Synopsis
All living species occupy an ecological niche, and are positioned within a trophic hierarchy. Extinct organisms presumably held similar behavioral and coevolutionary characteristics in the past, and were susceptible to the same kinds of natural ecological pressures operating today. Paleoecological investigations are limited by the incompleteness of the fossil record, and particularly by a lack of behavioral data that are so fundamental to ecological studies of living communities and habitats. Opportunities to examine the coevolutionary structure of ancient communities from empirical data are extremely rare. One such opportunity is provided by the Lower Cretaceous Santana Formation of north-eastern Brazil, a series of richly fossiliferous strata approximately 110 million years old. Many fossil fishes from the Santana Formation contain identifiable prey, including decapod crustaceans and fishes. A trophic hierarchy of these organisms is reconstructed here, and their ecological relationships are discussed. Comparison is made with a similar fish fauna from the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestone of Germany. Low-level, intermediate and high-level predators are identified in each fauna. Predator-prey relationships in the Santana fauna are strongly hierarchical, and are more focussed at the intermediate predator level than in Solnhofen. Comparison with a model of predator-prey relationships between fishes and benthic fauna of the Baltic Sea (which like the Araripe Basin represents a semi-enclosed environment) suggests that heavy predation on teleosts such asRhacolepis, occupying an intermediate trophic level, may have permitted benthic decapods to proliferate and exclude other benthic organisms. Less intense predation on fishes at the intermediate trophic level would allow their numbers to increase, thereby increasing the intensity of predation on the benthos at the base of the trophic hierarchy.
References cited
Barthel, K. W. 1978. Fossilien aus Solnhofen, Ein Blick in die Erdgeschichte. Ott, Thun. 393 pp.
Bond, C. 1979. Biology of fishes. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. 514 pp.
Boucot, A.J. 1990. Evolutionary paleobiology of behavior and coevolution. Elsevier, London. 725 pp.
Cressey, R. & G. Boxshall. 1989.Kabatarina pattersoni, a fossil parasitic copepod (Dichelesthiidae) from a Lower Cretaceous fish. Micropalaeontology 35: 150–167.
Gayet, M. 1989. Note preliminaire sur le material paleoichthyologique eocretacique du Rio Benito (sud de Bata, Guinee Equatoriale). Bull. Mus. nat. Hist. nat., Paris Ser 411(C): 2–31.
Grande, L. 1980. Paleontology of the Green River Formation. Geol. Surv. Wyoming, Bull. 63. 1–331.
Lauder, G.V. 1983. Food capture. pp. 280–311. In: P.W. Webb & D. Weihs (ed.) Fish Biomechanics Praeger, New York.
Lauder, G.V. & K.F. Liem. 1981. Prey capture inLuciocephalus pulcher: implications for models of jaw protrusion in teleost fishes. Env. Biol. Fish. 6: 257–268.
Maisey, J.G. 1991. Santana fossils: an illustrated atlas. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 459 pp.
Martins-Neto, R.G. 1987. Primeiro registro de decápode na Formação Santana, bacia do Araripe (Cretáceo Inferior), Brasil. Cincia e Cultura 39: 406–410.
Martins-Neto, R.G. & A.W.A. Kellner. 1988. Premeiro registro de pena na Formação Santana (Cretáceo Inferior), Bacia do Araripe, Nordeste do Brasil. An. Acad. brasil. Cienc. 60: 61–67.
Martins-Neto, R.G. & S. Mezzalira. 1991. Descrição de novos crustáceous (Caridae) da Formação Santana, Cretáceo Inferior do Nordeste do Brasil. An. Acad. brasil. Cienc. 63: 155–160.
Mattila, J. 1992. Can fish regulate benthic communities on shallow soft bottoms in the Baltic Sea? The role of perch, ruffe and roach. Acta Acad. Aboensis, Ser. B, Mathematika et physica 52: 1–37.
Noakes, D.L.G. 1993. Discussion: predators, predation, and community structure: patterns and processes. pp. 133–140. In: H. Hawanabe, J.E. Cohen & K. Iwasaki (ed.) Mutualism, and Community Organization, Behavioural, Theoretical, and Food-Web Approaches, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Pons, D., P.Y. Berthou & D.A. Campos.1990. Quelques observations sur la palynologie de l'Aptien superieur et de l'Albien du Bassin d'Araripe. pp. 241–252. In: D.A. Campos, M.S.S. Viana, P.M. Brito & G. Beurlen (ed.) I Simposio Sobre a Bacia do Araripe e Bacias Interiores do Nordeste, DNPM.
Remane, A. 1951. Die Besiedlung des Sandbodens im Meere and die Bedeutung der Lebensform-Typen für die Ökologie. Verh. deutsch. zool. Ges., Wilhelmshaven 1951: 327–359.
Schafer, W. 1972. Ecology and paleoecology of marine environments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. 568 pp.
Viohl, G. 1990. Piscivorous fishes of the Solnhofen lithographic limestone. pp. 287–303. In: A.J. Boucot (ed.) Evolutionary Paleobiology of Behavior and Coevolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Wilby, P.R. & D.M. Martill. 1992. Fossil fish stomachs: a microenvironment for exceptional preservation. Hist. Biol. 6: 25–36.
Williams, M.E. 1990. Feeding behavior in Cleveland Shale fishes. pp. 273–287. In: A.J. Boucot (ed.) Evolutionary Paleobiology of Behavior and Coevolution, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Wilson, M. 1987. Predation as a source of fish fossils in Eocene lake sediments. Palaios 2: 497–504.
Zangerl, R. & E.S. Richardson. 1963. The paleoecological history of two Pennsylvanian black shales. Fieldiana, Geol. Mem. 4: 1–352.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maisey, J.G. Predator-prey relationships and trophic level reconstruction in a fossil fish community. Environ Biol Fish 40, 1–22 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002179
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002179