Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An elementary, structural analysis of river phytoplankton

  • Contributions from the workshop
  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A structural analysis of river phytoplankton has been carried out based upon published studies on 67 rivers. When available on a yearly basis to account for seasonal variability, five structural features have been chosen: species composition, species richness, species dominance, diversity and biomass (total and per taxonomic groups). Despite the high number of reported studies, most of them cover only some of the aforementioned features. As a result of the low amount of studies, tropical rivers are underepresented. No size distribution studies have been carried out on river phytoplankton. The average species richness amounts to 126, being higher in temperate rivers. Roughly one half of each flora is comprised of sporadic species. No statistically significant relationship between species richness and latitude has been found despite the fact that tropical rivers appear to house fewer species than temperate rivers. Also, one half of the support in the floras are either benthic or tychoplanktonic. Diatoms comprise the majority of species numbers in the whole data set but are substituted by desmids in tropical rivers and by green algae when benthic species are not taken into account. There appears to be lower biomass in river phytoplankton than in lakes. Diatoms are also the major taxonomic group comprising total biomass in rivers but they share clearly a lower fraction in tropical rivers. On an average basis, diatoms appear to be more dominant in rivers than in lakes. The time course of diatom dominance occurs close to the summer solstice in tropical rivers whereas is much more lagged in temperate sites. The diversity of river phytoplankton is highly scattered (0.40–4.40 bits ind−1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdin, G., 1948. Seasonal distribution of phytoplankton and sessile algae in the river Nile, Cairo. Bull. Inst. Egypte 29: 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez Cobelas, M. & C. Rojo, (in press). Factors influencing the share of planktonic diatoms in lakes. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl.

  • Antoine, S. E., 1983. Algal flora of the River Tigris, Iraq. Nova Hedwigia 37: 535–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, D. & A. Kemball, 1978. Gewässergüteverhältnisse und Phytoplanktonentwicklung im Hochrhein, Obenrhein und Neckar. Arch. Hydrobiol. 82: 166–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behre, K., 1961. Die Algenbesiedlung der Unterweser unter Berücksichtigung ihrer Zuflüsse. Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerhaven 7: 71–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, S., 1968. Hydrobiology of the Volta river and some of its tributaries before the formation of the Volta lake. Ghana J. Sci. 8: 152–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, J. L., 1956. The ecology of river algae. Bot. Rev. 22: 291–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capblancq, J. & A. Dauta, 1978. Phytoplancton et production primaire de la rivière Lot. Ann. Limnol. 14: 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. H., E. S. Kay & D. W. Park, 1968. A study on the microflora of the Han river, II. Korean J. Bot. 11: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colt jr., L. C., 1974. Some algae of the Connecticut river, New England, USA Nova Hedwigia 25: 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czernin-Chudenitz, C. W., 1966. Das Plankton der österreichischen Donau und seine Bedeutung für die Selbstreinigung. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 30: 194–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauta, A., 1975. Etude du phytoplancton du Lot. Ann. Limnol. 11: 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy, J. P., 1993. Ecology of the phytoplankton of the River Moselle: effects of disturbances on community structure and diversity. Hydrobiologia 249: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürrschmidt, M., 1980. Some ecological observations on environmental parameters, planktonic seasonal succession and biomass in Río Cruces (Prov. Valdivia), South Chile. Arch. Hydrobiol. 88: 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egborge, A. B. M., 1973. A preliminary check-list of the phytoplankton of the Oshun River, Nigeria. Freshwat. Biol. 3: 569–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egborge, A. B. M., 1974. The seasonal variation and distribution of phytoplankton in the River Oshun, Nigeria. Freshwat. Biol. 4: 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enaceanu, V., 1964. Das Donauplankton auf rumänischen Gebiet. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 27: 442–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esho, R. T. & K. Benson-Evans, 1984. Algal studies of the river Ely, South Wales, UK. I. Phytoplankton. Nova Hedwigia 40: 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gecen, M. V., 1973. Vodorosli basseina Pechori. Sostav i raspredelenie. Nauka Publ. House, Leningrad, 147 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. P., 1986. Phytoplankton ecology. Structure, function and fluctuations. Chapman & Hall, London, 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, R. T., 1965. Composition and distribution of phytoplankton communities in the upper Ohio river. Spec. Publ. Pymatuning Lab. Field Ecol. 3: 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindák, F. & O. Durkovicová, 1977. Das Phytoplankton des Donaunebenarmes bei der Wasserwerkinsel in Bratislava. Biologia, Bratislava 32: 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N. T. H. & B. A. Whitton, 1981. Phytoplankton of four rivers, the Tyne, Wear, Tees and Swale. Hydrobiologia 80: 111–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, D. R., 1986. Phytoplankton communities in Navigation Pool no. 7 of the Upper Missisippi River. Hydrobiologia 136: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq, M. F., H. A. Al-Saadi & H. A. Hameed, 1978. Phytoplankton ecology of Shatt al-Arab river at Basrah, Iraq. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 1552–1556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hustedt, F., 1959. Die Diatomeenflora der Unterweser von der Lesummündung bis Bremerhaven mit Berücksichtigung des Unterlaufs der Hunte und Geeste. Veröff. Inst. Meeresforsch. Bremerhaven 6: 13–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, G. E., 1967. A treatise on limnology, 2. Introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. J. Wiley, New York, 1115 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, A., 1982a. Peuplements algaux des rivières de Côte d'Ivoire. I — Stations de prélèvement, méthodologie, remarques sur la composition qualitative et biovolumes. Revue Hydrobiol. trop. 15: 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, A., 1982b. Peuplements algaux des rivières de Côte d'Ivoire. II — Variations saisonnières des biovolumes, de la composition et de la diversité spécifique. Revue Hydrobiol. trop. 15: 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, F. H., 1984. The dynamics of suspended algal populations in the lower Wye catchment. Wat. Res. 18: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K. T., 1974. Effect of turbidity of the water on the development of algal associations in the Tisza. Tiscia, Szeged. 9: 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K. T., 1987. Phytoplankton studies in the Szigetköz Section of the Danube during 1981–1982. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 78: 247–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofoid, C. A., 1903. The plankton of the Illinois river, 1894–1899. Bull. Illinois State Lab. Nat. Hist. 6: 95–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozova, O. M., N. I. Basharova, G. I. Kabanova, L. R. Izmestieva & T. I. Romanenko, 1982. Plankton Ust-Ilimskogo Vodochranislischa. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 132 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, J., 1993. Growth, production and losses of phytoplankton in the lowland River Spree. I. Population dynamics. J. Plankton Res. 15: 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, J., B. Nixdorf & S. Hoeg, (in press). Lake Müggelsee and the inflowing river Spree. Comparison of phytoplankton communities 1980–1990. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol.

  • Krzeczkowska-Woloszyn, L. & H. Bucka, 1969. Gony rzeki Soly na odcinku Rajcza-Parabka. Acta Hydrobiol. 11: 245–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmin, G. V., 1985. Vidovoi sostav phytoplanktona vodoj emov zoni zatoplenia Kolimskoj GES. Magadan, 42 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumsare, A. J., 1967. Hydrobiologia Daugavi. Zinatne, Riga, 185 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, T. J., 1971. Quantitative studies on the phytoplankton of the rivers Thames and Kennet at Reading. Freshwat. Biol. 1: 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayana, J. S. S., 1965. Studies on the phytoplankton of the river Ganges, Varanasi, India. Hydrobiologia 25: 119–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot, H., 1974. Das Phytoplankton im unteren Main unter dem Einfluss starker Abwasserbelastung. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 12: 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmermann, E., 1907. Das Plankton der Weser bei Bremen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 2: 393–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levadnaja, G. D., J. V. Naumenko & V. I. Ermolaev, 1986. Algologicheskie issledovanija vodojemov Zapadnoj Sibiri. Trudi V Sjezda Vsesojznogo Gidrobiologicheskogo Obshestva, Kuibishev 7: 260–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis jr., W. M., 1988. Primary production in the Orinoco river. Ecology 69: 679–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liepolt, R., 1961. Limnologische Forschungen im östterreichischen Donaustrom. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 14: 422–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Peral, T., 1987. Limnología del estuario del Guadalquivir. Incidencia de los factores del medio en la distribución y sucesión del fitoplancton. M.Sc. thesis, Sevilla, 146 + 43 pp.

  • Marshall, H. G., 1968. Plankton in James River Estuary, Virginia, III. Phytoplankton in the Lafayette and Elizabeth Rivers (Western and Eastern Branches). Castanea 33: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B., H. Balls, I. Booker, K. Manson & M. Timms, 1984. The river Bure, United Kingdom: patterns of change in chemistry and phytoplankton in a slow-flowing fertile river. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1959–1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalewajko, C., 1966. Photosynthesis and excretion in various plankton algae. Limnol. Oceanogr. 11: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochapkin, A. G., 1981. Phytoplankton Oki v 1978. Biologia vnutrennich vodojemov, Informat. Bulleten. Nauka Publ. House, Leningrad N. 49: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padisák, J., 1992. Seasonal succession of phytoplankton in a large shallow lake (Balaton, Hungary) — a dynamic approach to ecological memory, its possible role and mechanisms. J. Ecol. 80: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padisák, J., C. S. Reynolds & U. Sommer (eds.), 1993. Intermediate disturbance hypothesis in phytoplankton ecology. Hydrobiologia 249 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 81). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 199 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajak, G. & K. T. Kiss, 1990. Seasonal changes of phytoplankton in the River Vistula above and below the Goczalkowice Reservoir (southern Poland). Acta Hydrobiol. 32: 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porjadina, S. N., 1973. Algophlora reki Ural i pritokov. M. Sc. thesis, Tashkent, 33 pp.

