Skip to main content

A Two-Field Formulation in Isogeometric Analysis to Alleviate Locking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Engineering Design

Abstract

In recent past, isogeometric analysis (IGA) has gained significant popularity as a numerical technique in computational mechanics. The systematic framework of IGA allows maintaining the exact geometry during discretization regardless of how coarse the mesh is, and furthermore, it also eliminates the dependency on computer-aided design (CAD) once the initial mesh is created. IGA often referred as a generalized version of finite element analysis (FEA) or with a different perspective FEA can be seen as a special case of IGA. Though IGA performs superior to FEA in several ways, it does exhibit similar limitations sooner or later like its FE counterpart. One such limitation is locking which appears during the analysis of thin structural parts and for incompressible or nearly incompressible material. However, on the promising side, the techniques available in FEA to tackle such limitations can be successfully modified to work with IGA as well. In the present work, a two-field hybrid formulation is explored in the framework of IGA which performs convincingly well in situations where the problem demands incompressibility or near incompressibility of material or to solve problems of beam/plate/shell geometries and so on. As per our best knowledge, the stated method is yet to be studied in context of IGA, despite the fact that the same formulation will eliminate different types of locking. Finally, the proposed formulation has been successfully implemented on several examples with promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book, 2nd edn. Springer, NewYork

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Echter R, Bischoff M (2010) Numerical efficiency, locking and unlocking of NURBS finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:374–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jog CS (2005) A 27-node hybrid brick and a 21-node hybrid wedge element for structural analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 41:1209–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jog CS, Kelkar PP (2006) Non-linear analysis of structures using high performance hybrid elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 68:473–501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jog CS (2010) Improved hybrid elements for structural analysis. J Mech Mater Struct 5:507–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Agrawal M, Nandy A, Jog CS (2019) A hybrid finite element formulation for large-deformation contact mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 356:407–434

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Roychowdhury A, Nandy A, Jog CS, Pratap R (2014) Hybrid elements for modelling squeeze film effects coupled with structural interactions in vibratory MEMS devives. CMES 1:1–15

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jog CS, Nandy A (2015) Conservation properties of the trapezoidal rule in linear time domain analysis of acoustics and structures. J Vib Acoust Trans ASME 137:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Agrawal V, Gautam SS (2018) IGA: a simplified introduction and implementation details for finite element users. J Inst Eng Ser C

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elguedj T, Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2008) B bar and F bar projection methods for nearly incompressible linear and non-linear elasticity and plasticity using higher-order NURBS elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2732–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen VP, Anitescu C, Bordas SPA, Rabczuk T (2015) Isogeometric analysis: an overview and computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simul 117:89–116

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiraj S. Bombarde .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bombarde, D.S., Nandy, A., Gautam, S.S. (2021). A Two-Field Formulation in Isogeometric Analysis to Alleviate Locking. In: Joshi, P., Gupta, S.S., Shukla, A.K., Gautam, S.S. (eds) Advances in Engineering Design. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4684-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4684-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4683-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4684-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics