Skip to main content

Assessment of Industry 4.0 Adoption for Sustainability in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Fermatean Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0

Abstract

Recently, Industry 4.0 adoption has gained greater visibility and importance due to its implications for achieving sustainability. However, the lack of studies on adopting Industry 4.0 in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) has motivated the present research to investigate how SMEs integrate digital technologies with their conventional processes to achieve sustainability. To this end, indicators of Industry 4.0 adoption in SMEs were figured out through a literature review; consequently, a novel assessment method under Fermatean fuzzy sets was developed to evaluate five SMEs concerning the identified indicators. To be more specific, the proposed method, firstly, determines the objective weight of the identified indicators using FF-CRITIC; secondly, it evaluates SMEs using FF-TOPSIS. The results indicated that the most critical indicator is “flexible and agile production” out of sixteen identified indicators. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis was done to evaluate the sensitivity of the proposed method concerning the weight changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jamwal A, Agrawal R, Sharma M, Giallanza A (2021) Industry 4.0 technologies for manufacturing sustainability: a systematic review and future research directions. Appl Sci 11:5725.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saad SM, Bahadori R, Jafarnejad H (2021) The smart SME technology readiness assessment methodology in the context of industry 4.0. J Manuf Technol Management

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hofmann E, Rüsch M (2017) Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput Ind 89:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Maresova P, Soukal I, Svobodova L, Hedvicakova M, Javanmardi E, Selamat A, Krejcar O (2018) Consequences of industry 4.0 in business and economics. Economies 6:46.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siltori PF, Anholon R, Rampasso IS, Quelhas OL, Santa-Eulalia LA, Leal Filho W (2021) Industry 4.0 and corporate sustainability: an exploratory analysis of possible impacts in the Brazilian context. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 167:120741.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hermann M, Pentek T, Otto B (2016) Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 2016 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 3928−3937.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution, Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sniderman B, Mahto M, Cotteleer MJ (2016) Industry 4.0 and manufacturing ecosystems: exploring the world of connected enterprises. Deloitte Consult 1:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shahid N, Aneha S (2017) Internet of things: vision, application areas and research challenges. In: 2017 International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud)(I-SMAC). IEEE, 583−587.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buxmann P, Hess T, Ruggaber R (2009) Internet of services. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1:341–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Müller JM, Buliga O, Voigt K-I (2018) Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in industry 4.0. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 132:2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stentoft J, Adsboll Wickestrom K, Philipsen K, Haug A (2021) Drivers and barriers for Industry 4.0 readiness and practice: empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Prod Plan & Control 32:811-828

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masood T, Sonntag P (2020) Industry 4.0: adoption challenges and benefits for SMEs. Computers in Industry 121:103261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moeuf A, Pellerin R, Lamouri S, Tamayo-Giraldo S, Barbaray R (2018) The industrial management of SMEs in the era of industry 4.0. Int J Prod Res 56:1118–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soni G, Kumar S, Mahto RV, Mangla SK, Mittal M, Lim WM (2022) A decision-making framework for Industry 4.0 technology implementation: the case of FinTech and sustainable supply chain finance for SMEs. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 180:121686.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cimini C, Boffelli A, Lagorio A, Kalchschmidt M, Pinto R (2020) How do industry 4.0 technologies influence organisational change? an empirical analysis of Italian SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar R, Singh RK,Dwivedi YK (2020) Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: analysis of challenges. J Clean Prod 275:124063

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bai C, Sarkis J (2020) A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. Int J Prod Res 58:2142–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bai C, Dallasega P, Orzes G, Sarkis J (2020) Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: a sustainability perspective. Int J Prod Econ 229: 107776.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bag S, Gupta S, Kumar S (2021) Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. Int J Prod Econ 231: 107844.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dalenogare LS, Benitez GB, Ayala NF, Frank AG (2018) The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. Int J Prod Econ 204:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Sousa Jabbour ABL, Jabbour CJC, Foropon C, Godinho Filho M (2018) When titans meet–Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 132:18-25

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Dhone NC (2020) Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 58:1319–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ford S, Despeisse M (2016) Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. J Clean Prod 137:1573–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jin M, Tang R, Ji Y, Liu F, Gao L, Huisingh D (2017) Impact of advanced manufacturing on sustainability: an overview of the special volume on advanced manufacturing for sustainability and low fossil carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 161:69–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Gawankar SA (2018) Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:408–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lopes De Sousa Jabbour AB, Jabbour CJC, Godinho Filho M, Roubaud D. (2018) Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Ann Oper Res 270:273-286

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frey CB, Osborne MA (2017) The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol Forecast Soc Chang 114:254–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghobakhloo M (2020) Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J Clean Prod 252:119869.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pereira AC, Romero F (2017) A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept. Procedia Manuf 13:1206–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cezarino LO, Liboni LB, Stefanelli NO, Oliveria BG, Stocco LC (2019) Diving into emerging economies bottleneck: industry 4.0 and implications for circular economy. Manag Decis.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li L (2018) China’s manufacturing locus in 2025: with a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0.” Technol Forecast Soc Chang 135:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Man JC, Strandhagen JO (2017) An Industry 4.0 research agenda for sustainable business models. Procedia Cirp 63:721–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ibarra D, Ganzarain J, Igartua JI (2018) Business model innovation through industry 4.0: a review. Procedia Manuf 22:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Glova J, Sabol T, Vajda V (2014) Business models for the internet of things environment. Procedia Econ Financ 15:1122–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Margherita EG, Bua I (2021) The role of human resource practices for the development of operator 4.0 in Industry 4.0 organisations: a literature review and a research agenda. Businesses 1:18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chinachoti P (2018) The readiness of human resource management for industrial business sector towards industrial 4.0 in Thailand. Asian Adm & Manag Rev 1.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma M, Luthra S, Joshi S, Kumar A (2022) Analysing the impact of sustainable human resource management practices and industry 4.0 technologies adoption on employability skills. Int J Manpow

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sivathanu B, Pillai R (2018) Smart HR 4.0–how industry 4.0 is disrupting HR, Human Resource Management International Digest.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Beier G, Niehoff S, Ziems T, Xue B (2017) Sustainability aspects of a digitalized industry–a comparative study from China and Germany. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol 4:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Huang Z, Yu H, Peng Z, Feng Y (2017) Planning community energy system in the industry 4.0 era: achievements, challenges and a potential solution. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78:710–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kiel D, Muller JM, Arnold C, Voigt K-I (2020) Sustainable industrial value creation: benefits and challenges of industry 4.0. Digit Disruptive Innov. World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Beier G, Niehoff S, Xue B (2018) More sustainability in industry through industrial internet of things? Appl Sci 8:219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tortorella GL, Fettermann D (2018) Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Res 56:2975–2987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Venugopal V, Saleeshya P (2019) Manufacturing system sustainability through lean and agile initiatives. Int J Sustain Eng 12:159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Reis MS, Gins G (2017) Industrial process monitoring in the big data/industry 4.0 era: from detection, to diagnosis, to prognosis. Processes 5:35.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Konur S, Lan Y, Thakker D, Morkyani G, Polovina N, Sharp J (2021) Towards design and implementation of Industry 4.0 for food manufacturing. Neural Comput Appl, 1−13.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wang S, Wan J, Zhang D, Li D, Zhang C (2016) Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput Netw 101:158–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang S, Wan J, Li D, Zhang C (2016b) Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: an outlook. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 12:3159805.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Niaki MK, Torabi SA, Nonino F (2019) Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: the role of sustainability. J Clean Prod 222:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lasi H, Fettke P, Kemper H-G, Feld T, Hoffmann M (2014) Industry 4.0. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6:239–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Oliveira-Dias D, Maqueira JM, Moyano-Fuentes J (2022) The link between information and digital technologies of industry 4.0 and agile supply chain: mapping current research and establishing new research avenues. Comput & Ind Eng, 108000.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Raji IO, Shevtshenko E, Rossi T, Strozzi F (2021) Industry 4.0 technologies as enablers of lean and agile supply chain strategies: an exploratory investigation. Int J Logist Management

