Skip to main content

Quality Factors for Agro-touristic Websites—An Exploratory Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Marketing and Smart Technologies

Abstract

In this paper, the authors analyzed 6 selected websites of Polish agritourism farms using the WebQual questionnaire to determine their quality factors. The conducted analysis involved remote study with users’ participation. The factors, which were taken under consideration during the analysis, focused on the functionality, usability, and aesthetics of the websites. The analysis was conducted according to WebQual method and used its questionnaire form. The main objective of the paper is to answer the question about the quality of the websites of agritourism farms in Poland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The WebQual survey in Polish along with the URLs of surveyed websites is available on: https://forms.gle/vSTrsPfy1x4UPknc9.

References

  1. Brady, R., Forrest, E., Mizerski, R.: Marketing w internecie. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rutecka, P.: Właściciel agroturystycznego przedsiębiorstwa rodzinnego jako brand-hero marki. In: Nowe trendy w rozwoju firm rodzinnych, pp. 79–93. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Częstochowskiej, Częstochowa (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fabisiak, L., Wolski, W.: Metody analizy wielokryterialnej w ocenie użyteczności serwisów internetowych. Stud. Mater. Pol. Stowarzyszenia Zarządzania Wiedzą. 27, 116–125 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Radziszewska, A.: Kryteria oceny jakości komercyjnych serwisów internetowych. Mark. Rynek. 49–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Utami, I.S., Winarno, Setiadi, H.: Analysis the effect of website quality on user satisfaction with the WebQual 4.0 method and importance-performance analysis (IPA) (case study: SPMB Sebelas Maret University’s Website). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1842, 012003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012003

  6. Napitupulu, D.: Analysis of factors affecting the website quality (study case: XYZ University). Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 7, 792 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.3.1748

  7. Fam, S.F., Huang, J., Chuan, Z.L., Khalil, S.N., Prastyo, D.D., Nusa, F.N.M.: Fuzzy TOPSIS method as a decision supporting system to rank Malaysia online shopping website quality during COVID-19 MCO 2020. Int. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Res. 8, 6397–6405 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/239892020

  8. Hsu, M.H., Chang, C.M., Chu, K.K., Lee, Y.J.: Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: The perspectives of DeLone & McLean is success model and trust. Comput. Human Behav. 36, 234–245 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.03.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rozekhi, N.A., Hussin, S., Noor, A.M.: Attributable E-commerce toward Purchase Intention: Online Search of Food Product. SIJ Trans. Adv. Sp. Res. Earth Explor. 4, 6–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.9756/SIJASREE/V4I1/0203410401

  10. Bai, B., Law, R., Wen, I.: The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: evidence from Chinese online visitors. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 27, 391–402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2007.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Maksimovic, M., Popovic, G., Momcilovic, O.: An approach to evaluating the quality of websites based on the weighted sum preferred levels of performances method. Acta Polytech. Hungarica 16, 195–215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.16.5.2019.5.11

  12. Kim, S., Stoel, L.: Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 11, 109–117 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(03)00010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barnes, S., Vidgen, R.: An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 3, 114–127 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A.: Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach. Decis. Support Syst. 42, 1383–1401 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lemonakis, C., Zopounidis, C., Koliouska, C., Andreopoulou, Z.: Internet and agro-tourism sector for regional development in Crete: a multicriteria ranking. Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci. 9, 116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2017.10005872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Król, K.: Promoting of agrotourism on the internet. A lesson from the Visegrad Group countries. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. 16, 805–813 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17306/J.JARD.2017.00383

  17. Beldona, S., Cai, L.A.: An exploratory evaluation of rural tourism websites. J. Conv. Event Tour. 8, 69–80 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1300/J452V08N01_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dimitriadou, E., Lamprouli, I., Iakovidou, O.: Adapting new technologies of exposure and promotion for agro-tourism enterprises with comparative evaluations. Asian J. Agric. Rural Dev. 9, 274–283 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1005/2019.9.2/1005.2.274.283

  19. Ipsos MediaCT: Google travel study. The 2014 traveler’s road to decision. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oplanić, M., Težak Damijanić, A., Saftić, D., Čehić, A.: The internet as a source of information about local agro-food product. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 20, 759–769 (2019). https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/20.2.2127

  21. Rabadán-Martín, I., Aguado-Correa, F., Padilla-Garrido, N.: Facing new challenges in rural tourism: signaling quality via website. Inf. Technol. Tour. 21, 559–576 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-019-00157-y

  22. Heung, V.C.S.: Internet usage by international travellers: reasons and barriers. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage. 15, 370–378 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110310496015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gössling, S., Lane, B.: Rural tourism and the development of Internet-based accommodation booking platforms: a study in the advantages, dangers and implications of innovation. J. Sustain. Tour. 23, 1386–1403 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.909448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brščić, K., Dropulić Ružić, M., Ružic, D.: Is Agrotourism Popular on the Internet? J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 13, 221–235 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/13.2.1038

  25. Duarte, P., Pais, A.R.: Use and perception of the internet as a marketing tool to promote rural tourism. Work. Pap. Gestão, Econ. e Mark. (Management, Econmic and Marketing Working Paper) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li, X., Wang, Y., Yu, Y.: Present and future hotel website marketing activities: change propensity analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 47, 131–139 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Pelsmacker, P., van Tilburg, S., Holthof, C.: Digital marketing strategies, online reviews and hotel performance. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 72, 47–55 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Akpinar, N., Talay, İ, Ceylan, C., Gündüz, S.: Rural women and agrotourism in the context of sustainable rural development: a case study from Turkey. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 6, 473–486 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-005-5633-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Santeramo, F.G., Barbieri, C.: On the demand for agritourism: a cursory review of methodologies and practice (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2015.1137968

  30. Sznajder, M., Przezbórska, L.: Agroturystyka. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wojciechowska, J.: Systematyka i wyróżniki pojęć dotyczących turystyki na obszarach wiejskich. Stud. nad Tur. Tradycje, stan obecny i Perspekt. Badaw. 5, 297–310 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Karagiannis, S., Stavroulakis, D.: Development of agrotourism through the application of internet technologies: problems and perspectives. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 299–308. CEUR-WS (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fanelli, R.M., Romagnoli, L.: Customer satisfaction with farmhouse facilities and its implications for the promotion of agritourism resources in Italian municipalities. Sustainability 12, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051749

  34. Busby, G., Rendle, S.: The transition from tourism on farms to farm tourism. Tour. Manage. 21, 635–642 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00011-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stoddard, J.E.: Sustainable Tourism The Case of the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965508320574

  36. Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., Ekinci, Y.: Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: enhancing reviews’ usefulness for high risk-averse travelers. J. Bus. Res. 68, 1829–1835 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2015.01.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Litvin, S.W., Goldsmith, R.E., Pan, B.: Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tour. Manage. 29, 458–468 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TOURMAN.2007.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: The selection and comparison of the methods used to evaluate the quality of e-banking websites: the perspective of individual clients. In: Procedia Computer Science, pp. 1903–1922. Elsevier B.V. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fernandes Andry, J., Christianto, K., Wilujeng, F.R.: Using Webqual 4.0 and importance performance analysis to evaluate e-commerce website. J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell. 5, (2019). https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.5.1.23-31

  40. Ziemba, P.: Zastosowanie korelacji i metody wielokryterialnego podejmowania decyzji przy doborze kryteriów oceny serwisów internetowych. Ekonometria 154–164 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Piwowarski, M., Ziemba, P.: Zastosowanie modelu Equal 4.0 do oceny złożonych serwisów internetowych. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Szczecińskiego. Ekon. Probl. Usług. 681–688 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karina Cicha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cicha, K., Rutecka, P. (2022). Quality Factors for Agro-touristic Websites—An Exploratory Study. In: Reis, J.L., López, E.P., Moutinho, L., Santos, J.P.M.d. (eds) Marketing and Smart Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 279. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9268-0_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9268-0_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9267-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9268-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics