Skip to main content
Log in

Variability of entrainment of cohesive sediments in freshwater

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimates of sediment entrainment are required for models of particle transport in lakes and estuaries but are difficult to make because of the multiplicity of factors affecting cohesiveness of surficial sediments. We present results of sediment resuspension studies performed in an annular flume calibrated with laser-Doppler velocimetry. In our experiments, using sediments collected from two sites in the R. Raisin which flows into L. Erie and from one site in the western basin of L. Erie near the mouth of the R. Raisin, we applied shear stresses at the sediment-water interface in steps from 2 to 12 dyne/cm2. Percent water content at the surface of the sediments was either 77 or 74%, and trials were run with and without oxygenating the water overlying the sediments. Entrainment rates as a function of shear stress at the sediment-water interface were best described by a power-law relationship. All but 14% of the variability in the power law expression was due to shear stress and percent water content; the variability not accounted for was due to differences in particle size distributions, chemical properties, and biological activity in the sediments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bale AJ & Morris AW (1987) In situ measurement of particle size in estuarine waters. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 24: 253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff JW & Yoon SC (1984) On the use of an annulus to study mixed-layer entrainment. J. Fluid Mech. 142: 97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Frostick Lynne E & McCave IN (1979) Seasonal shifts of sediment within an estuary mediated by algal growth. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 9: 569–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda MK (1978) The entrainment of cohesive sediments in freshwater. (Ph.D. thesis, Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, Ohio)

  • Fukuda MK & Lick W (1980) The entrainment of cohesive sediments in freshwater. J. Geophys. Res. 85: 2813–2824

    Google Scholar 

  • Gust G (1976) Observations on turbulent drag reduction in a dilute suspension of clay in seawater. J. Fluid Mech. 75: 29–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland AF, Zingmark RG & Dean JM (1974) Quantitative evidence concerning the stabilization of sediments by marine benthic diatoms. Mar. Biol. 27: 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk JTO (1985) Effects of suspensoids (turbidity) on penetration of solar radiation in aquatic ecosystems. Hydrobiologia 125: 195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Krone RB (1983) Cohesive sediment properties and transport processes. In: Shen, Hung Tao (Ed) Proc. Conf. Frontiers in Hydraulic Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. ASCE, NY (pp 66–78)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle JW & Mofjeld HO (1987) Do critical stresses for incipient motion and erosion really exist? J. Hydraul. Eng. 113: 370–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle JW, Mofjeld HO & Baker ET (1984) An in situ erosion rate for a fine-grained marine sediment. J. Geophys. Res. 89: 6543–6552

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee DY, Lick W & Kang SW (1981) The entrainment and deposition of fine-grained sediments in Lake Erie. J. Great Lakes Res. 7: 264–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman A (1979) Geochemical Processes. Water and Sediment Environments. John Wiley and Sons, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lick W & Kang SW (1987) Entrainment of sediments and dredged materials in shallow lake waters. J. Great Lakes Research 13: 619–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta AJ, Parchure TM, Dixit JG & Ariathurai R (1982) Resuspension potential of deposited cohesive sediment beds. In Kennedy VS (Eds) Estuarine Comparisons. (pp591–609), Academic Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell ARM, Jumars PA & Eckman JE (1981) Effects of biological activity on the entrainment of marine sediments. Mar. Geol. 42: 133–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell ARM & Jumars PA (1987) Flumes: Theoretical and experimental considerations for simulation of benthic environments. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 25: 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Melack JM (1985) Interactions of detrital particulates and plankton. Hydrobiologia 125: 209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH & Kenney DR (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Am. Soc. Agronomy and Soil Science Soc. of America. Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul JF, Kasprzyk R & Lick W (1982) Turbidity in the western basin of Lake Erie. J. Geophys. Res. 87: 5779–5784

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting H (1968) Boundary-Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng YP & Lich W (1979) The transport and resuspension of sediments in a shallow lake. J. Geophys. Res. 84: 1809–1826

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai CH & Lick W (1985) Entrainment of Long Island South Sediments. A report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Dec. 1985

  • Weiner BB (1973) Particle and droplet sizing using Fraunhofer diffraction. In: Barth HG (Ed) Modern Methods of Particle Size Analysis (pp135–172) Wiley Interscience, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacIntyre, S., Lick, W. & Han Tsai, C.H.T. Variability of entrainment of cohesive sediments in freshwater. Biogeochemistry 9, 187–209 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000598

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000598

Key words

Navigation