Abstract
This chapter presents the characteristics of good mathematics lessons from the lens of typical secondary school students in Singapore. This chapter begins by examining the student perception in relation to the five inter-related problem-solving components embodied in the Singapore School Mathematics Curriculum Framework (SSMCF): concepts, skills, processes, metacognition and attitudes. Data from post-lesson student interviews which were stimulated by videos of the lesson revealed that the development of proficiencies in mathematics skills was most commonly emphasised in the “highs” of mathematics lessons while emphasis on metacognitive strategies was the least emphasised. This was true for all four courses of study (i.e. Integrated Programme, Express, Normal (Academic) and Normal (Technical)). The chapter further categorises the student data into teacher approaches and class activities that have been perceived by the students as the highs of mathematics lessons. While the perceived value for teacher approaches differ across all four courses of study, class practice and peer discussion were the most commonly cited class activities for all courses of study. Findings from the study provide important implications on the way to better engage students in the teaching and learning of mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad, F., & Aziz, J. (2009). Students’ perception of their teachers’ teaching of literature communicating and understanding through the eyes of the audience. European Journal of Social Sciences,7(3), 17–26.
Attard, C. (2011). “My favourite subject is maths. For some reason no-one really agrees with me”: Student perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning in the upper primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal,23, 363–377.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Instruction and curriculum. Regional education laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, topical papers and reprints, number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
Chang, M., Singh, K., & Filer, K. (2009). Language factors associated with achievement grouping in math classrooms: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,20(1), 27–45.
Clarke, D., Emanuelsson, J., Jablonka, E., & Mok, I. A. C. (2006). The learner’s perspective study and international comparisons of classroom practice. In D. Clarke, J. Emanuelsson, E. Jablonka, & I. A. C. Mok (Eds.), Making connections: Comparing mathematics classrooms around the world (pp. 1–22). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Clarke, D., Keitel, C., & Shimizu, Y. (2006). The learner’s perspective study. In D. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cleaves, W. P. (2008). Promoting mathematics accessibility through multiple representations jigsaws. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School,13(8), 446–452.
Donovan, S., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Goldin, G. A., & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 397–430). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Huang, M. (2009). Classroom homogeneity and the distribution of student math performance: A country-level fixed-effects analysis. Social Science Research,38(4), 781–791.
Kaur, B. (2008). Teaching and learning of mathematics: What really matters to teachers and students? ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(6), 951–962.
Kaur, B. (2009). Characteristics of good mathematics teaching in Singapore grade 8 classrooms: A juxtaposition of teachers’ practice and students’ perception. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(3), 333–347.
Kaya, S. (2015). The effect of the type of achievement grouping on students’ question generation in science. The Australian Educational Researcher,42(4), 429–441.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Lee, N. H., Ng, K. E. D., & Yeo, J. B. W. (2019). Metacognition in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In T. L. Toh, B. Kaur, & E. G. Tay (Eds.), Mathematics education in Singapore (pp. 241–268). Singapore: Springer.
Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 33–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Martinez-Sierra, G. (2014). Good mathematics teaching from Mexican high school students’ perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,12(6), 1547–1573.
Ministry of Education. (2012). O-Level mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Author.
Ministry of Education. (2017, March 7). MOE FY 2017 committee of supply debate speech by Minister of Education (Schools) Ng Chee Meng. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/news/speeches/moe-fy-2017-committee-of-supply-debate-speech-by-minister-of-education-schools-ng-chee-meng.
Ministry of Education. (2018a, October 11). 21st century competencies. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system/21st-century-competencies.
Ministry of Education. (2018b). 2020 Secondary mathematics syllabuses. Singapore: Author.
Murray, S. (2011). Secondary students’ descriptions of “good” mathematics teachers. Australian Mathematics Teacher,67(4), 14–21.
Pang, J. S. (2009). Good mathematics instruction in South Korea. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(3), 349–362.
Piaget, J. (1932). The language and thought of the child (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science,33(2), 105–119.
Saleh, M., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Structuring collaboration in mixed-ability groups to promote learning, verbal interaction and motivation of average-ability students. Contemporary Educational Psychology,32(3), 314–331.
Shimizu, Y. (2009). Characterizing exemplary mathematics instruction in Japanese classrooms from the learner’s perspective. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(3), 311–318.
Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wang, T. Y., & Hsieh, F. J. (2017). Taiwanese high school students’ perspectives on effective mathematics teaching behaviours. Studies in Educational Evaluation,55, 35–45.
Yeo, J. B. W. (2018). Engaging the hearts of mathematics learners. In P. C. Toh & B. L. Chua (Eds.), Mathematics instruction: Goals, tasks and activities (Association of Mathematics Educators 2018 Yearbook, pp. 115-132). Singapore: World Scientific.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, N.H., Kaur, B., Safii, L. (2021). The Enacted Curriculum—Students’ Perspectives of Good Mathematics Lessons in Singapore Secondary Schools. In: Kaur, B., Leong, Y.H. (eds) Mathematics Instructional Practices in Singapore Secondary Schools. Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8956-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8956-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-8955-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-8956-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)