Skip to main content

Not a Monolithic Movement: The Diverse and Shifting Messaging of Australia’s Far-Right

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Far-Right in Contemporary Australia

Abstract

This chapter presents selected findings from a large multi-method study on the narratives and networks of far-right movements in Victoria, Australia. Drawing on a systematic analysis of the textual content of 12 far-right groups’ Facebook pages, it presents a heuristic typology differentiating between three clusters of far-right groups: anti-Islam, cultural superiority and racial superiority groups. The chapter offers empirical evidence on how certain mobilisation themes, present to a varying degree across all far-right groups, shift over time. While there was a consistent decrease in the prevalence of anti-Islam messaging between 2015 and 2017, issues around crime and violence as well as gender and sexuality have gained prominence in anti-Islam and cultural superiority type groups. This is also attributed to the way in which many far-right groups strategically respond to new discursive opportunities, afforded to them by heightened public discourses, for example, on same-sex marriage or alleged ‘gang crimes’ in Victoria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In response to the rise of right-wing parties across Europe in recent years, the scholarly attention has shifted more towards the phenomenon of right-wing populism. Populism is commonly understood as ‘a political style [rather] than a manifestation of consistent political substance’ (Alvares and Dahlgren 2016: 49; also Nadeau and Helly 2016). While there are numerous definitions of populism, many of them combine at least two elements, a focus on ‘the people’ and anti-elitism (Sheets et al. 2016). Albertazzi and McDonnell’s definition also contains these two key features (2008: 3): ‘[Populism is] an ideology which pits a virtuous and homogenous people against a set of elites and dangerous “others” who are together depicted as depriving (or attempting to deprive) the sovereign people of their rights, values, prosperity, identity and voice’.

  2. 2.

    Voogt (2017: 34), from the perspective of an expert non-governmental organisations specialised in fighting online hatred, makes a similar distinction ‘between traditional White supremacist far-right groups and the increasingly active anti-Muslim groups’, without claiming this would capture all active far-right groups in Australia.

  3. 3.

    We are aware that Facebook is not the primary online platform for most extreme right-wing, White superiority groups, which tend to be more active on Twitter or in closed online forums or blogs. For methodological reasons we focussed on only one social media platform and chose Facebook, which was the most prominent platform for most of far-right groups in Australia.

  4. 4.

    ‘All words’ refers to all word stems as defined by NVivo 10 and excludes stop words (words like ‘and’ or ‘is’ that were not included in the word frequency analysis).

  5. 5.

    Apex was the name of an informal group of young people of various ethnocultural backgrounds who were involved in a number of crimes (e.g. robbery, carjacking, assault) that attracted a lot of media attention especially in 2016 and, to some extent, in 2017 and 2018, and were typically portrayed—in a racialising manner—as ‘African gangs’.

  6. 6.

    We are aware that many of the far-right groups under analysis talk about homosexuality or marriage also within their anti-Islam messaging. Despite the resulting inaccuracies, we consider a word frequency analysis to be suitable to explore trends and developments in the references to such themes.

  7. 7.

    Other word frequencies also increased, without any obvious immediate relation to the terrorist attack; the word Burka, for example, was used much more frequently in the week after the attack than the week before (proportional frequency increased by 121 per cent).

  8. 8.

    We excluded the posts and comments of the far-right anti-Islam group PDLA from this analysis because the group became largely dysfunctional in 2017; not including the PDLA avoids that the data comparison is skewed.

References

  • Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (eds.) (2008). Twenty-First Century Populism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvares, C., & Dahlgren, P. (2016). Populism, Extremism and Media: Mapping an Uncertain Terrain. European Journal of Communication, 31(1), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M. (1981). The New Racism. Conservatives and the Ideology of the Tribe. London: Junction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinalli, M., & Giugni, M. (2013). Political Opportunities, Citizenship Models and Political Claim-Making Over Islam. Ethnicities, 13(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, M. (2016, March 14). Melbourne Street Brawl Blamed on Apex Gang after Moomba Festival. The Guardian. Retrieved December 4, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/mar/14/melbourne-street-brawl-blamed-on-apex-gang-after-moomba-festival

  • Dean, G., Bell, P., & Vakhitova, Z. (2016). Right-Wing Extremism in Australia: The Rise of the New Radical Right. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 11(2), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D. (1995). Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fozdar, F., & Low, M. (2015). ‘They Have to Abide by Our Laws…and Stuff’: Ethnonationalism Masquerading as Civic Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 21(3), 524–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., Peucker, M., Smith, D., & Dellal, H. (2016). Stocktake Research Project: A Systematic Literature and Selected Program Review on Social Cohesion, Community Resilience and Violent Extremism 2011–2015. Melbourne: Victorian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, G. (2017). Making Sense of the Alt-Right. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, D. (2013). Far-right and Islamist Extremist Discourses: Shifting Patterns of Enmity. In M. Taylor, D. Holbrook, & P. M. Currie (Eds.), Extreme Right Wing Political Violence and Terrorism (pp. 215–237). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignazi, P. (1992). The Silent Counter-Revolution. Hypotheses on the Emergence of Extreme Right-Wing Parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22(1), 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamin, J. (2013). Two Different Realities: Notes of Populism and the Extreme Right. In A. Mammone, E. Godin, & B. Jenkins (Eds.), Varieties of Right-wing Extremism in Europe (pp. 38–52). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive Opportunities and the Evolution of Rights-Wing Violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (2004). Political Context and Opportunity. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 67–90). Malden: Blackwell Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Koopman, R., Duyvendak, J., & Giugni, M. (1995). New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and Political Opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, M. (2017). The Rise of the Radical Right in Eastern Europe: Between Mainstreaming and Radicalization. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 18(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2000). The Ideology of the Extreme Right. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, F., & Helly, D. (2016). Extreme Right in Quebec? The Facebook Pages in Favor of the “Quebec Charter of Values”. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 48(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., & Scrivens, R. (2016). Uneasy Alliances: A Look at the Right-Wing Extremist Movement in Canada. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(9), 819–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, M., & Kandylis, G. (2016). Violence and Extreme-Right Activism: The Neo-Nazi Golden Dawn in a Greek Rural Community. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(6), 589–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peucker, M., Smith, D., & Iqbal, M. (2017). Stocktake Research Project Update. A Systematic Literature and Social Media Platform Review of Extreme Right Groups Active in Victoria 2016–2017. Melbourne: Victoria University (Unpublished document).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peucker, M., Smith, D., & Iqbal, M. (2018). Mapping Narratives and Networks of Far-Right Movements in Victoria. Research Report. Melbourne: Victoria University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets, P., Bos, L., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2016). Media Cues and Citizen Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28(3), 307–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, S. (2017). Countering Far-Right Recruitment Online: CAPE’s Practitioner Experience. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 12(1), 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Peucker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peucker, M., Smith, D., Iqbal, M. (2019). Not a Monolithic Movement: The Diverse and Shifting Messaging of Australia’s Far-Right. In: Peucker, M., Smith, D. (eds) The Far-Right in Contemporary Australia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8351-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics