Skip to main content

Adaptivity and Creativity in the Arts: The Nexus and Affordances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptivity as a Transformative Disposition

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

Abstract

This chapter examines the changes that take place in the learning culture of a school through the adoption and implementation of an arts-anchored curriculum, in an effort to infuse creativity into the education system. The first part of the chapter illustrates the role that creativity and adaptive expertise play in the current social and economic climate where meaning-making from multiple disciplines, working with novel situations, and life-wide and lifelong learning are valued. At the same time, the central role that creativity plays in shaping expertise, and the ways that they can be incorporated into the current education system are elucidated. The case study of a specialised school which strives to develop a system that caters to creatively inclined learners and budding artists is then featured. The way that the school’s leaders, teachers, and learners have deliberately centred their educational interactions through a curriculum that features multiple links between the academic and arts disciplines is then explained. Rather than casting the learning processes in the shadow, this section elaborates on how the school strives to place the learning process at the centre of the educational process. This chapter also points out the contextual, social, and cultural leverages that allow its learners to acquire flexible and adaptive understandings of subjects.The authors then argue that while creativity is necessary, it is not a sufficient condition for schools, and that there needs to be a deeper appreciation of the emergent and unstable nature of adaptivity to ensure that this culture of learning is sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Classes in the school are deliberately set up for students from all four art forms.

  2. 2.

    Much of the curriculum used in mainstream secondary schools is created by the Curriculum Planning and Development Division of the Ministry of Education in Singapore.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: The componential conceptualisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1990). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2011). Teaching for creativity with disciplined improvisation. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Structure and improvisation in creative teaching (pp. 94–109). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Peat, P. D. (1989). Science, order and creativity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in Mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498. doi:10.3102/00028312026004473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How experts differ from novices. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Stevens, R., Kuhl, P., Schwartz, D., Bell, P., et al. (2006). Learning theories and education: Toward a decade of synergy. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J., & Normore, A. (2010). Educational leadership and globalization: Literacy for a glocal perspective. Educational Policy, 24(1), 52–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canton, J. (2006). The extreme future: The top trends that will reshape the world in the next 20 years. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, H. T. M., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V. M., & Brophy, S. (2006). Adaptive expertise: Theory, methods, findings and emerging issues. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, T., Burnard, P., & Craft, A. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the early years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 108–119. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2006.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, S. (2001, November 27). Education set for major change. The Straits Times, p. H7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efland, A. D. (2002). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, E. B. (Ed.). (1999). Champions of change: The impact of the arts on learning. Washington, DC: The Arts Education Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadsden, V. L. (2008). The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32(29), 29–61. doi:10.3102/0091732X07309691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1999). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. (2012). Fourth way in action? The evolution of Singapore education system. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11, 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gott, S., Hall, P., Pokorny, A., Dibble, E., & Glaser, R. (1992). A naturalist study of transfer: Adaptive expertise in technical domains. In D. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 258–288). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (2008). Education and the arts: The windows of imagination. LEARNing Landscapes, 2(1), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1984). Two courses of expertise. In Research and clinical centre for child development annual report (pp. 27–36). Hokkaido, Japan: Hokkaido University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. A. H. Stevenson & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262–272). New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, D., Lim, K. Y., Chen, V. D.-T., & Koh, T. S. (2008). Leveraging online communities in fostering adaptive schools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 373–386. doi:10.1007/s11412-008-9051-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 399–414. doi:10.1080/03057640600866015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kublin, K. S., Wetherby, A. M., Crais, E. R., & Prizant, B. M. (1989). Prelinguistic dynamic assessment: A transactional perspective. In A. M. Wetherby, S. F. Warren, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Transitions in prelinguistic communication (pp. 285–312). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R., & Nicoll, K. (2006). Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loi, D., & Dillion, P. (2006). Adaptive educational environments as creative spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Information and the Arts. (2000). Renaissance city plan I: Culture and arts in Renaissance Singapore. Singapore: National Heritage Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Information and the Arts. (2005). Renaissance city report II: City 2.0. Singapore: National Heritage Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Information and the Arts. (2008). Renaissance city plan III: Heritage development plan. Singapore: National Heritage Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Information Communications and the Arts, Singapore. (2004). Report of the committee on specialised arts school. Singapore: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, V. (2004). Creativity: The antidote to the argument culture. In M. Fryer (Ed.), Creativity and cultural diversity (pp. 45–51). Leeds, UK: The Creativity Centre Educational Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. (2004). Art and integrated curriculum. In E. W. Eisner & M. D. Day (Eds.), Handbook of research and policy in art education (pp. 775–794). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2005). Teaching with the flow: Fixity and fluidity in education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 25(1), 29–43. doi:10.1080/02188790500032491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1993). The connected curriculum. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). The science and art of transfer. In A. L. Coata, J. Bellanca, & R. Forgarty (Eds.), If minds matter: A foreword to the future (Vol. 1, pp. 201–210). Palatine, IL: Skylight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: their development and education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1999). Tension, adaptability, and creativity. In S. W. Russ (Ed.), Affect, creative experience and psychological adjustment (pp. 185–194). Ann Arbor, MI: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1, 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives (pp. 1–51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic thoery of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., & Grotzer, T. (2010). Art works for schools. Project zero. Retrieved June 30, 2012, from http://pzweb.harvard.edu/research/ArtWks.htm

  • Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R. I., & Sarter, N. B. (1994). Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: CSE-RAIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang See Tan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, L.S., Ponnusamy, L.D. (2014). Adaptivity and Creativity in the Arts: The Nexus and Affordances. In: Hung, D., Lim, K., Lee, SS. (eds) Adaptivity as a Transformative Disposition. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-17-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics