Skip to main content

Sentence Similarity Using Syntactic and Semantic Features for Multi-document Summarization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 56))

Abstract

Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) is a process obtaining precise and concise information from a specific set of documents which are on the same topic. The generated summary makes the user to understand the content in a set of documents. The existing approaches suffer with the lack of establishment of semantic and syntactic relationship among the words within a sentence. In this paper, a novel unsupervised MDS framework is proposed by ranking sentences using semantic and syntactic information embedded in the sentences. Empirical evaluations are carried using lexical, syntactic, and semantic features on DUC2002 dataset. The experimental results on DUC2002 prove that the proposed model is comparable with existing systems using various performance measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wan X (2010) Minimum distortion with multi document summarization. In: International conference on data mining, pp 354–363

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dong L et al (2015) MDS with recursive neural networks. AAAI, pp 2153–2159

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agirre E. Spanish semantic textual similarity using interpretability. In: 9th international workshop on semantic evaluation, pp 252–263

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanig C. Semantic textual similarity from word alignments. In: 9th international workshop on semantic evaluation, pp 264–268

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arafat Sultan Md. Contextual evidence and word similarity, its exploiting. ACM Trans 2:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel (2012) Multiple similarity measures for semantic textual similarity. In: First joint conference on lexical and computational semantics

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kononenko I. Multi document summarization with weighted multielement graph. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):535–543

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hakkani-Tur. Topically coherent sentences using summarization. In: 49th annual meeting of the HLT-ACM, vol 1, pp 491–499

    Google Scholar 

  9. Griffiths, Nonparametric inference for the nested Chinese restaurant process. J ACM 57(7):30

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nenkova K (2014) Estimation of word importance for MDS for news. EACL, pp 712–721

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang J (2008) Multi-document summarization using cluster-based link analysis. In: 31st annual international SIGIR, information retrieval, pp 299–306

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu S (2008) Symmetric matrix factorization and semantic analysis MDS. In: 31st annual international Conference on information retrieval, pp 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu S et al (2009) Multi-document summarization using topic modelling. In: Proceeding of the IJCNLP, pp 297–300

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martins A (2007) Automatic text summarization, a survey. Literature survey for Language, CMU

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klavans J et al (2005) Multilingual MDS for sentence similarity. Report, Columbia University, Apr 2005

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milic-Frayling N et al (2004) Semantic graphs for document summarization. In: Workshop on link analysis

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grobelnik M et al (2000) Learning semantic graph mapping for text summarization. In: 49th annual meeting of the ACM, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kan M (2011) Evaluating text coherence using discourse relations. In: 49th annual meeting of the ACM

    Google Scholar 

  19. Navigli R et al (2003) Axiomatization in WordNet, extension and conceptual relations. In: Databases and applications of semantics, Italy, pp 820–838

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kintsch W. Measurement of textual coherence using lsa. Disc Proc 25(2–3):285–307

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boyce B. Information retrieval systems. Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  22. Livesay K. Explorations in context space using words, sentences. Disc Proc 25:211–257

    Google Scholar 

  23. Turney P. Mining the web for synonyms—PMI versus LSA. In: 12th European conference on machine learning

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chodorow M. Lexical database using WordNet. MIT Press, word sense identification, 265–283

    Google Scholar 

  25. Corley C. Knowledge-based measures for text semantic similarity. American Association for AI

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li Y, Mclean D. Corpus statistics for sentence similarity. IEEE Trans. Knowl Data Eng 13:1138–1149

    Google Scholar 

  27. Inkpen. String similarity for STS. ACM Trans Knowl Data 2(10)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Balasubramanie (2010) MDS using feature specific sentence extraction. IJCSIT 2(4):99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Anjaneyulu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anjaneyulu, M., Sarma, S.S.V.N., Vijaya Pal Reddy, P., Prem Chander, K., Nagaprasad, S. (2019). Sentence Similarity Using Syntactic and Semantic Features for Multi-document Summarization. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Hassanien, A., Gupta, D., Khanna, A., Pan, I. (eds) International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 56. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2354-6_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics