Skip to main content

Usability Evaluation of Virtual Reality-Based Fire Training Simulator Using a Combined AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

With the continuous advances in virtual reality (VR) technology and the widespread use of VR-based fire training simulators that provide users with an effective training system, developing effective and usable interactive VR-based fire training simulators is a novel challenge for systems designers and ergonomics. Traditional usability standards do not consider features specific to virtual environments (VEs). Therefore, it is crucial to improve and use relevant research techniques that can estimate the usability of VE simulators. An efficient usability assessment should be capable to receive feedback from users on how efficiently they use a VR simulator and how they prefer to use it. This article intends to introduce a new framework for conducting a usability assessment for a VR fire training simulator using a combined analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach (FCE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. El Mostafa Bourhim, Research Team, and Research Team Abdelghani Cherkaoui (2020) Efficacy of virtual reality for studying people’s pre-evacuation behavior under fire. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 102484

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen J (1993) Usability engineering. Academic Press, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowman DA, Hodges LF (1997) An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on interactive 3D graphics, pp 35–38. ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Poupyrev I, Ichikawa T (1999) Manipulating objects in virtual worlds: categorization and empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. J. Vis Lang Comput 10(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanney KM, Mollaghasemi M, Reeves L, Breaux R, Graeber DA (2003) Usability engineering of virtual environment (VEs): identifying multiple criteria that drive effective VE system design. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 58:447–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hix D, Gabbard JL (2002) Usability engineering of virtual environments. In: Stanney KM (ed) Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 681–699

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kalawsky RS (1999) VRUSE—a computerized diagnostic tool: for usability evaluation of virtual/synthetic environments systems. Appl Ergon 30:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowman D (1999) Interaction techniques for common tasks in immersive virtual environments: Design, evaluation, and application. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia University of Technology, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCauley-Bell P (2002) Ergonomics in virtual environments. handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 807–826

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sadowski W, Stanney KM (2002) Measuring and managing presence in virtual environments. Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications, pp 791–806. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turk M, Robertson G (2000) Perceptual user interfaces. Commun ACM 43(3):33–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang E, Dillon,Mar TS (2006) A usability-evaluation metric based on a soft-computing approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. A, Syst Hum 36(2):356–372

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bourhim EM, Cherkaoui A (2020) Selection of optimal game engine by using ahp approach for virtual reality fire safety training. In: Abraham A, Cherukuri A, Melin P, Gandhi N (eds.) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 940. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bourhim EM, Cherkaoui A (2020) Exploring the potential of virtual reality in fire training research using A’WOT hybrid method. In: Thampi S et al. (eds.) Intelligent Systems, Technologies and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1148. Springer, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to El Mostafa Bourhim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bourhim, E.M., Cherkaoui, A. (2021). Usability Evaluation of Virtual Reality-Based Fire Training Simulator Using a Combined AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Approach. In: Jeena Jacob, I., Kolandapalayam Shanmugam, S., Piramuthu, S., Falkowski-Gilski, P. (eds) Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8530-2_73

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics