Skip to main content
Log in

Escape tactics used by bluegills and fathead minnows to avoid predation by tiger muskellunge

  • Published:
Environmental Biology of Fishes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Synopsis

To explain why esocids prefer cylindrical, soft-rayed prey over compressed, spiny-rayed prey, we quantified behavioral interaction between tiger muskellunge (F1 hybrid of male northern pike Esox lucius and female muskellunge E. masguinongy) and fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus). Tiger muskellunge required four times as many strikes and longer pursuits to capture bluegills than fathead minnows. Tiger muskellunge attacked each prey species differently; fathead minnows were grasped at midbody and bluegills were attacked in the caudal area. Each prey species exhibited different escape tactics. Fathead minnows remained in open water and consistently schooled; bluegills dispersed throughout the tank and sought cover by moving to corners and edges. Due to their antipredatory behavior (dispersing, cover seeking, and remaining motionless) and morphology (deep body and spines), bluegills were less susceptible to capture by tiger muskellunge than were fathead minnows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References cited

  • Alexander, R. McN. 1967. Functional design in fishes. Hutchinson, London. 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyerle, G. B. & J. E. Williams. 1968. Some observations of food selectivity by northern pike in aquaria. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 97: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillen, A. L., R. A. Stein & R. F. Carline. 1981. Predation by pellet-reared tiger muskellunge on bluegills and minnows in experimental systems. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 110: 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, D. R. 1978. Intensive culture of esocids: the current state of the art. Amer. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 11: 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. & D. A. Wolfe. 1973. Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 503 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland, H. C. 1974. Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and maneuverability. J. Theor. Biol. 47: 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. 1978. Evaluation of esocid stocking program in Wisconsin. Amer. Fish. Soc. Spec. Publ. 11: 278–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A. & D. Webb. 1966. Mouth and body form relative to feeding ecology in the fish fauna of a small lake, Lake Opinicon, Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 23: 1845–1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauck, W. L. & D. W. Coble. 1970. Vulnerability of some fishes to northern pike (Esox lucius) predation. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 28: 957–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. A., R. F. Carline & R. S. Hayward. 1981. Evaluation of fish management techniques: evaluation of stocking tiger muskies in Ohio lakes. Ohio Federal Aid Project F-57-R. Ohio Division of Wildlife, Columbus, Ohio. 41 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weithman, A. S. & R. O. Anderson. 1977. Survival, growth, and prey of Esocidae in experimental systems. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 106: 424–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. W. 1978. Fast-start performance and body form in seven species of teleost fish. J. Exp. Biol. 74: 211–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. & J. M. Skadsen. 1980. Strike tactics of Esox. Can. J. Zool. 58: 1462–1469.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moody, R.C., Helland, J.M. & Stein, R.A. Escape tactics used by bluegills and fathead minnows to avoid predation by tiger muskellunge. Environ Biol Fish 8, 61–65 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00004947

Keywords

Navigation