Skip to main content

Fintech, Overcoming Friction and New Models of Financial Regulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulating FinTech in Asia

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation ((PLBI))

Abstract

The development of new technologies by financial service providers is not new; banks, for instance, have always utilized technology to improve front- and back-office operations. The historical significance of fintech does not derive from the use of technology per se, but the leveraging of the distinct properties of digital technologies by non-traditional actors to offer consumers a better experience of financial services. More specifically, the goal of overcoming ‘friction’ in the user experience is here identified as the core feature driving many recent developments in a fintech context. This chapter explores the implications of such an account for incumbent financial institutions and regulators. From the perspective of incumbents, this new emphasis on the consumer experience requires banks and other financial institutions to organize-for-innovation. New capacities and a shift in mindset are needed to deliver a different kind of user experience, and two effective strategies for incumbents are explored. First, adopting more decentralized forms of organization and governance—what we refer to as ‘decentralized ecosystems’—that are better placed to innovate and overcome friction. Second, adopting a more strategic approach to venturing, i.e., purchasing start-ups from the fintech sector and integrating their innovations into incumbent operations. From a regulatory perspective, this requires a greater willingness on the part of regulators and other policymakers to foster experimentation in financial services. As such, the goal of regulation needs to shift from a traditional focus on managing systemic risk to more dynamic models that seek to facilitate responsible innovation and the delivery of a better-quality user experience. This can be achieved, for example, by state regulators working together—partnering—with incumbents and start-ups in the financial service ecosystems of the future via regulatory sandboxes and other similar schemes. Regulatory developments in Asia and Europe provide some evidence that policymakers recognize the need for such a shift in emphasis. However, doubts remain about whether they have gone far enough in pursuing this goal and that the full benefits of the fintech revolution have been realized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Erroll and Erroll (2005).

  2. 2.

    See Manning (2000).

  3. 3.

    See Batiz-Lazo (2015).

  4. 4.

    For an overview of these challenges, see Price Waterhouse Coopers (2014).

  5. 5.

    On the ‘attention economy,’ more generally, see Wu (2016).

  6. 6.

    For a general overview see, Chishti and Barberis (2016), King (2018), McMillan (2014), Sironi (2016).

  7. 7.

    Evans (2018).

  8. 8.

    For an overview of such apps, see Pratskevich (2019).

  9. 9.

    See, for example, Sironi (2016).

  10. 10.

    For example, on Alibaba’s move into financial services, see Zhou et al. (2015). Similar developments can be seen in Japan with the development of Line Pay.

  11. 11.

    See Parker et al. (2016); Moazed and Johnson (2016).

  12. 12.

    Available at: https://www.imore.com/steve-jobs-you-have-start-customer-experience-and-work-backwards-technology. Accessed 31 March 2020.

  13. 13.

    Available at: https://www.imore.com/steve-jobs-you-have-start-customer-experience-and-work-backwards-technology. Accessed 31 March 2020.

  14. 14.

    Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/fb7a1cfc-84f7-11e8-96dd-fa565ec55929. Accessed 20 February 20, 2020.

  15. 15.

    Available at: https://www.techinasia.com/category/fintech. Accessed 31 March 2020.

  16. 16.

    Bloomberg Professional Services (2019).

  17. 17.

    For an overview of these challenges, see Price Waterhouse Cooper (2014).

  18. 18.

    Fenwick and Vermeulen (2015), Fenwick and Vermeulen (2019); Fenwick et al. (2019).

  19. 19.

    The concept of an ‘ecosystem’ described here is based on the empirical study of the most successful technology firms today. As such, it represents an ‘ideal type’ or composite of how a business needs to organize its operations and governance in a digital age. References to specific companies in the following are not meant as blanket endorsements of those companies, but an acknowledgment that on the specific point cited that company has identified an interesting approach. In this respect, we hope to move beyond the ‘all or nothing’ attitude that currently characterizes discussion of the most successful tech-firms.

  20. 20.

    Newton (2015).

  21. 21.

    For example, they seem to understand intuitively the power of co-working spaces; many smaller banks, for instance, have already turned their branches into co-working spaces in this way. See Macheel (2019).

  22. 22.

    CBInsights (2018).

  23. 23.

    Available at: https://www.techinasia.com/category/fintech. Accessed 31 March 2020.

  24. 24.

    Tweddle (2018).

  25. 25.

    See Beaumont (2018); Shevlin (2019).

  26. 26.

    Beaumont (2018), Shevlin (2019).

  27. 27.

    Zetzsche (2017).

  28. 28.

    Available at: https://www.openbanking.org.uk/. Accessed 31 March 2020.

  29. 29.

    See Camerinelli (2017).

  30. 30.

    See generally Price Waterhouse Cooper (2016). For an account of the potential new risks, see Hacquedord et al. (2019).

  31. 31.

    Creehan and Tierno (2019).

  32. 32.

    See Gupta (2019).

  33. 33.

    Kaal and Vermeulen (2017); Malan (2018).

  34. 34.

    See Kessler (2018).

  35. 35.

    Fenwick and Vermeulen (2019).

  36. 36.

    Reddy (2018).

  37. 37.

    Levin (2019).

  38. 38.

    Fenwick et al. (2017).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Fenwick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fenwick, M., Vermeulen, E.P.M. (2020). Fintech, Overcoming Friction and New Models of Financial Regulation. In: Fenwick, M., Van Uytsel, S., Ying, B. (eds) Regulating FinTech in Asia. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5819-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5819-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5818-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5819-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics