, 1994. Biomass variation of microphytobenthos in a plain stream. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 25: 1883–1887.
Goldberg, S., I. Cirera, M. Parella, A. Benítez, L. Bulos & A. Troncoso, 1995. Caracterización climática y agroclimática de la cuenca del Río Luján. Resúmenes Jornada sobre la Cuenca del Río Luján: 13–19.
Haramoto, T. & I. Ikusima, 1988. Life cycle of Egeria densa Planch., an aquatic plant naturalized in Japan. Aquat. Bot. 30: 389–403.
Margalef, R., 1983. Limnología. Omega, Barcelona: 939.
Matteucci, S. D. & A. Colma, 1982. Metodología para el estudio de la vegetación. OEA, Washington D.C., 168 pp.
Nakanishi, M., C. Saraceni & A. Kurata, 1989. Comparison of some limnological variables in the waters between the upper and lower littoral areas within an Egeria stand. Arch. Hydrobiol. 116: 313–331.
Reddy, K. R., J. C. Tucker & W. F. Debusk, 1987. The role of Egeria in removing nitrogen and phosphorus from nutrient enriched water. J. aquat. Plant Mgmt 25: 14–19.
Sala, J. M. & M. P. Auge, 1970. Algunas características geohidrológicas del Noreste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Resúmenes Cuartas Jornadas Geológicas Argentinas 2: 321–336.
Sala, J. M., N. González & E. Kruse, 1983. Generalización hidrológica de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Resúmenes Coloquio Internacional sobre Hidrología de Grandes Llanuras: 974–1009.
Tanner, C. C., J. S. Clayton & B. T. Coffey, 1990a. Submerged-vegetation changes in Lake Rotoroa (Hamilton, New Zealand) related to herbicide treatment and invasion by Egeria densa. N. Z. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 24: 45–57.
Tanner, C. C., R. D. S. Wells & C. P. Mitchell, 1990b. Re-establishment of native macrophytes in Lake Parkinson following weed control by grass carp. N. Z. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 24: 181–186.
Verde Claro SRL, 1994. Estudio de factibilidad de disposición y tratamiento de residuos oleosos. Technical Report, Verde Claro SRL, Luján, 35 pp.
Westlake, D. F., 1973. Aquatic macrophytes in rivers. A review. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 20: 31–40.
Wetzel, R. G., 1981. Limnología. Omega, Barcelona, 336 pp.
Wetzel, R. G. & G. E. Linkens, 1991. Limnological analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York, 391 pp.
Whittaker, R. H. & D. Goodman, 1979. Classifying species according to their demographic strategy. I. Population fluctuations and environmental heterogeneity. Am. Nat. 113: 185–200.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feijoó, C.S., Momo, F.R., Bonetto, C.A. et al. Factors influencing biomass and nutrient content of the submersed macrophyte Egeria densa Planch. in a pampasic stream. Hydrobiologia 341, 21–26 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012299
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012299