Skip to main content
Log in

Selective effects of phytoplankton entrainment at the Surry Power Plant, James River, Virginia

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loss of cryptophyte cells entrained in the Surry Power Plant cooling water was significantly correlated with discharge water temperature in the range 27.2–37.5 °C. Entrained Skeletonema costatum and benthic diatom populations experienced losses of 25–80% in the summer, but correlations between % loss and discharge temperature were insignificant. Cropping by benthic filter feeders in the intake and discharge canals could account for the summer removal of diatoms. Shortening of entrained S. costatum chains was detected in both winter and summer, indicating a mechanical effect of turbulence.

Benthic diatoms were vulnerable to entrainment only during daylight hours, when they migrated to the sediment surface at low tide. Skeletonema costatum was most vulnerable in the summer, when elevated salinities permitted it to range upstream to the intake area. Cryptophyte populations peaked in the summer when entrainment loss was greatest.

The composition of the entrained phytoplankton community was altered by the species specific interactions of factors affecting vulnerability and entrainment loss. At Surry the discharged cooling water mixes rapidly with the main stem James River, and the selective effects of entrainment are not detectable in phytoplankton samples taken beyond the immediate discharge zone. More persistent modifications of the phytoplankton could be expected at sites where power plants discharge into creeks or embayments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briand, F. J.-P., 1975. Effects of power-plant cooling systems on marine phytoplankton. Mar. Biol. 33: 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. S., 1974. Phytoplankton entrainment studies at the Indian River Estuary, Delaware. In: Jensen, L. D. (ed.). Second Workshop on Entrainment and Intake Screening. Report 15. The John Hopkins University Department of Oceanography and Environmental Engineering, Baltimore: 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloern, J. E., 1977. Effects of light intensity and temperature on Cryptomonas ovata (Cryptophyceae) growth and nutrient uptake rates. J. Phycol. 13: 389–395.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen, R. W., Fahmy, F. K., Seepersad, B. & Hayton, A. M., 1978. Impacts of three types of power generating discharge systems on entrained plankton. In: Jensen, L. D. (ed.). Fourth National Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement. Ecological Analysts, Melville, N.Y.: 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltringham, S. K., 1971. Life in Mud and Sand. English University Press, Lond., 218 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C. S. & Parker, G. C., 1976. Thermal effects of the Surry Nuclear Power Plant on the James River, Virginia. 4. Results of monitoring physical parameters. Special Report in Applied Marine Science and Ocean Engineering 109. Virginia Inst. Mar. Sc., Gloucester Point, Va., 114 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemer, D. & Sherk, J. A., Jr., 1977. The effects of steam electric station operation on entrained phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia 55: 33–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gammon, J. R., 1976. Measurement of entrainment and predictions of impact on the Wabash and Ohio Rivers. In: Jensen, L. D. (ed.). Third National Workshop on Entrainment and Impingement. Ecological Analysts, Melville, N.Y.: 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, J. C. & Quinby, H. L., 1979. Phytoplankton recovery after power plant entrainment. J. Wat. Pollut. Cont. Fed. 51: 1816–1823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasle, G. R., 1978. Using the inverted microscope. In: Sournia, A. (ed.).Phytoplankton Manual. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology 6. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Paris: 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R. A., Goodwin, P. A. & Sutton,C. E.,1980. Ecological study of the tidal segment of the James River encompassing Hog Point (site of the Surry Nuclear Power Station). Special Scientific Report 101. Virginia Inst. Mar. Sc. Gloucester Point, Va., 414 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, H. G., 1966. The distribution of phytoplankton along a 140 mile transect in the Chesapeake Bay. Virginia J. Sci. 17: 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountford, K., Mullen, R. S. & Shippen, R. S., 1974. Laboratory simulation of power plant effects: Response of some estuarine phytoplankters to time temperature combinations. In: Jensen, L. D. (ed.). Second Workshop on Entrainment and Intake Screening. Report 15. The Johns Hopkins University Department of Oceanography and Environmental Engineering, Baltimore: 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulford, R. A., 1974. Morgantown entrainment. Part IV. Phytoplankton taxonomic studies. In: Jensen, L. D. (ed.). Second Workshop on Entrainment and Intake Screening. Report 15. The Johns Hopkins University Department of Oceanography and Environmental Engineering, Baltimore: 169–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., 1979. Particle size selectivity in Modiolus demissus and Balanus balanoides. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 157: 386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard-Carpenter, Consultants, 1967. Temperature distribution in the James River estuary which will result from the discharge of waste heat from the Surry Nuclear Power Station. Appendix B, Surry Power Station Units I and 2, Applicant's Environmental Report, Dockets 50–280, 281. Virginia Electric and Power Company, Richmond, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, D. A. & Crisp, D. J., 1970. Seasonal changes in feeding rate in Balanus balanoides. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 50: 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Round, F. E. & Palmer, J. D., 1966. Persistent vertical-migration rhythms in benthic microflora. 2. Field and laboratory studies on diatoms from the banks of the River Avon. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 46: 191–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöne, H. K., 1970. Untersuchungen zur ökologischen Bedeutung des Seegangs für das Plankton mit besonderer Berück-sichtigung mariner Kieselalgen. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 55: 595–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubel, J. R., Coutant, C. C. & Woodhead, P. M. J., 1978. Thermal effects of entrainment. In: Schubel, J. R. & Marcy, B. C., Jr., (eds.). Power Plant Entrainment, a Biological Assessment, Academic Press, N.Y.: 19–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A., Brooks, A. S. & Jensen, L. D., 1974.Effects of condenser entrainment on algal photosynthesis at Mid-Atlantic power plants. In: Jensen, L. D. (ed.). Second Workshop on Entrainment and Intake Screening. Report 15. The Johns Hopkins University Department of Oceanography and Environmental Engineering, Baltimore: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southward, A. J., 1955. Feeding of barnacles. Nature175: 1124–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. J. & Torrie, J. H., 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 481 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warinner, J. E. & Brehmer, M. L., 1966. The effects of thermal effluents on marine organims. Air Wat. Pollut. int. J. 10: 277–289.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, M. O. & Ward, C. H., 1978. Primary productivity: analysis of variance in a thermally enriched aquatic system. In: Thorp, J. H. & Gibbons, J. W. (eds.). Energy and Environmental Stress in Aquatic Systems. DOE Symp. Ser. 48. U.S. Dept. Energy tech. Inf. Center: 381–391.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution No. 1106, Virginia Institute of Marine Science.

Contribution No. 1106, Virginia Institute of Marine Science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jordan, R.A., Martin, P.G. & Sutton, C.E. Selective effects of phytoplankton entrainment at the Surry Power Plant, James River, Virginia. Hydrobiologia 106, 253–261 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008124

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008124

Keywords

Navigation