Abstract
Scholars have repeatedly advocated that “water crisis is a crisis of governance” ( GWP. (2000). Towards Water Security: A Framework for Action. Stockholm: GWP.; Zwarteveen, M., Kemerink-Seyoum, J. S., Kooy, M., Evers, J., Guerrero, T. A., Batubara, B.,... Wesselink, A. (2017). Engaging with the politics of water goverance. WIREs Water, 1–9.;). Today, urban water resources are under serious threat with the rapid growing urbanization, climate change, and declining freshwater reserves. Cities worldwide either strained due to severe water crises or motivated by societal reform have fostered sustainable water sector changes. The water in cities has always been a subject of social and political control to enable infrastructure financing and governance. Since the past few decades, water governance advocacy has been promising to promote sustainable water uses and management. It was considered one of the top three priority action areas at the Boon Freshwater conference of 2001. Since then, various advocacy and academic documents have propagated the concept of water governance. Despite such attention given to water governance, little implementation of it is seen on the ground. One reason for this could be the lack of a clear and consistent definition of the term. Another reason for this could be attributed to the lack of regulatory or policy framework towards implementing such newer concepts. These limitations are further grave for developing countries as these concepts have been developed in the global north with little consideration of replicability. This paper would, thus, aim at defining a working definition of water governance, context-specific to the Indian Context. The later sections of the paper would critically analyse the legal and regulatory framework existing in such a context and suggest a way forward, taking India as a case. Such research provides an empirical foundation for further engagement on a fit-to-purpose implication of such terms and concepts amongst water professionals, academicians, urban planners, and researchers interested in urban water and systems
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Established in 1996, by the World Bank, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Global Water Partnership, encompasses international government agencies, donor organizations, and public and private institutes actively engaged in the water sector. Currently, GWP has about 3,000 Partner organizations in 179 countries.
References
Woodhouse P, Muller M (2017) Water governance—an historical perspective on current debates. World Dev 225–241
Bell S (2014) Renegotiating urban water. Process in Planning
Zwarteveen M, Kemerink-Seyoum JS, Kooy M, Evers J, Guerrero TA, Batubara B, Wesselink A, et al (2017) Engaging with the politics of water goverance. WIREs Water 1–9
Wilson NJ, Harris LM, Nelson J, Shah SH (2019) Re-theorizing politics inwater governance. Water Gov Retheorizing Polit 1–13
Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, Viklander M, et al (2015) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 525–542
Grey D, Sadoff CW (2007) Sink or Swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy 545–571
Gupta J, Akhmouch A, Cosgrove W, Hurwitz Z, Maestu J, Ünver O (2013) Policymakers’ reflections on water governance issues. Ecol Soc 35
Pahl-Wostl C, Gupta J, Petry D (2008) Governance and the global water system: a theoretical exploration. Global Gov Water Trends Processes Ideas Fut 419–435
Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee (TEC), Sweden
GWP (2000) Towards water security: a framework for action. GWP, Stockholm
Sehring J (2009) The politics of water institutional reform in neopatrimonial states: a comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
UNESCO (2003) Water for people, water for life. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Orgnaisation (UNESCO) and Berghahn Books, Barcelona
Lautze J, de Silva S, Giordano M, Sanford L (2011) Putting the cart before the horse:water governance and IWRM. Nat Res Forum 1–8
UNDP (2004) Water governance for poverty reduction. United Nations Development Programme, New York
OECD (2015) OECD principles on water governance. Adopted by the OECD Regional Development Policy Committee
FAO (2019) Land and water governance to achieve the SDGs in fragile systems. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome
Head B (2010) Wicked problems in water governance: paradigm changes to promote water sustainability and address planning uncertainty. The urban water security research alliance technical report no 38
Bichai F, Flamini AC (2018) The water-sensitive city: implications of an urban water management paradigm and its globalization. Wiley Interdisc Rev Water 1–9
Poustie MS, Deletic A (2014) Modeling integrated urban water systems in developing countries: case study of Port Vila, Vanuatu. AMBIO 1093–1111
Adams EA, Zulu L, Ouellette-Kray Q (2020) Community water governance for urban water security in the Global South: status, lessons, and prospects. WIREs Water
Lu F, Ocampo-Raeder C, Crow B (2014) Equitable water governance: future directions in the understanding and analysis of water inequities in the global South. Water Int 129–142
Ahmed M, Araral E (2019) Water governance in India: evidence on water law, policy, and administration from eight indian states. Water
NITI Aayog (2020) India voluntary national review 2020, Decade of action—taking SDGs from global to local. NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi
Pandit C, Biswas AK (2019) India’s national water policy: ‘feel good’ document, nothing more. Int J Water Resource Dev 1015–1028
Biswas AK, Rangachari R, Tortajada C (2009) Water resources of the Indian subcontinent (pp 400). Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Farrelly M, Brown R (2011) Rethinking urban water management: experimentation as a way forward? Global Environ Change 721–732
Nevill J (2007) Policy failure: Australian freshwater protected area networks. Aust J Environ Manage 35–47
Acknowledgements
The Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, and the Dutch Research Council (NWO) provided joint funding to “Water4Change”. The DST, Government of India, supports the Indian Water4Change activity to CEPT University under sanction order number F. No. DST/TM/EWO/WTI/NWO/2K19/02 (C2) and G(2) dated 1 October 2019.
Water4Change is a five-year (2019–2024) research project to help formulate an integrative and fit-for-purpose water-sensitive design framework for secondary Indian cities. Out of the four work packages, CEPT University (Ahmedabad) and the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands lead the work package on spatial-ecological water-sensitive planning and design.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Doshi, S., Sharma, R. (2022). The Role of Water Governance in Ensuring Water Security: A Case of Indian Cities. In: Kolathayar, S., Mondal, A., Chian, S.C. (eds) Climate Change and Water Security. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 178. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5501-2_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5501-2_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5500-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5501-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)