Skip to main content

The Role of Water Governance in Ensuring Water Security: A Case of Indian Cities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Climate Change and Water Security

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 178))

Abstract

Scholars have repeatedly advocated that “water crisis is a crisis of governance” ( GWP. (2000). Towards Water Security: A Framework for Action. Stockholm: GWP.; Zwarteveen, M., Kemerink-Seyoum, J. S., Kooy, M., Evers, J., Guerrero, T. A., Batubara, B.,... Wesselink, A. (2017). Engaging with the politics of water goverance. WIREs Water, 1–9.;). Today, urban water resources are under serious threat with the rapid growing urbanization, climate change, and declining freshwater reserves. Cities worldwide either strained due to severe water crises or motivated by societal reform have fostered sustainable water sector changes. The water in cities has always been a subject of social and political control to enable infrastructure financing and governance. Since the past few decades, water governance advocacy has been promising to promote sustainable water uses and management. It was considered one of the top three priority action areas at the Boon Freshwater conference of 2001. Since then, various advocacy and academic documents have propagated the concept of water governance. Despite such attention given to water governance, little implementation of it is seen on the ground. One reason for this could be the lack of a clear and consistent definition of the term. Another reason for this could be attributed to the lack of regulatory or policy framework towards implementing such newer concepts. These limitations are further grave for developing countries as these concepts have been developed in the global north with little consideration of replicability. This paper would, thus, aim at defining a working definition of water governance, context-specific to the Indian Context. The later sections of the paper would critically analyse the legal and regulatory framework existing in such a context and suggest a way forward, taking India as a case. Such research provides an empirical foundation for further engagement on a fit-to-purpose implication of such terms and concepts amongst water professionals, academicians, urban planners, and researchers interested in urban water and systems

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Established in 1996, by the World Bank, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the Global Water Partnership, encompasses international government agencies, donor organizations, and public and private institutes actively engaged in the water sector. Currently, GWP has about 3,000 Partner organizations in 179 countries.

References

  1. Woodhouse P, Muller M (2017) Water governance—an historical perspective on current debates. World Dev 225–241

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell S (2014) Renegotiating urban water. Process in Planning

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zwarteveen M, Kemerink-Seyoum JS, Kooy M, Evers J, Guerrero TA, Batubara B, Wesselink A, et al (2017) Engaging with the politics of water goverance. WIREs Water 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson NJ, Harris LM, Nelson J, Shah SH (2019) Re-theorizing politics inwater governance. Water Gov Retheorizing Polit 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, Viklander M, et al (2015) SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 525–542

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grey D, Sadoff CW (2007) Sink or Swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy 545–571

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta J, Akhmouch A, Cosgrove W, Hurwitz Z, Maestu J, Ünver O (2013) Policymakers’ reflections on water governance issues. Ecol Soc 35

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pahl-Wostl C, Gupta J, Petry D (2008) Governance and the global water system: a theoretical exploration. Global Gov Water Trends Processes Ideas Fut 419–435

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rogers P, Hall AW (2003) Effective water governance. Global Water Partnership Technical Committee (TEC), Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  10. GWP (2000) Towards water security: a framework for action. GWP, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sehring J (2009) The politics of water institutional reform in neopatrimonial states: a comparative analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  12. UNESCO (2003) Water for people, water for life. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Orgnaisation (UNESCO) and Berghahn Books, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lautze J, de Silva S, Giordano M, Sanford L (2011) Putting the cart before the horse:water governance and IWRM. Nat Res Forum 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNDP (2004) Water governance for poverty reduction. United Nations Development Programme, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. OECD (2015) OECD principles on water governance. Adopted by the OECD Regional Development Policy Committee

    Google Scholar 

  16. FAO (2019) Land and water governance to achieve the SDGs in fragile systems. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  17. Head B (2010) Wicked problems in water governance: paradigm changes to promote water sustainability and address planning uncertainty. The urban water security research alliance technical report no 38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bichai F, Flamini AC (2018) The water-sensitive city: implications of an urban water management paradigm and its globalization. Wiley Interdisc Rev Water 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poustie MS, Deletic A (2014) Modeling integrated urban water systems in developing countries: case study of Port Vila, Vanuatu. AMBIO 1093–1111

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adams EA, Zulu L, Ouellette-Kray Q (2020) Community water governance for urban water security in the Global South: status, lessons, and prospects. WIREs Water

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lu F, Ocampo-Raeder C, Crow B (2014) Equitable water governance: future directions in the understanding and analysis of water inequities in the global South. Water Int 129–142

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed M, Araral E (2019) Water governance in India: evidence on water law, policy, and administration from eight indian states. Water

    Google Scholar 

  23. NITI Aayog (2020) India voluntary national review 2020, Decade of action—taking SDGs from global to local. NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pandit C, Biswas AK (2019) India’s national water policy: ‘feel good’ document, nothing more. Int J Water Resource Dev 1015–1028

    Google Scholar 

  25. Biswas AK, Rangachari R, Tortajada C (2009) Water resources of the Indian subcontinent (pp 400). Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  26. Farrelly M, Brown R (2011) Rethinking urban water management: experimentation as a way forward? Global Environ Change 721–732

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nevill J (2007) Policy failure: Australian freshwater protected area networks. Aust J Environ Manage 35–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, and the Dutch Research Council (NWO) provided joint funding to “Water4Change”. The DST, Government of India, supports the Indian Water4Change activity to CEPT University under sanction order number F. No. DST/TM/EWO/WTI/NWO/2K19/02 (C2) and G(2) dated 1 October 2019.

Water4Change is a five-year (2019–2024) research project to help formulate an integrative and fit-for-purpose water-sensitive design framework for secondary Indian cities. Out of the four work packages, CEPT University (Ahmedabad) and the Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands lead the work package on spatial-ecological water-sensitive planning and design.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siddh Doshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Doshi, S., Sharma, R. (2022). The Role of Water Governance in Ensuring Water Security: A Case of Indian Cities. In: Kolathayar, S., Mondal, A., Chian, S.C. (eds) Climate Change and Water Security. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 178. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5501-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5501-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5500-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5501-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics