Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of minirhizotron techniques for estimating root length density in soils of different bulk densities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flexible- and rigid-walled minirhizotron techniques were compared for estimating root length density of 14- to 28-day-old Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and spring whet (Triticum aestivum L.) plants in soil boxes under controlled environment conditions at three soil bulk densities (1.3, 1.5 and 1.7 g cm−3). The flexible-tube system consisted of bicycle inner tubes inflated inside augered access holes and removed only when measurements were taken. Rigid tubes were constructed of extruded polybutyrate plastic. In both cases tubes were oriented horizontally. Despite similar root densities for wheat and beans based on measurements obtained from soil cores, root densities estimated from both types of minirhizotron were higher in bean than in wheat in uncompacted soil. Estimates of root density by the flexible tube minirhizotron were more closely correlated with soil core image analysis estimates than were those by the rigid minirhizotron system. At high soil bulk density, rigid tube measurements consistently overestimated actual rooting density of both wheat and bean. The relationship between estimated and actual rooting densities in the case of flexible tube measurements was not significantly influenced by soil bulk density. These findings were consistent with the theory that preferential root growth is induced by gaps at the soil-observation tube interface, inherent in the rigid tube technique, and was accentuated under conditions of high soil strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bragg, P L, Govi, G and Cannell, R Q 1983 A comparison of methods, including angled and vertical minirhizotrons, for studying root growth and distribution in a spring oat crop. Plant and Soil 73, 435–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W, Coleman, D C and Box, J EJr 1990 Root dynamics, production and distribution in agroecosystems on the Georgia Piedmont using minirhizotrons. J. Appl. Ecol. 27, 592–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijsman, A J, Floris, J, VanNoordwijk, M and Brouwer, G 1991 An inflatable minirhizotron system for root observations with improved soil/tube contact. Plant and Soil 134, 261–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greacen, E L 1986 Root response to soil mechanical properties. Transactions of the 13th Congress of the ISSS, Hamburg, Vol 5, pp 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeraman D A, Crown P H and Juma N J 1992 A technique for quantification of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) root dynamics using digital image analysis. Proceedings, 29th Annual Alberta Soils Workshop, Lethbridge, Al, pp 234–245.

  • Hummel, J W, Levan, M A and Sudduth, K A 1989 Minirhizotron installation in heavy soils. Transactions of the ASAE 32, 770–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Materechera, S A, Dexter, A R and Alston, A M 1991 Penetration of very strong soils by seedlings roots of different plant species. Plant and Soil 135, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, S D, Doering, E J and Reichman, G A 1987 Application of a minirhizotron with flexible, pressurized walls to a study of corn root growth. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H MTaylor. pp 31–143. ASA Special Publication no. 50, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, S 1992 Pressurized-wall minirhizotron for field observation of root growth dynamics. Agron. J. 84, 755–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, R K, Dexter, A R and Alston, A M 1986 Maximum axial and radial growth pressures of plant roots. Plant and Soil 95, 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C J, Carr, M K V, Jarvis, N J, Puplampu, B O and Lee, V H 1991 An evaluation of the minirhizotron technique for estimating root distribution in potatoes. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 116, 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R G D and Torrie, J H 1960 Principles and Procedures of Statistics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York. 481 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H M 1987 Minirhizotron observation tubes: methods and applications for measuring rhizosphere dynamics. ASA Special Publication no. 50, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, D R 1987 Conversion of minirhizotron-root intersections to root length density. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H MTaylor. pp 51–65. ASA Special Publication no. 50, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanNoordwijk, M, deJager, A and Floris, J 1985 A new dimension to observation in minirhizotrons: A stereoscopic view on root photographs. Plant and Soil 86, 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, J and Groenwold, J 1987 The relation between root growth along observation tubes and in bulk soil. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H MTaylor. pp 39–49. ASA Special Publication no. 50, Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely and Dexter, A R 1981 Elastic response of the roots of field crops. Physiol. Plant. 51, 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volkmar, K.M. A comparison of minirhizotron techniques for estimating root length density in soils of different bulk densities. Plant Soil 157, 239–245 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011052

Key words

Navigation