Skip to main content
Log in

Variation, co-ordination and compensation in root systems in relation to soil variability

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In soil, the distributions of nutrients, water, pores, and microbes vary in time and space. These, in turn, contribute to the variations in root form and function that we see when we grow plants in soil and other non-uniform media. This paper addresses three questions about the consequences of non-uniform distributions of nutrients: how do roots respond to variations in nutrient distribution?; how specific are such responses?; to what extent can we predict them? Roots vary both physiologically and structurally in response to nutrient distributions. The first type of response is primarily a stimulation of nutrient uptake rate per unit of root; the second, a stimulation of root growth where and when the nutrient is most readily available. The first tends to be nutrient-specific and its magnitude related to the extent of the non-uniformity in nutrient availability. The second is less-specific in the sense that the magnitude of the response, when there is one, varies little from one nutrient to another. This leads to apparently exaggerated compensatory capacity, especially for ions that are relatively mobile in soil, such as NO3 -. Because the physiological and molecular mechanisms of these responses are largely unknown, we cannot say how they are co-ordinated within individual plants. Nor can we predict a plant's responses precisely. What we can do is generate statistical descriptions of them by comparing data collected in many experiments for many species. This produces general rules that summarise what happens, but which probably cannot be applied a priori to specific cases. H Lambers Section editor

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burns I G 1980 Influence of the spatial distribution of nitrate on the uptake of N by plants: a review and a model for rooting depth. J. Soil Sci. 31, 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R 1982 The Extended Phenotype. WH Freeman, San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJager A 1982 Effects of localized supply of H2PO4, NO3, SO4, Ca and K on the production and distribution of dry matter in young maize plants. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 30, 193–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJager A 1984 Effects of localized suply of H2PO4, NO3 -, Ca and K on the concentration of that nutrient in the plant and the rate of uptake by roots in young maize plants in solution culture. Neth. J. Aric. Sci. 32, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWit C T 1953 A physical theory on placement of fertilizers. Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen no. 59. 4, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan L and Roberts K 1995 Plant development: pulled up by the roots. Curr. Opinion Genet. Dev. 5, 432–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew M C and Nye P H 1970 The supply of nutrient ions by diffusion to plant roots in soil. II. Uptake of phosphate by roots of onion, leek and rye-grass. Plant and Soil 33, 545–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew M C 1975 Comparison of the effects of a localized supply of phosphate, nitrate, ammonium and potassium on the growth of the seminal root system, and the shoot, of barley. New Phytol. 75, 479–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersani M and Sachs T 1992 Developmental correlations between roots in heterogeneous environments. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gile P L and Carrero O J 1917 Absorption of nutrients as affected by the number of roots supplied with the nutrient. J. Agric. Res. 9, 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imsande J and Touraine B 1994 N demand and the regulation of nitrate uptake. Plant Physiol. 105, 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M B 1993 Are plant hormones involved in root to shoot communication? Adv. Bot. Res. 19, 103–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B and Caldwell M M 1993 Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J. Ecol. 81, 683–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R B, Manwaring J H and Caldwell M M 1990 Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localized soil enrichment. Nature 344, 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Simpson R J, Beilharz V C and Dalling M J 1982 Growth and translocation of C and N in wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown with a split root system. Physiol. Plant. 56, 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee R B 1982 Selectivity and kinetics of ion uptake by barley plants following nutrient deficiency. Ann. Bot. 50, 429–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd edition, Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E 1982 The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nable R O and Loneragan J F 1984 Translocation of manganese in subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L. cv. Seaton Park). II. Effects of leaf senescence and of restricting supply of manganese to part of a split root system. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11, 113–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye P H and Tinker P B 1977 Solute Movement in the Soil-Root System. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipson J J and Coutts M P 1977 The influence of mineral nutrition on the root development of trees. II. The effect of specific nutrient elements on the growth of individual roots of Sitka spruce. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 864–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce G J and Ollason J G 1987 Eight reasons why optimal foraging theory is a complete waste of time. Oikos 49, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson G P, Crum J R and Ellis B G 1993 The spatial variability of soil resources following long term disturbance. Oecologia 96, 451–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D 1994a Resource capture by single roots.In Resource Capture by Crops. Eds. J LMonteith, R KScott and M H Unsworth. pp 53–76. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D 1994b The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytol. 127, 635–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D 1996 Resource capture by localised root proliferation: why do plants bother? Ann. Bot. 77, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Linehan D J and Gordon D C 1994 Capture of nitrate from soil by wheat in relation to root length, nitrogen inflow and availability. New Phytol. 128, 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott B J and Robson A D 1991 The distribution of Mg, P and K in the split roots of subterranean clover. Ann. Bot. 67, 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer P S, McCombie W R, Sundaresen V and Martienssen R A 1995 Gene trap tagging of PROLIFERA, an essential MCM2–3–5-like gene inArabidopsis. Science 268, 877–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas H 1994 Resource rejection by higher plants.In Resource Capture by Crops. Eds. J LMonteith, R KScott and M HUnsworth. pp 375–385. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanVuuren M M I, Robinson D and Griffiths B S 1995 Nutrient inflow and root proliferation during the exploitation of a temporally and spatially discrete source of nitrogen in soil. Plant and Soil 178, 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanai J, Linehan D J, Robinson D, Young I M, Hackett C A, Kyuma K and Kosaki T 1996 Effects of inorganic nitrogen application on the dynamics of the soil solution composition in the root zone of maize in a Scottish soil. Plant and Soil (In press).

  • Zwieniecki M A and Newton M 1995 Roots growing in rock fissures: their morphological adaptation. Plant and Soil 172, 181–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, D. Variation, co-ordination and compensation in root systems in relation to soil variability. Plant Soil 187, 57–66 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011657

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011657

Key words

Navigation