  • Priimachenko, A. D., 1981. Phytoplankton i pervichnaja produkcia Dnepera i dneprovskich vodochranilish. Nauka dumka, Kiev, 278 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priimachenko, A. D. & O. P. Bazenova, 1990. Sovremennoje sostojanie phytoplanktona Eniseja i ego izmenenie v resultate antroponennogo vlijania. Vodnii resusrsi. N 3: 104–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, G. A. & J. F. Talling, 1958. The seasonal growth and succession of plankton algae in the White Nile. Limnol. Oceanogr. 3: 222–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, H., 1974. Limnological studies on the river Yamuna at Delhi, India. II. The dynamics of potamoplankton populations in the river Yamuna. Arch. Hydrobiol. 73: 492–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanankasina, E., 1978. Recensement et analyses du peuplement planctonique de la rivière Andriandrano-Mandraka. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 2743–2749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskina, E. E., 1968. Phytoplankton i obrastanija reki Neva i pritokov. In Zagraznenie i samoochischenie reki Nevi. Nauka Publ. House, Leningrad: 168–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S., 1984. The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 384 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S., 1987. Community organization in the freshwater plankton. In J. H. R. Gee & P. S. Giller (eds), Organization of Communities, Past and Present. Blackwell, Oxford: 297–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S., 1988. Potamoplankton: paradigms, paradoxes and prognoses. In F. E. Round (ed.), Algae and the Aquatic Environment. Biopress, Bristol: 283–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, C. S., P. A. Carling & K. J. Beven, 1991. Flow in river channels: new insights into hydraulic retention. Arch. Hydrobiol. 121: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C. H., 1938. Studies in the phytoplankton of the river Thames (1928–1932). I. Ann. Bot. 2: 539–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabater, S. & I. Munoz, 1990. Successional dynamics of the phytoplankton in the lower part of the river Ebro. J. Plankton Res. 12: 573–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, L. & E. Vásquez, 1989. Hydrochemistry and phytoplankton of a major blackwater river (Caroní) and a hydroelectric reservoir (Macagua), Venezuela. Arch. Hydrobiol. Ergebn. Limnol. 33: 303–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. H., 1990. Phytoplankton responses to eutrophication in inland waters. In I. Akatsuka (ed.), Introduction to Applied Phycology. SPB Academic, The Hague: 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, U., 1989. The role of competition for resources in phytoplankton succession. In U. Sommer (ed.) Plankton Ecology, Succession in Plankton Communities. Springer, Berlin: 57–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, C., B. Heindel, R. Tille-Backhaus & R. Klee, 1987. Phytoplanktonstudien an langsamfliessenden Gewässern: Donau und Vils. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 68: 437–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talling, J. F. & J. Rzóska, 1967. The development of plankton in relation to hydrological regime in the Blue Nile. J. Ecol. 55: 637–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifonova, I., 1973. Sostav i produccionnaja characteristica phytoplanktona reki Kemi i ozer ejo poimi. In Biologicheskie issledovanija na vnutrennich vodojemach Pribaltici. Visshaha shkola, Minsk: 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uherkovich, G., 1976. Algen aus den Flüssen Rio Negro and Rio Tapajos. Amazoniana 5: 465–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkateswarlu, V., 1969. An ecological study of the algae of the River Moosi, Hyderabad (India) with special reference to water pollution. III. The algal periodicity. Hydrobiologia 33: 533–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. B. & G. J. Schumacher, 1970. Phytoplankton of the Susquehanna river near Binghamton, New York: seasonal variations, effect of sewage effluents. J. Phycol. 6: 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. I. & D. R. Moore, 1967. Phytoplankton, seston, and dissolved organic carbon in the Little Miami River at Cincinnati, Ohio. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharias, O., 1898. Das Potamoplankton. Zool. Anz. 550: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Microbiología, Univ. Valencia, Burjassot, E-46100, Valencia, Spain

    C. Rojo

  2. Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales (CSIC), Serrano 115 dpdo., E-28006, Madrid, Spain

    M. Alvarez Cobelas & M. Arauzo

Authors
  1. C. Rojo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Alvarez Cobelas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Arauzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rojo, C., Cobelas, M.A. & Arauzo, M. An elementary, structural analysis of river phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia 289, 43–55 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007407

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00007407

Key words

Search

Navigation