Skip to main content
Log in

The role of endophytic bacteria during seed piece decay and potato tuberization

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Healthy potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum L.) cv. Kennebec were found to be internally colonized by non-pathogenic bacterial populations originating from root zone soil. These endophytic bacteria were categorized, on the basis of bioassays, as plant growth promoting (PGP), plant growth retarding (PGR) and plant growth neutral (PGN). Genera isolated from tubers included Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Xanthomonas, Agrobacterium, Actinomyces and Acinetobacter. The PGP and PGR isolates were similarly distributed throughout these genera. Bacterial populations increased in the root zone soil directly adjacent to the seed piece during and immediately following seed piece decay. Bacteria sampled at this time were capable of promoting tuber number and weight. The proportions of PGP, PGR and PGN bacteria in the root zone were altered as endophytic bacteria were released from the decaying seed piece. The study indicates that endophytic bacteria present in the seed tubers may play an important role in seed piece decay, tuberization and plant growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergey 1994 In Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Eds. J G Holt, N R Kreig, P H Sneath, J T Staley and S T Williams. 9th edition. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr T J, Schroth M N and Suslow T V 1978 Increased potato yields by treatment of seed pieces with specific strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. putida. Phytopathology 68, 1377–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark F E 1965 Agar-plate method for total microbial count. Chapter 99. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Eds. C A Black, D D Evans, J L White, L E Ensminger and F E Clark. pp 1460–1466. Am. Soc. Agronomy Inc. WI,USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciampi L R, Dubin H J and Jofre C 1976 La flora bacteriana vascular en tubérculos de papa en el sur de Chile. Fitopatologia 11, 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire J F and Greaves M P 1973 Bacteria and protozoa in the rhizosphere. Pestic. Sci. 4, 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer S H and Copeman R J 1974 Endophytic bacterial flora in Solanum tuberosum and its significance in bacterial ring rot diagnosis. Can. Plant Sci. 54, 115–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommel M I, Nowak J and Lazarovits G 1991 Growth enhancement and developmental modifications of in vitro grown potato (Solanum tuberosum ssp. tuberosum) as affected by a nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Plant Physiol. 96, 928–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommel M I, J Nowak J and Lazarovits G 1993 Treatment of potato tubers with a growth promoting Pseudomonas sp.; Plant growth responses and bacterium distribution in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 150, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genstat 1990 In Genstat 5 (Release 3), Genstat 5 Committee of the Statistics Department (Editors), Rothampstead Experimental Station. Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson B, Alström S and Rämert B 1985 Plant reactions to inoculation of roots with fungi and bacteria. Phytopathol. Z. 114, 108–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis J P 1951 Bacteria in healthy potato tissue. Phytopathology 41, 350–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W, Schippers B and Bakker P A H M 1992 Proposed elimination of the term endorhizosphere. Phytopathology 82, 726–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper J W, Shroth M N and Miller T D 1980 Effect of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology 70, 1078–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochhead A G 1940 Qualitative studies of soil organisms. Can. J. Res. 18, 42–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund B M and Wyatt G M 1972 The effect of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentration on bacterial soft rot of potatoes. I King Edward potatoes inoculated with Erwinia carotovora var atroseptica. Potato Res. 15, 174–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J M 1976 Products of soil microorganisms in relation to plant growth. CRC Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 67–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meneley J C and Stanghellini M E 1972 Occurrence and significance of soft rotting bacteria in healthy vegetables. Phytopathology 62, 778.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInroy J A and Kloepper J W 1994 Studies on Indigenous Endophytic Bacteria of Sweet Corn and Cotton. In Molecular Ecology of Rhizosphere Microorganisms. Eds. F O'Gara, D N Dowlin and B Boesten. pp 19–28. VCH, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson L W and Todd F C 1946 Bacterial soft rot of Irish potatoes as influenced by sub-lethal temperatures. Sugar and permeability changes in the tubers. Am. Potato J. 23, 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Old K M and Nicolson T H 1978 The root cortex as part of the microbial continuum. In Microbial Ecology. Eds. M W Loutit and J A R Miles. pp 291–294. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford G B 1948 The occurrence of bacteria in normal potato plants and legumes. Sci. Agric. 28, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Geels F P, Hoekstra O, Lamers J G, Maenhout C A A A and Scholte K 1985 Yield suppressions in narrow rotations caused by unknown microbial factors and their suppression by selected pseudomonads. pp. 127–30. In Ecology and Management of Soilborne Plant Pathogens. Eds. C A Parker, A Rovira, K J Moore, P T. Wong and J F Kollmorgen. pp 127–130. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad N W 1988 Initial identification of common genera. In A Laboratory Guide for the Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. 2nd edition. Ed. N W Schaad. pp 1–14. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth M N, Loper J E and Hildebrand D C 1984 Bacteria as biocontrol agents. In Current Perspectives in Microbial Ecology. Eds. M J Klug and C A Reddy. pp 362–369. Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shekhawat G S, Piplani S and Ansari M M 1984 Endophytic bacterial flora of potato plant in relation to soft rot disease. Indian J. Plant Pathol. 37, 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneh B, Dupler M, Elad Y and Baker R 1984 Chlamydospore germination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum as affected by fluorescent and lytic bacteria from Fusarium suppressive soil. Phytopathology 74, 1115–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturdy M L and Cole A L J 1974 Studies on endogenous bacteria in potato tubers infected by Phytophthora erythroseptica Pethybr. Ann. Bot. 8, 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturz A V and Christie B R 1995 Endophytic bacterial systems governing red clover growth and development. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126 (In press).

  • Suslow T V 1982 The role of root colonizing bacteria in plant growth. In Phytopathogenic Prokaryotes. Eds. M S Mount and G H Lacy. pp 187–223. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller D M 1988 Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 26, 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker M and Hankin L 1970 Physiological basis for a cycloheximide-induced Soft rot ofpotatoes by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Ann. Bot. 34, 1047–1062.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sturz, A.V. The role of endophytic bacteria during seed piece decay and potato tuberization. Plant Soil 175, 257–263 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011362

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011362

Key words

Navigation