Skip to main content
Log in

Salinity, water use and yield of maize: Testing of the mathematical model ecosys

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a need to establish how root water uptake should be calculated under saline conditions, and to test calculated uptake against experimental data recorded under documented site conditions. In this study, the ecosystem simulation model ecosys was expanded to include an ion transfer-equilibrium-exchange model used to calculated electrical conductivity and osmotic potential. This expanded model was tested against experimental data for maize growth and water use reported under different irrigation and salinity levels at four different sites in the western U.S. to determine if salinity effects on crop growth and water use could be modelled from the effects of salinity on soil osmotic potential. The model was able to reproduce reductions in water use and phytomass yields on salinized (10 g total salts kg−1 water) soils that ranged from 10 to 50% of those on non-salinized controls. In general, these reductions increased with increasing irrigation deficits. These reductions arose in the model from reduced canopy water potentials and conductances caused by reduced osmotic potentials in the saline soils. The hypothesis that salinity effects on crop growth and water use are caused by salinity effects on soil osmotic potential appear to be supported under the range of conditions included in this study. Models such as ecosys that are based on general hypotheses for the effects of salinity upon biological activity may be well adapted for general use in assessing the effects of salinity on crop growth and water use with different soils, managements and climates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul-Halim R K, Salih H M, Ahmed A A and Abdul-Rahem A M 1988 Growth and development of maxipak wheat as affected by soil salinity and moisture levels. Plant and Soil 112, 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirrezabal L A N, Pellerin S and Tardieu F 1993 Carbon nutrition, root branching and elongation: can the present state of knowledge allow a predictive approach at a whole plant level? Environ. Exp. Bot. 33, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Khafaf S, Adnan A and Al-Asadi N M 1990 Dynamics of root and shoot growth of barley under various levels of salinity and water stress. Agric. Water Manage. 18, 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boursier P and Läuchli A 1990 Growth responses and mineral nutrient relations of salt-stressed sorghum. Crop. Sci. 30, 1226–1233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresler E 1973 Simultaneous transport of solutes and water under transient unsaturated flow conditions. Water Resour. Res. 9 975–986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell G S 1985 Soil Physics with BASIC. Elsevier, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon G E and Letey J 1992 Plant water uptake terms evaluated for soil water and solute movement models. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 32, 1876–1880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs S W and Hanks R J 1975 Model of soil salinity effects on crop growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 39, 617–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan I R 1965 Iransport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. J. Appl. Ecol. 2 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar A, Rhoades J D, Nash P and Waggoner B L 1991 Production functions relating crop yield, water quality and quantity, soil salinity and drainage volume. Agric. Water Manage. 19, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar G D, vonCaemmerer S and Berry J A 1980 A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma F S and Krieg D R 1991 Osmotic adjustment in sorghum. I. Mechanisms of diarnal osmotic potential changes. Plant Physiol. 99, 577–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1989a Test of a simple biochemical model for photosynthesis of maize and soybean leaves. Agric. For. Meteorol. 48, 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1989b Simulation of maize phenology. Agron. J. 81, 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1991 The distribution of water and nitrogen in the soilcrop system: A simulation study with validation from a winter wheat field trial. Fertil. Res. 27, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1992a Simulation of carbon dioxide and water deficit effects upon photosynthesis of soybean leaves with testing from growth chamber studies. Crop Sci. 32, 1313–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1992b Simulation of carbon dioxide and water deficit effects upon photosynthesis and transpiration of soybean canopies with testing from growth chamber studies. Crop Sci. 32, 1322–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1992c Dynamic simulation of phase changes in snowpacks and soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 1051–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1993a Simulation model of soil compaction and root growth I. Model development. Plant and Soil 150, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1993b Simulation model of soil compaction and root growth. II. Model testing. Plant and Soil 150, 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F 1994 Simulation of competition between barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) under different managements and climates. Ecol. Model. 71, 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Peters D E Larson E M and Huck M G 1989 Simulation of canopy photosynthesis in maize and soybean. Agric. For. Meteorol. 48, 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Izaurralde R C and Chanasyk D S 1990 Soil temperature under conventional and minimum tillage: Simulation and experimental verification. Can. J. Soil Sci. 70, 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F and baldocchi D D 1992 Energy transfer over crop canopies: simulation and experimental verification. Agric. For. Meteorol. 61, 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F and Hesketh J D 1992 Canopy structure of maize (Zea mays L.) at different populations: simulation and experimental verification. Biotronics 21, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Juma N G and McGill W B 1993a Simulation of carbon and nitrogen transformations in soils. I. Mineralization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 1317–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Juma N G and McGill W B 1993b Simulation of carbon and nitrogen transformations in soils. II. Microbial biomass and metabolic products. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 1331–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Rochette P and Desjardins R L 1993c Energy exchange and water use efficiency of crops in the field: Validation of a simulation model. Agron. J. 85, 916–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant R F, Izaurralde R C and Chanasyk D S 1995 Soil temperature under different surface managements: testing a simulation model. Agric. For. Meteorol. (In press).

  • Grashoff C and Verkerke D R 1991 Effect of pattern of water supply on Vicia faba L. 3. Plant water relations, expansive growth and stomatal reactions. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 39, 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R E and Corey R B 1971 Calculation of hydraulic conductivity: a further evaluation of some predictive methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 35, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen H H and Chang C 1987 Cation nutrition of barley as influenced by soil solution composition in a saline soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 67, 619–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B, Taylor H M, Huck M G and Fiscus E L 1973 Water relations and growth of cotton in drying soil. Agron. J. 65, 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper B, Rickman R W and Taylor H M 1983 Farm management and the function of field crop root systems. Agric. Water Manage. 7, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letey J, Kemper W D and Noonan L 1969 The effect of osmotic pressure gradients on water movement in unsaturated soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 33, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal B L, Oster J D and Tatcher J T 1970 Calculation of electrical conductivity from solution composition data as an aid to in situ estimation of soil salinity. Soil Sci. 110, 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimah M N and Hanks R J 1973 Model for estimating soil water, plant and atmospheric interrelations. I: Description and sensitivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 522–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney T G, Bassuk N L and Whitlow T H 1991 Osmotic adjustment and solute constituents in leaves and roots of water-stressed cherry (Prunus) trees. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 116, 684–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid J B and Huck M G 1990 Diurnal variation of crop hydraulic resistance: a new analysis. Agron. J. 82, 827–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins C W, Wagenet R J and Jurinak J J 1980a A combined salt transport-chemical equilibrium model for calcareous and gypsiferous soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 1191–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins C W, Jurinak J J and Wagenet R J 1980b Calculating cation exchange in a salt transport model. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 1195–1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliendra N Z and Meinzer F C 1991 Symplast volume, turgor, stomatal conductance, and growth in relation to osmotic and elastic adjustment in droughted sugarcane. J. Exp. Bot. 42. 1251–1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhalter U and Oertli J J 1991 Transpiration/biomass ratio for carrots as affected by salinity, nutrient supply and soil aeration. Plant and Soil 135, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J I, Danielson R E, Hanks R J, Jackson E B, Hagan R M, Pruitt W O, Franklin W T and Riley J P 1977 Optimizing crop production through control of water and salinity levels in the soil. Utah Water Lab. PRW 6–161–1.

  • Tan W, Blake T J and Boyle T J B 1992 Drought tolerance in faster- and slower-growing black spruce (Picea mariana) progenies. II: osmotic adjustment and changes of soluble carbohydrates and amino acids under osmotic stress. Physiol. Plant. 85, 645–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA 1954 Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Handbook 60. Wash. D.C.

  • VanBavel C H M and Hillel D I 1976 Calculating potential and actual evaporation from a bare soil surface by simulation of concurrent flow of water and beat. Agric. Meteorol. 17, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanGenuchten M Th 1987 A numerical model for water and solute movement in and below the root zone. Res. Rep. 121. U.S. Salinity Lab. USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanHoorn J W, Katerji N, Hamdy A and Mastrorilli M 1993 Effect of saline water on soil salinity and on water stress, growth and yield of wheat and potatoes. Agric. Water Manage. 23, 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong S C, Cowan I R and Farquhar G D 1979 Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282, 424–426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, R.F. Salinity, water use and yield of maize: Testing of the mathematical model ecosys . Plant Soil 172, 309–322 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011333

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011333

Key words

Navigation