    Google Scholar 

  54. Singh RK, Kumar P, Chand M (2019) Evaluation of supply chain coordination index in context to Industry 4.0 environment. Benchmarking: Int J

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vinuesa R, Azizpour H, Leite I, Balaam M, Dignum V, Domisch S, Felländer A, Langhans SD, Tegmark M, Fuso Nerini F (2020) The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nat Commun 11:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. El Baz J, Tiwari S, Akenroye T, Cherrafi A, Derrouiche R (2022) A framework of sustainability drivers and externalities for industry 4.0 technologies using the Best-Worst Method. J Clean Prod, 130909.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Choti TM, Kumar S, Yue X, Chan HL (2021) Disruptive technologies and operations management in the Industry 4.0 era and beyond. Prod Oper Manag

    Google Scholar 

  58. Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56:2941–2962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bleicher J, Stanley H (2018) Digitization as a catalyst for business model innovation a three-step approach to facilitating economic success. J Bus Manag 4:62–71

    Google Scholar 

  60. Brougham D, Haar J (2018) Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. J Manag Organ 24:239–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Braccini AM, Margherita EG (2018) Exploring organizational sustainability of industry 4.0 under the triple bottom line: the case of a manufacturing company. Sustainability 11:36.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Nara EOB, da Costa MB, Baierle IC, Schaefer JL, Benitez GB,Do Santos LMAL, Benitez LB (2021) Expected impact of industry 4.0 technologies on sustainable development: a study in the context of Brazil's plastic industry. Sustain Prod Consum 25:102-122

    Google Scholar 

  63. Benitez GB, Ferreira-Lima M, Ayala NF, Frank AG (2021) Industry 4.0 technology provision: the moderating role of supply chain partners to support technology providers. Supply Chain Manag: Int J.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Frank AG, Dalenogare LS, Ayala NF (2019) Industry 4.0 technologies: implementation patterns in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ 210:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Bechtsis D, Tsolakis N, Vlachos D, Srai JS (2018) Intelligent autonomous vehicles in digital supply chains: a framework for integrating innovations towards sustainable value networks. J Clean Prod 181:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dolgui A, Ivanov D, Sethi SP, Sokolov B (2019) Scheduling in production, supply chain and Industry 4.0 systems by optimal control: fundamentals, state-of-the-art and applications. Int J Prod Res 57:411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B (2019) The impact of digital technology and industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. Int J Prod Res 57:829–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wang B, Zhao J-Y, Wan Z-G, MA J-H, LI H, MA J (2016a) Lean intelligent production system and value stream practice. Trans Econom Manag (ICEM 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kolberg D, Knobloch J, Zühlke D (2017) Towards a lean automation interface for workstations. Int J Prod Res 55:2845–2856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Åkerman M, Fast-Berglund Å, Halvordsson E, Stahre J (2018) Modularized assembly system: a digital innovation hub for the swedish smart industry. Manufacturing Letters 15:143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Kolberg D, Zühlke D (2015) Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48:1870–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sisinni E, Saifullah A, Han S, Jennehag U, Gidlund M (2018) Industrial internet of things: challenges, opportunities, and directions. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 14:4724–4734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Shoval S, Efatmaneshnik M (2019) Managing complexity of assembly with modularity: a cost and benefit analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105:3815–3828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Gupta P (2019) Modularity enablers: a tool for Industry 4.0. Life Cycle Reliab Saf Eng 8:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  75. Ardito L, Petruzzelli AM, Panniello U, Garavelli AC (2018) Towards industry 4.0: mapping digital technologies for supply chain management-marketing integration. Bus Process Manag J

    Google Scholar 

  76. Braganca S, Costa E, Castellucci I, Arezes PM (2019) A brief overview of the use of collaborative robots in industry 4.0: human role and safety. Occup Environ Saf Health, 641−650.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Maurice P, Padois V, Measson Y, Bidaud P (2017) Human-oriented design of collaborative robots. Int J Ind Ergon 57:88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Schou C, Andersen RS, Chrysostomou D, Bøgh S, Madsen O (2018) Skill-based instruction of collaborative robots in industrial settings. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 53:72–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Gu X, Koren Y (2018) Manufacturing system architecture for cost-effective mass-individualization. Manufacturing letters 16:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Torn I, Vaneker TH (2019) Mass personalization with Industry 4.0 by SMEs: a concept for collaborative networks. Procedia Manuf 28:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Yang C, Lan S, Shen W, Huang GQ, Wang X, Lin T (2017) Towards product customization and personalization in IoT-enabled cloud manufacturing. Clust Comput 20:1717–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Leng J, Liu Q, Ye S, Jing J, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang D, Chen X (2020) Digital twin-driven rapid reconfiguration of the automated manufacturing system via an open architecture model. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 63:101895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wamba SF, Queiroz MM (2022) Industry 4.0 and the supply chain digitalisation: a blockchain diffusion perspective. Prod Plan & Control 33:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22:763–770

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. Babatunde OM, Munda JL, Hamam Y (2019) Selection of a hybrid renewable energy systems for a low-income household. Sustainability 11:4282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Xu C, Ke Y, Li Y, Chu H, Wu Y (2020) Data-driven configuration optimization of an off-grid wind/PV/hydrogen system based on modified NSGA-II and CRITIC-TOPSIS. Energy Convers Manage 215:112892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Durmaz E, Akan Ş, Bakir M (2020) Service quality and financial performance analysis in low-cost airlines: an integrated multi-criteria quadrant application. Int J Econ Bus Res 20:168–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Marjanovic I, Popovic Ž (2020) MCDM approach for assessment of financial performance of serbian banks. Bus Perform Financ InstS Eur. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Adali EA, Tus A (2021) Hospital site selection with distance-based multi-criteria decision-making methods. Int J Healthc Manag 14:534-544

    Google Scholar 

  90. Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (pp 1–137). Physica, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  91. Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Sys 22(4):958–965. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989

  92. Kamali Saraji M, Streimikiene D, Kyriakopoulos GL (2021) Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS method for evaluating the challenges to industry 4.0 adoption for a sustainable digital transformation. Sustainability 13:9577.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11:663–674

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. Saraji MK, Streimikiene D, Lauzadyte-Tutliene A (2021) A novel pythogorean Fuzzy-SWARA-CRITIC-COPRAS method for evaluating the barriers to developing business model innovation for sustainability. In: Handbook of research on novel practices and current successes in achieving the sustainable development goals. IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Kamali Saraji M, Streimikiene D, Ciegis R (2022) A novel pythagorean fuzzy-SWARA-TOPSIS framework for evaluating the EU progress towards sustainable energy development. Environ Monit Assess 194:1-19

    Google Scholar 

  96. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M, Amiri M, Hashemi-Tabatabaei M, Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A (2020) A new decision-making approach based on fermatean fuzzy sets and WASPAS for green construction supplier evaluation. Mathematics 8:2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Ding B, Ferras Hernandez X, Agell Jane N (2021) Combining lean and agile manufacturing competitive advantages through Industry 4.0 technologies: an integrative approach. Prod Plan & Control, 1−17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalia Streimikiene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kamali Saraji, M., Streimikiene, D. (2023). Assessment of Industry 4.0 Adoption for Sustainability in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Fermatean Approach. In: Gholami, H., Abdul-Nour, G., Sharif, S., Streimikiene, D. (eds) Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7218-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7218-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7217-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7218-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics