Skip to main content

Bioremediation and Functional Metagenomics: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Omics Insights in Environmental Bioremediation

Abstract

Non-degradable pollutants have emerged as a consequence of industrialization, population increment, and changing lifestyles, endangering human well-being and the environment. Biological techniques based on microorganisms are gaining popularity as an environmentally beneficial and cost-effective way to reduce pollution. Microorganisms may thrive in a variety of environments and create metabolites that degrade and change contaminants, allowing contaminated places to be organically revived. For a greater knowledge of biological and life sciences, multiple technologies have begun to be integrated into metagenomics. Technology such as metagenomics is now being used to develop strategies for studying the ecology and variety of microbes, as well as its application in the environment. Metagenomics is a novel and rapidly expanding discipline of environmental biology that provides a strong tool for accessing information on the genomes of environmental microorganisms and entire microbial communities. The application of metagenomics in environmental surveying and bioremediation is becoming more usual. In recent years, a number of functional metagenomics techniques have been used to investigate a wide range of resistant microbial degradation mechanisms. In a metagenomic investigation, it is critical to identify and screen metagenomes from the polluted location. These procedures are well-known for their effectiveness in eliminating many types of contaminants. These strategies may change rapidly as technology develops, but the once that focus on the best ways to improve bioremediation of the contaminated places will be the most successful. Culture-independent molecular approaches, on the other hand, can disclose very relevant information on the metagenome of environmental microorganisms, which play a key role in biogeochemical cycles and the breakdown and detoxification of environmental pollutants. These high-throughput studies would assist in the discovery of novel species for bioremediation, as well as providing new and interesting insights into their primary biodegradative processes at the molecular level. In this chapter, we are attempting to convey an overview that how functional one of the finest bioremediation adaptations that leads to the development of a clean non-toxic environment is metagenomics. We also went through the metagenomics analysis methods with respect to bioremediation. In addition to this, we provide an overview of examples of metagenomics in bioremediation which have recently been reported. Furthermore, our study clarifies the widespread use of metagenomes formed from metagenomics communities, which are capable of comprehending environmental pollutants and poisons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal N, Kumar V, Shahi SK (2021) Biodegradation and detoxification of phenanthrene in in-vitro and in-vivo conditions by a newly isolated ligninolytic fungus Coriolopsis byrsina strain APC5 and characterization of their metabolites for environmental safety. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15271-w

  • Atlas R, Bragg JR (2009) Bioremediation of marine oil spills: when and when not - the Exxon Valdez experience. Microb Biotechnol 2:213–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baker KH, Herson DS (1994) Bioremediation. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boll M, Löffler C, Morris BEL, Kung JW (2014) Anaerobic degradation of homocyclic aromatic compounds via arylcarboxyl-coenzyme A esters: organisms, strategies and key enzymes. Environ Microbiol 16:612–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boopathy R (2000) Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour Technol 74:63–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty R, Wu CH, Hazen TC (2012) Systems biology approach to bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:483–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra R, Kumar V, Yadav S (2015) Microbial degradation of lignocellulosic waste and its metabolic products. In: Chandra R (ed) Environmental waste management. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan A, Singh J (2015) Biodegradation of DDT. J Textile Sci Eng 5:1–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Murrell JC (2010) When metagenomics meets stable-isotope probing: progress and perspectives. Trends Microbiol 18:157–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD (2007) Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom Rev 26:51–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fantroussi S, Agathos SN (2005) Is bioaugmentation a feasible strategy for pollutant removal and site remediation? Curr Opin Microbiol 8:268–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fomina M, Gadd GM (2014) Biosorption: current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresour Technol 160:3–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franzosa EA, Hsu T, Sirota-Madi A, Shafquat A, Abu-Ali G, Morgan XC et al (2015) Sequencing and beyond: integrating molecular ‘omics’ for microbial community profiling. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:360–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield E, Merton RK (1979) Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, vol 8. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grath SP, Chaudri AM, Giller KE (1994) Summary 15th world congress of soil science. Acapulco, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman J (2004) Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68(4):669–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman J (2005) Sorting out metagenomes. Nat Biotechnol 23(1):38–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harekrushna S, Kumar DC (2012) A review on: bioremediation. Int J Res Chem Environ 2(1):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK, Bajpai V (2012) Biotechnology of bioremediation- a review. Int J Environ Sci 3:535–549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jan B, Beilen V, Neuenschwunder M (2003) Rubredoxins involved in alkane degradation. J Bacteriol 184(1722–1732):97

    Google Scholar 

  • Jilani S, Altaf Khan M (2004) Isolation, characterization and growth response of pesticides degrading bacteria. J Biol Sci 4(15–20):96

