Skip to main content

Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signal Analysis for Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Nanoelectronics, Circuits and Communication Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 511))

Abstract

Depression or Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a psychiatric disorder. It is the major contributor to overall global burden of disease. Any deterioration in brain functioning is reflected in Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. EEG signals are highly complex, nonstationary and nonlinear. So, it is very difficult to analyze visually and identify changes in the waveform in order to classify MDD and normal subjects. Thus, computerized quantitative EEG is used for the analysis of signals. Support Vector Machine (SVM) using band power feature reported an accuracy of 98.33% and using Kernel Eigen-Filter-Bank Common Spatial Patterns (KEFB-CSP) gave an accuracy of 91.67% [1, 2]. Logistic Regression (LR) using band power feature reported an accuracy of 98.33%, using 4 nonlinear features combination provided an accuracy of 90%, using wavelet transform provided an accuracy of 87.5% and using only alpha power gave an accuracy of 73.3% [1, 3, 4]. Naïve Bayesian (NB) using band power feature provided an accuracy of 96.8% [1]. Artificial Neural Network using Relative Wavelet Energy (RWE) reported an accuracy of 98.11%, using power spectrum feature gave accuracy of 84% and using Lep–Ziv complexity accuracy of 60–80% was reported [5, 6, 7]. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) reported an accuracy of 91.2% using SASI (Spectral Asymmetry Index) and DFA (Detrended Fluctuation Analysis) [8]. Decision Tree provided an accuracy of 80% using EEG band power as feature [9]. The study reveals that, in general, high classification accuracy is achieved by SVM, LR and ANN and highest classification accuracy of 98.33% is achieved by SVM. Highest accuracy is achieved by SVM because it is more robust and computationally more efficient due to maximal margin gap between separating hyper planes and kernel trick. The study gives some ideas which could be helpful for guiding and improving future researches. Since linear and nonlinear method for feature extraction are both equally efficient. So any of the linear/nonlinear feature can be used. For feature selection and reduction, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) can be used. Since SVM, LR and ANN give high classification accuracy and any of them can be used or any hybrid technique like GA-SVM, GA-ANN can be used. This chapter compares various EEG signal analysis techniques, compares their accuracy and methodology used and finally recommends the most suitable technique based on the accuracy for detection of depression. The chapter also summarizes some of the key finding related to EEG features based on present state of art. These results could be helpful for guiding and improving the future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li Y, Fan F (2005) Classification of schizophrenia and depression by EEG with ANNs. In: 27th annual international conference of engineering in medicine and biology society, IEEE-EMB, 2005, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stewart JL, Coan JA, Towers DN, Allen JJB (2014) Resting and task-elicited prefrontal EEG alpha asymmetry in depression: support for the capability model. Psychophysiology, 446–455

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hosseinifarda B, Moradia MH, Rostami R (2013) Classifying depression patients and normal subjects using machine learning techniques and nonlinear features from EEG signal. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 109:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantri S, Agrawal P, Patil D, Wadhai V (2015) Non invasive EEG signal processing framework for real time depression analysis. In: SAI intelligent systems conference, pp 518–521

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fan F, Li Y, Qiu Y, Zhu Y (2005) Use of ANN and complexity measures in cognitive EEG discrimination. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society, 27th annual international conference, IEEE-EMBS, 2005, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liao S, Wu C, Huang H, Cheng W, Liu Y (2017) Major depression detection from EEG signals using kernel eigen-filter-bank common spatial patterns. Sensors, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinrikus H, Suhhova A, Bachmann M, Aadamsoo K, Vohma U, Lass J, Tuulik V (2009) Electroencephalographic spectral asymmetry index for detection of depression. Med Biomed Eng Comput, pp 1291–1299

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mumtaz W, Xia L, Ali SSA, Yasin MMAM, Hussain M, Malik AS (2017) Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based computer-aided technique to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Biomed Signal Process Control 31:108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization (2017) Depression and other common mental disorders global health estimates. WHO Document Production Services, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (2011) Global burden of mental disorders and the need for a comprehensive, coordinated response from health and social sectors at the country level. Report by the Secretariat. EB 130/9

    Google Scholar 

  11. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association Washington, DC, pp 339–345

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bachmann M, Lass J, Suhhova A, Hinrikus H (2013) Spectral asymmetry and Higuchi’s Fractal dimension measures of depression electroencephalogram. Comput Math Methods Med 2013:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grin-Yatsenko VA, Baas I, Ponomarev VA, Kropotov JD (2010) Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG recordings at early stages of depressive disorders. Clin Neurophysiol 121:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammadi M et al (2015) Data mining EEG signals in depression for their diagnostic value. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak, pp 108–123

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruder GE, Stewart JW, Hellerstein D, Alvarenga JE, Alschuler D, McGratha PJ (2012) Abnormal functional brain asymmetry in depression: evidence of biologic commonality between major depression and dysthymia. Psychiatry Res, pp 250–254

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bjork MH, Sand T, Bråthen G, Linaker OM, Morken G, Nilsen BM, Vaaler AE (2008) Quantitative EEG findings in patients with acute, brief depression combined with other fluctuating psychiatric symptoms: a controlled study from an acute psychiatric department. BMC Psychiatry, 2008, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ricardo-Garcell J (2009) EEG sources in a group of patients with major depressive disorders. Int J Psychophysiol 71:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bachmann M, Lass J, Hinrikus H (2017) Single channel EEG analysis for detection of depression. Biomed Signal Process Control 31:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Subasi A (2007) EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model. Expert Syst Appl 32:1084–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mumtaz W, Xia L, Yasin MAM, Ali SSA, Malik AS (2016) A wavelet-based technique to predict treatment outcome for major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li Y, Li Y, Tong S, Tang Y, Zhu Y (2007) More normal EEGs of depression patients during mental arithmetic than rest. In: Joint meeting of the 6th international symposium on noninvasive functional source imaging of the brain and heart and the international conference on functional biomedical imaging, 2007, pp 165–168

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puthankattil SD, Joseph PK (2012) Classification of EEG signals in normal and depression conditions by ANN using RWE and signal entropy. J Mech Med Biol 12:1240019–1240032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sood M, Bhooshan SV (2014) Automatic processing of EEG signals for Seizure detection using soft computing techniques. In: IEEE international conference on recent advances and innovations in engineering, 2014, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chandaka S, Chatterjee A, Munshi S (2009) Cross-correlation aided support vector machine classifier for classification of EEG signals. Expert Syst Appl 36:1329–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Subasi A, Gursoy MI (2010) EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 37:8569–8666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabetia M, Boostani R, Katebi SD, Price GW (2007) Selection of relevant features for EEG signal classification of schizophrenic patients. Biomed Signal Process Control 2:122–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kalaivani M, Kalaivani V, Devi AV (2014) Analysis of EEG signal for the detection of brain abnormalities. In: IJCA proceedings on international conference on simulations in computing nexus pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar RSS, Jose JP (2011) Seizure detection in EEG using time frequency analysis and SVM. In: International conference on emerging trends in electrical and computer technology (ICETECT), IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kousarrizi MRN (2009) Feature extraction and classification of EEG signals using wavelet transform, SVM and artificial neural networks for brain computer interfaces. In: International joint conference on bioinformatics, systems biology and intelligent computing, IEEE, 2009, pp 352–355

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tzallas AT, Tsipouras MG, Fotiadis DI (2007) The use of time-frequency distributions for epileptic seizure detection in EEG recordings. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2007, pp 3–6

    Google Scholar 

  31. Abásolo D, Hornero R, Escudero J, Gomez C, Garcia M, Lopez M (2006) Approximate entropy and auto mutual information analysis of the electroencephalogram in Alzheimer’s disease patients. In: IET 3rd international conference on advances in medical, signal and information processing, IEEE, 2006, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tsoi C, So DSC, Sergejew A (1993) Classification of electroencephalogram using artificial neural networks. In: 7th NIPS conference conference: advances in neural information processing systems 6, 1993, pp 1151–1158

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalini Mahato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mahato, S., Paul, S. (2019). Electroencephalogram (EEG) Signal Analysis for Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): A Review. In: Nath, V., Mandal, J. (eds) Nanoelectronics, Circuits and Communication Systems . Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 511. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0776-8_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0776-8_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0775-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0776-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics