Abstract
Proteocephalus paraguayensis, considered by Freze (1965) as a species inquirenda, is redescribed and figured. When compared with other members of the Proteocephalidea, the species shows the following morpho-anatomical characters: the vitelline follicles in a dorsal position, attached to the internal longitudinal musculature and extending into both the cortex and medulla; a characteristic formation of the uterus; the uterine stem in a cortical position and uterine branches in a medullary position; a proximal vaginal sphincter; a very elongate cirrus; and very large Mehlis' glands. The specific status of Proteocephalus paraguayensis is confirmed. Our specimens were taken from Hydrodynastes gigas (the host according to Rudin was “Coluber sp.”). Even though the species differs significantly from other proteocephalideans, its systematic and phylogenetic position is not yet clearly demonstrated, and it is decided to refrain from attributing it to a new genus.
Resumen
Redescripción de Proteocephalus paraguayensis (Rudin, 1917) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parásito de Hydrodynastes gigas (Dum., Bibr. & Dum., 1854) de Paraguay. Se describe esta especie notable, considerada por Freze (1965) como species inquirenda. Si comparamos esta especie con otras especies de Proteocephalidea, veremos que ella presenta caracteres anatomo-morfológicos propios. Esta especie se caracteriza por: vitelógenos de posición dorsal, adosados a la musculatura interna longitudinal, desbordando en parte sobre el córtex y la médula; formación particular del útero; posición cortical del tronco uterino y medular de los divertículos uterinos; esfínter vaginal proximal; cirro muy alargado; glándula de Mehlis muy desarrollada. Consideramos P. paraguayensis como una especie válida y presumimos que el huesped-tipo es Hydrodynastes gigas (Dum., Bibr. & Dum., 1854). A pesar de las características que posee P. paraguayensis, pensamos que no es oportuno clasificar esta especie en un nuevo género monotípico.
Similar content being viewed by others
Références
Brooks, D.R. (1978) Systematic Status of Proteocephalid Cestodes from Reptiles and Amphibians in North America with Descriptions of Three New Species. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 45, 1–28.
Burt, D.R.R. (1937) Two new Reptilian Cestodes of the genus Proteocephalus (Ophiotaenia). Ceylon Journal of Science, (Sect. B), 20, 157–179.
deChambrier, A. (1987) Vaucheriella bicheti, n. gen., n. sp. (Cestoda: Monticellidae, Zygobothriinae) parasite de Tropidophis cf. taczanowskyi (Steindachner, 1880) (Serpentes: Tropidophidae) des Andes équatoriennes. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 94, 829–840.
deChambrier, A. (1988) Crepidobothrium garzonii n. sp. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite de Bothrops alternatus Dum. Bibr. & Dum. 1854 (Serpentes: Viperidae) au Paraguay. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 95, 1163–1170.
deChambrier, A. (1989a) Révision du genre Crepidobothrium Monticelli, 1900 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite d'Ophidiens néotropicaux. I. C. gerrardii (Baird, 1860) et C. viperis (Beddard, 1913). Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 96, 191–217.
deChambrier, A. (1989b) Révision du genre Crepidobothrium Monticelli, 1900 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite d'Ophidiens néotropicaux. II. C. dollfusi Freze, 1965, C. lachesidis (MacCallum, 1921) et conclusions. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 96, 345–380.
Freze, V.I. (1965) Essentials of cestodology. Vol. V. Proteocephalata in fish, amphibians and reptiles. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo “Nauka”, 538 pp. (Israel Program of Scientific Translations, Jerusalem. 1969.), Cat. No. 1853, v+597 pp.
Harwood, P.D. (1933) The helminths parasitic in a Water Mocassin (snake) with a discussion of the characters of the Proteocephalidae. Parasitology, 25, 130–142.
LaRue, G. (1911) A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 38, 473–482.
Lopez-Neyra, C.R. & Diaz-Ungria, C. (1958) Cestodes de Venezuela. V. Cestodes de Vertebrados venezolanos (2a nota). Memorias de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales “La Salle”, 23, 1–41.
Locquin, M. et Langeron, M. (1978) Manuel de microscopie, Masson: Paris, New York, Barcelone, Milan, 352 pp.
Meggitt, F.J. (1927) Remarks on the Cestode Families Monticellidae and Ichthyotaeniidae. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 21, 69–87.
Rego, A.A. (1967) Sôbres alguns cestódeos de répteis. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 27, 181–187.
Rego, A.A. (1984) Proteocephalidea from amazonian freshwater fishes: new systematic arrangement for the species described by Woodland as Anthobothrium (Tetraphyllidea). Acta Amazonica, 14, 86–94.
Rego, A.A. (1985) Proteocephalidea from amazonian freshwater fishes: new systematic arrangement for the species described by Woodland as Anthobothrium (Tetraphyllidea). Parasitologia al Dia, 9, 4–9.
Rudin, E. (1917) Die Ichthyotaenien der Reptilien. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 25, 179–381.
Schmidt, G.D. (1986) Handbook of tapeworm identification. Boca Raton, Florida: C.R.C. Press Inc., 675 pp.
Vaucher, Cl. (1971) Les Cestodes parasites des Soricidés d'Europe. Etude anatomique, révision taxonomique et biologique. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 78, 1–113.
Woodland, W.N.F. (1934) On six new cestodes from Amazon fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 33–44.
Woodland, W.N.F. (1935) Some more remarkable cestodes from Amazon siluroid fish. Parasitology, 27, 207–225.
Yamaguti, S. (1938) Studies of the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 22. Two new species of frog cestodes. Japanese Journal of Zoology, 7, 553–558.
Yamaguti, S. (1959) Systema helminthum. II. The cestodes of vertebrates. New York and London: Interscience Publishers. 860 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Chambrier, A. Redescription de Proteocephalus paraguayensis (Rudin, 1917) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) parasite de Hydrodynastes gigas (Dum., Bibr. & Dum., 1854) du Paraguay. Syst Parasitol 16, 85–97 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009608
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00009608