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi MN et al (2014) Metagenomics of petroleum muck: revealing microbial diversity and depicting microbial syntrophy. Arch Microbiol 196(8):531–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Khanna S (2010) Diversity of 16S rRNA and dioxygenase genes detected in coal-tar-contaminated site undergoing active bioremediation. J Appl Microbiol 108:1252–1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Shahi SK, Singh S (2018) Bioremediation: an eco-sustainable approach for restoration of contaminated sites. In: Microbial bioprospecting for sustainable development. Springer, Singapore, pp 115–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Thakur IS, Singh AK, Shah MP (2020) Application of metagenomics in remediation of contaminated sites and environmental restoration. In: Shah M, Rodriguez-Couto S, Sengor SS (eds) Emerging technologies in environmental bioremediation. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819860-5.00008-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Singh K, Shah MP, Singh AK, Kumar A, Kumar Y (2021) Application of omics technologies for microbial community structure and function analysis in contaminated environment. In: Shah MP, Sarkar A, Mandal S (eds) Wastewater treatment: cutting edge molecular tools, techniques & applied aspects in waste water treatment. Elsevier, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821925-6.00013-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Agrawal S, Shahi SK, Motghare A, Singh S, Ramamurthy PC (2022) Bioremediation potential of newly isolated Bacillus albus strain VKDS9 for decolourization and detoxification of biomethanated distillery effluent and its metabolites characterization for environmental sustainability. Environ Technol Innov 26:102260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.102260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumavath RN, Deverapalli P (2013) Scientific swift in bioremediation: an overview. Intech Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JH (2013) An overview of phytoremediation as a potentially promising technology for environmental pollution control. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 18(431):439

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitão AL (2009) Potential of Penicillium species in the bioremediation field. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(4):1393–1417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Li YH, Li S, Hu N, He Y, Pong R et al (2012) Comparison of next-generation sequencing systems. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:251364. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/251364

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lovey DR (2003) Cleaning up with genomics: applying molecular biology to bioremediation. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzker ML (2009) Sequencing technologies-the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 11(1):31–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meysami P, Baheri H (2003) Prescreening of fungi and bulking agents for contaminated soil bioremediation. Adv Environ Res 7(881–887):149

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul D, Pandey G, Pandey J, Jain RK (2005) Accessing microbial diversity for bioremediation and environmental restoration. Trends Biotechnol 23:135–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perpetuo EA, Souza CB, Nascimento CAO (2011) Engineering bacteria for bioremediation. In: Carpi A (ed) Progress in molecular and environmental bioengineering—from analysis and modeling to technology applications. InTech, Rijeka, pp 605–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad R (2014) New approaches and insights into bioremediation of hazardous waste. Rev Environ Health 29(1–2):33–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Röling WF (2015) Maths on microbes: adding microbial ecophysiology to metagenomics. Microb Biotechnol 8(1):21–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah V, Jain K, Desai C, Madamwar D (2011) Metagenomics and integrative – omics’ technologies in microbial bioremediation: current trends and potential applications. In: Metagenomics: current innovations and future trends. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 211–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S (2012) Bioremediation: features, strategies and applications. Asian J Pharm Life Sci 2(2):202–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon C, Daniel R (2009) Achievements and new knowledge unraveled by metagenomic approaches. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85(2):265–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Singh P, Sharma R (2014) Microorganism as a tool of bioremediation technology for cleaning environment: a review. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci 4(1):1–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor E, Reimer D (2008) Oil persistence on beaches in Prince William sound—a review of SCAT surveys conducted from 1989 to 2002. Mar Pollut Bull 43:458–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa B, Kumar A, Ghimire A (2012) A review on bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu Univ J Sci Eng Technol 8(1):164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen RJ (2002) Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors. Res Policy 31(4):509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tringe SG, Rubin EM (2005) Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nat Rev Genet 6(11):805–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valiente G, Pesole G (2012) Bioinformatics approaches and tools for metage nomic analysis. Editorial. Brief Bioinform 13(6):645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varma R, Turner A, Brown MT (2011) Bioaccumulation of metals by Fucus ceranoides in estuaries of South West England. Mar Pollut Bull 62(11):2557–2562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verma JP, Jaiswal DK (2016) Book review: advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of indust yerial waste. Front Microbiol 6:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe K (2001) Microorganisms relevant to bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12(3):237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood TK (2008) Molecular approaches in bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19:572–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Bennett GN (2005) Biodegradation of xenobiotics by anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67(5):600–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garima Kaushik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sokal, S., Palsania, P., Kaushik, G. (2022). Bioremediation and Functional Metagenomics: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities. In: Kumar, V., Thakur, I.S. (eds) Omics Insights in Environmental Bioremediation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4320-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics