Skip to main content
Log in

The accuracy of population density estimates of copepods and cladocerans, using data from Tjeukemeer (the Netherlands) as an example

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of subsampling and of the variation within and among sampling stations on the accuracy of the estimates of mean population densities for copepods and cladocerans are examined. For the computation of the coefficient of variation in the mean, the sample variance of log transformed data is appropriate. Accuracy is primarily influenced by variation between sampling stations and to a lesser extent by the variation within a sampling station, while subsampling variation has only a minor effect on the accuracy as long as more than 25 individuals per subsample are counted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beattie, D. M., H. L. Golterman & J. Vijverberg, 1978. An introduction to the Limnology of the Friesian Lakes. Hydrobiologia 58: 49–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bottrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M. Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzig, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T. Weglenska, 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norw. J. Zool. 24: 419–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassie, R. M., 1962. Frequency distribution models in the ecology of plankton and other organisms. J. anim. Ecol. 31: 65–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conquest, L. L., 1983. Assessing the statistical effectiveness of ecological experiments: Utility of the coefficient of variation. Int. J. envir. Stud. 20: 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, A., 1975. The importance of zooplankton in the ecology of reservoirs. Pap. Proc. Wat. Res. Cent. Symp. Effects of Storage on Wat. Qual., Wat. Res. Cent., Medmemham: 248–272.

  • Evans, M. S. & D. W. Sell, 1983. Zooplankton sampling strategies for environmental studies. Hydrobiologia 99: 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. J., W. E. Cooper & E. E. Werner, 1970. An experimental approach to the production dynamics and structure of freshwater animal communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15: 839–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1957. A Treatise on Limnology, 1. Geography, physics and chemistry. Wiley-Interscience, N.Y., 1015 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1967. A Treatise on Limnology, 2. Introduction to lake biology and limnoplankton. Wiley-Interscience, N.Y., 1115 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabin, A., 1971. A comparison of two methods of sampling the plankton predator Leptodora kindtii (Focke) (Crustacea, Cladocera). Bull. Acad. pol. Sci. 2. Ser, Sci. biol. 19: 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kott, P., 1953. Modified whirling apparatus for subsampling of plankton. Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res. 4: 387–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langeland, A. & S. Rognerud, 1974. Statistical analyses used in the comparison of three methods of freshwater zooplankton sampling. Arch. Hydrobiol. 73: 403–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, P., 1978. The life cycle dynamics and production of zooplankton in Ovre Heimdalsvatn. Holarct. Ecol. 1: 162–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrink, G., 1968. A microstratification sampler for mud and water. Oikos 19: 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, N. C., 1980. Secondary production. In E. D. Le Cren & R. H. Lowe-McConnel (eds.), The functioning of freshwater ecosystems. Int. biol. Progm 22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 247–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, H. W., de, H. J. Bromley & J. Vijverberg, 1980. Distribution patterns of zooplankton in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. J. Plankton Res. 2: 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patalas, K., 1954. Comparative studies on a new type of selfacting watersampler for plankton and hydrochemical investigation. Ekol. pol. 2: 231–242 (in polish, English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. W., 1969. Two useful devices for vertical plankton and water sampling. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 1948–1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, D. W. & M. S. Evans, 1982. A statistical analysis of subsampling and an evaluation of the Folsom plankton splitter. Hydrobiologia 94: 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1969. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman Cooper & Co., S. Francisco, 776 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijverberg, J. & A. F. Richter, 1982a. Population dynamics and production of Acanthocyclops robustus (Sars) and Mesocyclops leuckarti (Claus) in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 95: 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijverberg, J. & A. F. Richter, 1982b. Population dynamics and production of Daphnia hyalina Leydig and Daphnia cucullata Sars in Tjeukemeer, The Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 95: 235–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Nie, H.W., Vijverberg, J. The accuracy of population density estimates of copepods and cladocerans, using data from Tjeukemeer (the Netherlands) as an example. Hydrobiologia 124, 3–11 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011391

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011391

Keywords

Navigation