Skip to main content

European Perspectives of Academic Integrity

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Academic Integrity

Abstract

This chapter presents evidence about how academic integrity is perceived and managed at tertiary level across the European Union (EU). Despite the moves during recent decades to harmonize EU higher education (HE) through the Bologna Process, governance of HE in different parts of Europe remains diverse and complex.

The project Impact of Policies for Plagiarism in Higher Education Across Europe (IPPHEAE 2010–2013) aimed to explore how academic integrity was understood and managed in different parts of the EU. The geographical scope of the research was confined to the then 27 member states of the EU. The main focus was on assessment for bachelor and master’s degrees rather than on research and doctorial level studies.

The evidence presented in this chapter is based on previous and concurrent research, documentary sources, and analysis of almost 5,000 responses to the IPPHEAE survey, with views from higher education students, academic teachers, senior managers, and individuals who were able to provide national and international perspectives.

Some common themes emerged from the research relating to academic integrity. In addition to some examples of good practice, there were indications across many of the countries and higher education institutions (HEI) studied of lack of awareness and immaturity in institutional responses for assuring integrity and academic quality affecting all parts of the educational process.

This 3-year study, taken together with related research elsewhere, showed that some EU countries, particularly the UK, Sweden, Austria, Republic of Ireland, and Slovakia, have taken significant steps, at national and institutional levels, to identify and address threats to academic standards. However, the findings indicated that much more could and should be done in every country studied to strengthen policies for encouraging scholarly practices and implementing consistent but proportional measures for deterring malpractice in both education and research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Glendinning.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Glendinning, I. (2016). European Perspectives of Academic Integrity. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_3

Download citation

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics